Abstract
The maximum entropy method offers several advantages over traditional direct methods in the a-priori solution of crystal structures. These include the full use of all invariants at every point without their explicit generation; the use of a non-uniform distribution of atoms, qME(x), which is constantly updated guaranteeing that the aproximate joint probability distribution of structure factors remains valid even for large deviations from uniformity; the natural incorporation of the variances of the structure factors, a tolerance towards errors in the intensity data, and a stability that is independent of data resolution. In ab-initio studies on small organic molecules, starting with origin defining reflections only, the maximum entropy method is used to generate qME(x) which can then be used as a source of new phase information via extrapolation, and this new information is used to update qME(x) in a cyclic fashion. When the extrapolation process has exhausted the currently assumed phase information, strong unphased structure factors are given permuted phases; this recenters the asymptotic expansion for the joint probability distribution of the phased structure factors, and a likelihood criterion is used to select the most probable phases for these reflections and to carry out phase refinement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
G. Bricogne (1984) Acta Cryst., A40, 410–445.
G. Bricogne (1988a) in Crystallographic Computing 4 ed. N.W. Isaacs and M.R. Taylor, O.U.P pp 60–79.
G. Bricogne (1988b) Acta Cryst., A44, 517–545.
W. Cochran (1955) Acta Cryst., 8, 473–478.
D.M. Collins (1978) Nature (London), 298, 49–51.
D.M. Collins and M.C. Mahar (1983) Acta Cryst., A39, 252–256.
H.E. Daniels (1954) Ann. Math. Stat., 25, 631–650.
G.T. DeTitta, J.W. Edmonds, D.A. Langs and H.A. Hauptman (1975) Acta Cryst. A31, 474–479.
G. Germain and M.M. Woolfson, (1968) Acta Cryst, B24, 91–96.
C.J. Gilmore (1984) J. Appl. Cryst., 17, 42–46.
C.J. Gilmore (1984) J. Appl. Cryst., 21, In the press.
S.R. Hall and V. Subramanian (1982) Acta Cryst., A38, 598–608.
H.A. Hauptman in Theory and Practice of Direct Methods in Crystallography ed. M.C.F. Ladd and R.A. Palmer, Plenum Press, 1980, pp 151–197.
J. Karle and I.L. Karle (1966) Acta Cryst. 21, 849–859.
C.E. Shannon and W. Weaver (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Il.
A.J.C. Wilson (1949) Acta Cryst., 2, 318–321.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bannister, C., Bricogne, G., Gilmore, C. (1989). A Multisolution Phase Determination Method in X-Ray Crystallography. In: Skilling, J. (eds) Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7860-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7860-8_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4044-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7860-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive