Skip to main content

State Space Heterogeneity and Space Determination for Markov Models of Mobility

  • Chapter
Migration and Labor Market Adjustment
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

Since the seminal work of Lancaster and Nickell (1979–1980), the consequences of individual heterogeneity on aggregate stochastic processes of mobility are well known. It is possible to briefly characterize these as results of the following phenomenon (Salant, 1977). If we assume that exit rates out of a given state differ between individuals, then the longer the sojourn time the greater the proportion of the population having low exit rates and thus the smaller the mean exit rate. For a comprehensive overview, see Heckman and Singer (1986). There is, however, another source of heterogeneity for stochastic processes of mobility which lies in the definition of the state space of the process. The definition of the state space of a stochastic process has never been considered up to now. Generally, the definition of the state space is a straightforward result of the problem considered; or it is largely constrained by the information given by the data. For example, labour force mobility analysis uses two states (employment, unemployment); geographic mobility uses predefined administrative areas like states, regions, countries, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bartholomew, D.: 1982, Stochastic Models for Social Processes, 3rd edition New-York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F. and C. Morrisson: 1984, ‘La mobilité des salaires sur le cycle de vie: un échantillon de cadres français sur trente ans,’ Revue Economique, 35(5), 929–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F. and C. Morrisson: 1987, ‘Profils de carrières d’un écantillon d’ouvriers et d’employés,’ Economie et Statistique, 198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celeux, G. and J. Dieboldt: 1984, Reconnaissance de mélanges de densité et classification. Un algorithme d’apprentissage probabiliste: l’algorithme SEM. INRIA, Rapport de recherche no. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celeux, G. and J. Dieboldt: 1985, ‘The SEM Algorithm: A Probabilistic Teacher Algorithm Derived from the EM Algorithm for the Mixture Problem,’ Computational Statistics quarterly, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Celeux, G. and J. Dieboldt: 1986, Etude du comportement asymptotique d’un algorithme d’apprentissage probabiliste pour les mélanges de lois de probabilité. INRIA. rapport de recherche no. 563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, W.: 1966, An introduction to probability theory and its applications, II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. and B. Singer: 1984, ‘A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data,’ Econometrica, 52, 271–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. and B. Singer: 1986, ‘Social Science Duration Analysis,’ in J. J. Heckman and B. Singer (eds), Longitudinal analysis of labor market data: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch, J. D. and R. L. Prentice: 1980, The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, New-York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, N.: 1978, ‘Non Parametric Likelihood Estimation of a Mixing Distribution,’ Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 805–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster T.: 1979, ‘Econometric Methods for the Duration of Unemployment,’ Econometrica, 47(4), 939–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, T. and S. Nickell: 1980, ‘The Analysis of Reemployment Probabilities for the Unemployed,’ Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series A, 143(2), 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S.: 1979, ‘Estimating the Probability of Leaving Unemployment,’ Econometrica, 47(5), 1249–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salant, S.: 1977, ‘Search Theory and Duration Data: A Theory of Sorts,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, B.: 1977, ‘Relative Earnings Mobility in the United States,’ American Economic Review, 67, 926–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A. R.: 1971, ‘Year to Year Variation in the Earnings of Individuals,’ Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series A, 134, 374–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jayet, H. (1989). State Space Heterogeneity and Space Determination for Markov Models of Mobility. In: Van Dijk, J., Folmer, H., Herzog, H.W., Schlottmann, A.M. (eds) Migration and Labor Market Adjustment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7846-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7846-2_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-7848-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7846-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics