Skip to main content

Theories of Coalition Formation

  • Chapter
Decision Theory and Decision Behaviour

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLB,volume 15))

  • 217 Accesses

Abstract

As we have seen, the main thrust of the theory of cooperative games has been based on the concept of a solution, typically represented by a set of imputations, that is, distributions of some collectively achieved gain among the players. The sum of the payoffs defining an imputation represents the most that the players acting as a grand coalition can attain. It follows that the principal concern of this branch of game theory is with conflict resolution. The solution of the game represents, after all, a resolution of the conflicts of interests among the players. In the context of a normative theory, the solution of a game (in the form of a set of imputations) is rationalized as satisfying certain a priori stated principles of fairness or stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Among these solution concepts are the bargaining set and the kernel (cf. Rapoport, 1970, Chapters 6, 7). In each, payoff vectors are singled out that are in a certain sense stable with respect to given partitions of the set of players into coalitions. However, the question which of these coalition structures will actually form is not raised.

    Google Scholar 

  2. To account for this effect, one might redefine a minimal coalition as one containing a minimal number of parties instead of a minimal number of seats.

    Google Scholar 

  3. In this acronym, CL stands for closed’, i.e, gaplesscoalition (cf. p. 375); M stands for minimal R refers to a binary relation defining a political spectrum, e.g., party a is to the right of party b

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rapoport, A. (1989). Theories of Coalition Formation. In: Decision Theory and Decision Behaviour. Theory and Decision Library, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7840-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7840-0_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4047-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7840-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics