Abstract
Throughout the twentieth century there has been a general movement towards larger minimal optimum plant size. Sands (1961) found that average physical output per plant increased between 1904 and 1947 by about 3 percent per annum. Blair (1972) found the share of industry sales originating in the eight largest plants declined from 1947 to 1958 thereby concluding that this seeming reversal of past trends was attributable to fundamental changes in the direction of technological advances away from centralizing innovations and towards decentralizing technologies.1 Shepherd (1982) found a substantial increase in the scope of competition within the four-digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) industries between 1958 and 1980 confirming the trend identified by Blair. Also, Carlsson (1989a) showed that both firm and plant size decreased between 1972 and 1982 in manufacturing as a whole and especially in metalworking industries in several industrial countries. He hypothesized that the emergence of new computer-based technology has improved the quality and productivity of small and medium scale production relative to standardized mass-production techniques which dominated previously. According to Piore and Sable (1984) the emergence of this new technology represents, in fact, an “industrial divide” where firms and society are confronted with a choice of technological modes.2
We wish to thank Jianping Yang for his computational assistance. All errors and omissions remain our responsibility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abernathy, William J., Clark, Kim B. and Katrow, Alan M., 1983, Industrial Renaissance, New York: Basic Books.
Acs, Zoltan J., 1984, The changing Structure of the U.S. Economy, New York: Praeger.
Acs, Zoltan J. and Audretsch, David B., 1988(a) “Innovation in Large and Small Firms,” American Economic Review, 78, September, 678–690.
Acs, Zoltan J. and Audretsch, David B., 1988(b) “Testing the Schumpeterian Hypotheses,” Eastern Economic Journal, XIV, April June, 129–140.
Acs, Zoltan J. and Audretsch, David B., 1989, “Small-Firm Entry in U.S. Manufacturing,” Economica, 56, May, 255–266.
Acs, Zoltan J., Audretsch, David B., and Carlsson Bo, 1988, “Flexible Technology and Firm Size,” RPIE Working Paper, xx, Case Western Reserve University.
Acs, Zoltan J. and Audretsch, David B., 1990, Innovaton and Small Firms, Cambridge, MA. The MIT Press.
Audretsch, David B., Sleuwaegen Leo, and Yamawaki, Hideki, eds., 1989, The Convergence of Domestic and International Markets, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Bain, Joe, 1956, Barriers to New Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Barnett, Donald D. and Schorsch, Louis, 1983, Steel: Upheaval in a Basic Industry, Boston, Ballinger.
Berle, Adolf and Means, Gardiner, 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: Mcmillan.
Blair, John, 1972, Economic Concentration, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich.
Carlsson, Bo, 1984, “The Development and Use of Machine Tools in Historical Perspective,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5, 91–114.
Carlsson, Bo, 1989(a), “The Evolution of Manufacturing Technology and Its Impact on Industrial Structure: An International Study,” Small Business Economics, 1(1), 21–38.
Carlsson, Bo, 1989(b), “Flexibility and the Theory of the Firm,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7(2), 179–204.
Carlsson, Bo, 1990, “Small-Scale Industry at a Crossroads:U.S. Machine Tools in Global Perspective,” this volume, pp. 171–193.
Dodgson, Mark, 1985, Advanced Manufacturing Technology in the Small Firm, London: Technical Change Center.
Dosi, Giovanni, 1988, “Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation,” Journal of Economic Literature, 26, September, 1120–1171.
Dasgupta, Partha and Stiglitz, Joseph, 1980, “Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity,” The Economic Journal, 80, June, 266–293.
Galbraith, John K., 1957, The New Industrial State; Boston: Houghton Miffl in Co.
Geroski, P.A. and Pomroy, R., 1987, “Innovation and the Evolution of Market Structure,” Working Paper Series, 36, London Business School.
Globerman, Steven, 1975, “Technological Diffusion in the Canadian Tool and Die Industry,” Review of Economics and Statistics 57(2), May, 428–434.
Koning, Cees and Poutsma, Frederick, 1988, “Automatisierung und die Qualität der Arbeit in Klein-und Mittelbetrieben,” Internationales Gewerbearchive 36 (4), 238–250.
Lazerson, Mark H., 1990, “Transactional Calculus and Small Business Strategy,” this volume, pp. 25–41.
Mansfield, Edwin, et al., 1971, Research and Innovation in the Modern Corporation, New York: W.W. Norton.
Mills, David E., and Schumann, Laurence, 1985, “Industry Structure with Fluctuating Demand,” American Economic Review, 75, September 758–767.
Nabseth, Lars and Ray, G.F., eds., 1974, The Diffusion of New Industrial Processes: An International Study, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Northcott, J. and Rogers, P., 1984, Microelectronics in British Industry: The Pattern of Change, Policy Studies Institute, London.
Piore, Michael J., 1986, “The Decline of Mass Production and Union Survival in the USA,” Industrial Relations Journal, 17, Autumn, 207–213.
Piore, Michael J. and Sabel, Charles F., 1983, “Italian Small Business Development: Lessons for U.S. Industrial Policy,” in: John Zysman and Laura Tyson, (eds.), American Industry in International Competition, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Piore, Michael J. and Sabel, Charles F., 1984, The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York, NY: Basic Books.
Poutsma, Erik and Zwaard, Aad, 1989. “The Effects of Automation in Small Industrial Enterprises,” International Small Business Journal, 7(2), January/March, 35–43.
Pratten, Cliff, 1987, Final Report on “A Survey of the Economies of Scale,” Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, September.
Romeo, Anthony A., 1975, “Interindustry and Interfirm Differences in the Rate of Diffusion of an Innovation,” Review of Economics and Statistics 57(2), May, 311–319.
Sands, Saul S., 1961, “Changes in Scale of Production in United States Manufacturing Industry,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 43, November, 365–68.
Scherer, F.M., Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performancs, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1980.
Schwartzman, David, 1963, “Uncertainty and the Size of the Firm,” Economica, 30, August, 287–296.
Shepherd, William G., 1985, Public Policies Toward Business, 7th edition, Homewook, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Shepherd, William G., 1982, “Causes of Increased Competition in the Economy, 1939–1980,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 64, November, 613–626.
Silberston, Aubrey, 1972. “Economies of Scale in Theory and Practice,” Economic Journal, 82, March, 369–91.
Wheelwright, Steven C., 1985, “Restoring Competitiveness in U.S. Manufacturing,” California Management Review, 27 (32), 26–42.
White, Lawrence J., 1982, “The Determinants of the Relative Importance of Small Business,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 64, February, 42–49.
Winter, Sidney G., 1984, “Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5, 287–320.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., Carlsson, B. (1990). Flexibility, Plant Size and Industrial Restructuring. In: Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B. (eds) The Economics of Small Firms. Studies in Industrial Organization, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7854-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7854-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4057-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7854-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive