Abstract
During the last twenty-five years, much disagreement has arisen over the primacy of social factors and epistemological/cognitive factors in determining scientists’ descriptions of the physical world. The present study seeks to contribute to the understanding of the cognitive processes involved in conducting research in the exact sciences, and of the relations occurring between such processes and social practices. This analysis will suggest that within networks of actions comprising research work, there exist nodes where cerebral and social events merge and function symbiotically. Here, the issue of social hegemony versus epistemological determinism pales. The essential force acting on social/epistemological nodes is their historical and contemporary efficiency in providing physical description that withstand measured skepticism toward the immediate research that generates them, and that prove consistent with most general extant descriptions of physical objects and their interactions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
P. Gallison, Bubble Chambers and the Experimental Workplace”, in Achinstein P. and O. Hannaway (eds.), Observation, Experiment, and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science: ehp1, Cambridge, MA: the MIT Press, 1985.
T. Shinn, “Géométrie et language: la structure des modéles en sciences sociales et en sciences physiques”, Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 16 (October, 1987), 5-38. J. M. Ziman, Reliable Knowledge: an Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
R. Whitley, The Social and Intellectual Organization of the Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
J. R. Anderson, J. G. Greeno, P. J, Kline, and D. M. Neves, “Acquisition of Problem Solving Skill”, in J. R. Anderson (ed.), Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1981. M. L. Gick, and K. J. Holyoak, “Analogical Problem Solving”, Cognitive Psychology, Vol.12, 3 (1980), 306-355. S. K. Reed, G. W. Ernst, and R. Banerji, “The Role of Analogy in Transfer Between Similar Problem States” Cognitive Psychology 6 (1974), 436-450.
M. Black, Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1962.
M. Hesse, Models and Analogies in Science, London/New York: Sheed and Ward, 1963. W. A. Leatherdale, The Role of Analogy, Model and Metaphor in Science, Amsterdam/Oxford: University of New South Wales, 1974.
M. Denis, Les Images Mentales, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1979.
S. M. Kosslyn, Image and Mind, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
D. Marr, Vision: a Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, New York: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1982. D. S hapere, “The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy”, Philosophy of Science (December, 1982), 485-525.
T. Shinn, “Construction Théorique et Démarche Experimentale: Essai d’Analyse Sociale et &Eac.pistémologique de la Recherche”, Information sur les sciences sociales, Vol. 22, 3 (1983), 511-554.: li.J. A. Fodor, The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, MA: the MIT Press, 1983.
I. Mitroff, The Subjective Side of Science, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1974.
B. Latour, and S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts; London: Sage Library of Social Research, 1979.
D. Lestel, “Intélligence Artificielle et Anthropologie desäLaboratories”, MS, 8pp. D. Vervenee, D. De Waele, “Cognitive Modelling of Scientific Expertise in Laboratory Contexts”, Colloque E.A. S.S.T., Gent, Actes, 1984, 97-99. D. Vervenne. A. Heefer, D. De Waele, “Dynamic Representation Transformations for Knowledge Engineering in Laboratory Contexts”, Communicatie in cognitie, Gent,à werkdokument nr. 91 (1984). D. Vervenne, “Dynamic Dialogue-Acts in Scientific Expertise Contexts”, Department Logic and Epistemology, University of Ghent, 1984}
I. Prigogine, and I. Stengers, La Nouvelle Alliance, Paris: Gillimard, 1979.
T. Shinn, “Hiérarchies des chercheurs et formes des recherches” Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales no. 74, septembre 1988, 2-22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shinn, T. (1989). Cognitive Process and Social Practice: The Case of Experimental Macroscopic Physics. In: Fuller, S., de Mey, M., Shinn, T., Woolgar, S. (eds) The Cognitive Turn. Sociology of the Sciences a Yearbook, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7825-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7825-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4049-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7825-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive