Skip to main content

The Managerial Analysis of Public Infrastructure Investment Policies

  • Chapter
Public Choice
  • 91 Accesses

Abstract

The issue of investment processes whereby financial resources are allocated “à fonds perdus”, has not yet received much serious attention in the management or economics literature. Allocating resources “à fonds perdus” implies that no actor is deemed directly responsible for the production activities (and their outputs), which result from investment decisions. In other words, neither the decision makers, nor the economic actors who will benefit from an investment must bear clear responsibilities for the actual outputs generated by the investment. The traditional literature on project evaluation, whether for private or public organizations, implicitly assumes that the results of a private investment analysis or social cost benefit analysis for a number of projects will guide the behaviour of decision makers because these decision makers would benefit themselves from choosing the “best” projects. In reality, of course, this is not the case if resources are allocated “à fonds perdus”. If no one is a) directly rewarded for choosing the projects with, e.g., the highest expected profitability or net social benefits, or b) sanctioned for choosing projects with lower expected profitability or net social benefits, there is no reason to assume a priori that decision makers would actually prefer the best ranked projects according to an investment analysis.

senior research fellow with the Belgian national foundation for scientific research at the university of Antwerp (RUCA) and visiting senior research fellow at the university of Toronto. This paper was written when the author held a visiting appointment at Dalhousie University. The author is indebted to Prof. Dr. J. van den Broeck for critical comments on an earlier version of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, R.W., Influence of Integration and Diversity on the Investment process, in Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 15, September 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aharoni, Y., The Foreign Investment Decision Process, Division of Research, Harvard Business School, Boston, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, G.T., Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Little Brown, Boston, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H.I., Corporate Strategy, An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R.D., Legislators, Bureaucrats and Locational Decisions, in Public Choice, Vol. 37, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baliga, B. and Jaeger, A., Multinational Corporations: Control Systems and Delegation Issues, in Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J., Business Behavior, Value and Growth, MacMillan, New York, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, N., Strategic Planning in Conglomerate Companies, in Harvard Business Review, Vol. 43, No. 3, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A.A. and G.C. Means, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Macmillan, New York, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birgegard, L.E., The Project Selection Process in Developing Countries, A Study on the Public Investment Project Selection Process in Kenya, Zambia and Tanzania, Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J., Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A., The Economic Theory of Representative Government, Aldine Treatises in Modern Economics, Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C.V. and P.M. Jackson, Public Sector Economics, Martin Robertson, Oxford, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and G. Tullock, The Calculus of Consent, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, I. and R. Tollison (eds.), The Theory of Public Choice: II, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A., Managing Innovation Systems, A Study of the Process of Internal Corporate Venturing, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, E., The Behavioural Theory of the Firm and Top-Level Corporate Decisions, in Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 4, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Richard E., Industrial Organization, Corporate Strategy and Structure, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 18, March 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, Alfred D., Jr., Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of Industural Enterprise, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., Strategies of Control and Organizational Behaviour, in Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 8, March 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., J.G. March and J.P. Olson, A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice, in Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M.A., M.W. Jones-Lee and C.K. Rowley, X-Theory versus Management Discretion Theory, in Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., S.A. Marglin and S.K. Sen, U.N.I.D.O. Guidelines for Project Evaluation, United Nations, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A., Inside Bureaucracy, Boston, Mass., Little Brown, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, P., The Corporate Imagination, How Big Companies Make Mistakes, M.E. Sharper Armonk, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein and R. Keeney, Acceptable Risk, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John Kenneth, The New Industrial State, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imboden, N., A Management Approach to Project Appraisal and Evaluation with Special Reference to Non-Directly Productive Projects, Development Centre of the Organizaton for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P.M., The Political Economy of Bureaucracy, Totowa, Barnes and Noble, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L.R. and F. Thompson, Risk for Efficiency: Comprehensive Reform of Direct Regulation, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, No 4, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H., Beyond Economic Man, A New Foundation for Microeconomics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. and London, England, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H., On Bulls-Eye-Painting Economics, in Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, C.M., A Theory of Government Enterprise, in Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 84, No. 5, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Linstone, H.A., Multiple Perspectives for Decision Making, Bridging the Gap between Analysis and Action, North-Holland, New York, Amsterdam, Oxford, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, I.M.D. and J.A. Mirrlees, Manual of Industrial Project Analysis in Developing Countries, Vol. II, Social Cost-Benefit Analysis, O.E.C.D., Paris, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B.J., Choice, Complexity and Ignorance, An Enquiry into Economic Theory and the Practice of Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Londen, New York, Melbourne, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass, A., Muddy Waters, Harvard Univerrsity Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, R., The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism, Free Press, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCain, R.A., Competition, Information, Redundancy, X-Efficiency and the Cybernetics of the Firm, in Kyklos,Vol. 28, Fasc. 2, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, N. and A. Conway, World Product Mandates: The Need for Directed Search Strategies, in H. Etemad and L.S. Dulude (eds.), Managing the Multinational Subsidiary, Croom Helm, London, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., The Structure of Organizations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., Power In and Around Organizations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. and A. McHugh, Strategy Formation in an Adhocracy, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 2, June 1985, p. 160–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., D. Raisinghani and A. Theoret, The Structure of ‘Unstructured’ Decision Processes, in Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C., Public Choice, Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, New York, Melbourne, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murelius, O., An Institutional Approach to Project Analysis in Developing Countries, Development Centre Studies, O.C.D.E., Paris, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W.A., Bureaucrats and Politicians, in Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 18, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M., The Logic of Collective Action, Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W.G., The Relationship Between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control, in Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 22, March 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, P.K. and M. Salles (ed.), Social Choice and Welfare, Contributions to Economic Analysis, North-Holland, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D.W. and C.A. Nash, The Social Appraisal of Projects, A Text in Cost-Benefit Analysis, Macmillan Press, London, Basingstoke, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S., Towards a more general Theory of Regulation, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 19, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, J.M., D.J. Hickson, C.A. Hinings, C.D. Lee and R.E. Schneck, Uncertainty and Power in Organizations: A Strategic Contingency Model of Sub-Unit Functioning, Paper prepared for a Conference on Problems of Research on Organizational Sub-Unit Functioning, at the University of Alberta, Canada, March 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C, The Analysis of Goals in Complex Organizations, in American Sociological Review, Volume 26, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenker, E. and M. Bunamo, A Study of the Corps of Engineers’ Regional Pattern of Investments, in Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, April 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenk, C.R., Cognitive Simplification Processes in Strategic Decision-making, in Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A., Models of Man; Social and Rational, New York, Wiley, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A., Applying Information Technology to Organization Design, Public Administration Review, Vol. 33, May-June 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B.M., The Escalation of Commitment to a Course of Action, in Academy of Management Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, F., Social Cost-Benefit Analysis in Practice: Some Reflections in the Light of Case Studies Using Little Mirrlees Techniques, in World Development, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R., The Political Economy of Public Choice, Martin Robertson, Oxford, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H., Strategic Decision Analysis: Applied Decision Analysis and its Role in the Strategic Management Process, in Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D., Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G., The Politics of Bureaucracy, Public Affairs Press, Washington, D.C., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cauwenbergh, A. and K. Cool, Strategic Management in a New Framework, in Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancil, R.F. and C.H. Green, How C.E.O.’s Use Top Management Committees, in Harvard Business Review, Vol. 62, No. 1, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancil, R.F. and P. Lorange, Strategic Planning in Diversified Companies, in Harvard Business Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., Rationele Objectieven, Structurele Ineffectiviteit en Commitment in het Belgisch Zeehavenbeleid, een Multipele Perspectieven Benadering voor het Strategisch Investeringsbeleid in Complexe Organisaties, Antwerpse Lloyd, Antwerpen, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, C.E., The Social Psychology of Organizing, Addison Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A., Cost Benefit Analysis: Bastard Science and or Insidious Poison in the Body Politic?, in Journal of Public Economics, No. 1, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E., The Economics of Discretionary Behavior, Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization, Free Press, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Free Press, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verbeke, A. (1988). The Managerial Analysis of Public Infrastructure Investment Policies. In: Van Den Broeck, J. (eds) Public Choice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7784-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7784-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-7786-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7784-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics