Skip to main content

Cycles, Convergence and Interregional Adjustment

  • Chapter
Migration and Labor Market Adjustment
  • 62 Accesses

Abstract

Economist’s concerns with distribution neither extend over all possible distributional descriptions nor rest on particular ones selected as if at random. Most particularly we classify returns to and economic activities of individuals by occupation and industry, by age, race and sex, and by level of education. Normally we do not collect information on the distribution of returns among individuals according to their height, weight, or the color of their hair, their food preferences, or whether they are Democrats or Republicans. That these kinds of classifications do not emerge, while the former do, is not an accident, nor is the final choice of classifications due to the vagaries of data collection. Rather, it is because we are concerned with observing the consequences of immobilizing factors. To change one’s race or sex is possible only under extreme circumstances. To change one’s occupation, employer, or residence frequently is quite costly. To amass the human or physical capital required to bring one’s earnings stream up to that of his neighbor might require more than a lifetime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonso, William: 1977, ‘The Population Factor and Urban Structure,’ Working Paper 02, Center for Population Studies, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alonso, William: 1964, ‘The Historic and the Structural Theories of Urban Form: Their Implications for Urban Renewal,’ Land Economics, May.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold, Victor (ed.): 1980, Alternatives to Confrontation, Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beale, Calvin: 1975, ‘The Revival of Population Growth in Non-metropolitan Urban American,’ ERS Paper 605, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  5. van den Berg Leo; Burns, Leland S. and Klaassen, Leo (eds.): 1987, Spatial Cycles, Aldershot, England and Brookfield, VT: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chinitz, Benjamin: 1986, ‘The Regional Transformation of the American Economy,’ Urban Studies, October.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Commission of the European Communities: 1987, Third Periodic Report from the Commission on the Social and Economic Situation and Development of the Regions of the Community, Brussels: EEC, May.

    Google Scholar 

  8. International Monetary Fund: 1986, International Financial Statistics, Washington: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kalachek, Edward A.: 1966, ‘The Composition of Unemployment and Public Policy,’ in R. A. and M.S. Gordon (eds.), Prosperity and Unemployment, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lessinger, Jack, Penturbia, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leven, Charles L.: 1970, ‘A Framework for the Evaluation of Secondary Impacts of Public Investments,’ Proceedings of the American Journal of Agricultural Economics, December.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leven, Charles L.: 1968, ‘Determinants of the Size and Spatial Form of Urban Areas,’ Regional Science Association Papers, Vol. XXII.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leven, Charles, L.: 1986, ‘A Note on the Economics of Remoteness,’ in Bylund, E. and Wilberg, U. (eds.), Regional Dynamics of Socio-Economic Change, Umea, Sweden: University of Umea (CERUM).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leven, Charles L.: 1987, ‘Regenerating the Economy of St. Louis,’ in Can Birmingham Grow Again?, Birmingham, England: Birmingham Settlement Future Studies Centre Conference Series No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leven, Charles, L.: 1988, ‘Post-Industrialism, Regional Change and the New Urban Geography,’ in Sternlieb, George (ed.), America’s New Market Geography, Rutgers, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, Ben-chieh: 1974, ‘Variations in the Quality of Life in the United States by State,’ Review of Social Economy, October.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, Ben-chieh: 1976, Quality of Life Indicators in U.S. Metropolitan Areas, New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Perloff, Harvey, S.: 1973, ‘New Towns-in Town in a National New Communities Program,’ in Perloff, H. S. and Sandberg, N. C. (eds.), New Towns: Why and for Whom?, New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson, Wilbur: 1965, A Preface to Urban Economics, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leven, C.L. (1989). Cycles, Convergence and Interregional Adjustment. In: Van Dijk, J., Folmer, H., Herzog, H.W., Schlottmann, A.M. (eds) Migration and Labor Market Adjustment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7846-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7846-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-7848-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7846-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics