Abstract
The single most important factor shaping Mill research in the past three decades has been Schumpeter’s basically negative assessment in his 1954 classic, History of Economic Analysis. We shall take account of this in a preliminary overview, though it will also be a constant point of reference for us.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Appleyard, Dennis, R., and Ingram, James C. (1979). “A Reconsideration of the additions to Mill’s `Great Chapter’.” History of Political Economy 11 (Winter): 459–476.
Barber, William J. (1967). A History of Economic Thought, Hammondsworth: Pengu in Books.
Blaug, Mark. (1958). Ricardian Economics. A Historical Study. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Blaug, Mark. (1962). Economic Thought in Retrospect. London: Heinemann; 4th ed. ( 1985 ), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blaug, Mark (1980). The Methodology of Economics, or How Economists Explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chipman, John S. (1965). “A Survey of the Theory of International Trade: Part I, The Classical Theory.” Econotnetrica 33 (July): 477–519.
Chipman, John S. (1979). “Mill’s `Superstructure’: How Well Does It Stand Up?” History of Political Economy 11 (Winter): 477–500.
Collini, S., Winch, D., and Burrow, J. (1983). That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-century Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dalai, A. J. (1979). “A Note on Mill’s Theory of International Values.” Journal of International Economics 9 (November): 583–587.
Corry, B. A. (1962). Money, Saying and Investment in English Economics:18001850. London: Macmillan.
De Marchi, Neil. (1970a). John Stuart Mill and the Development of English Economic Thought: A Study in the Progress of Ricardian Orthodoxy. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.
De Marchi, Neil. (1970b). “The Empirical Content and Longevity of Ricardian Economics.” Economica 37 (August): 257–276.
De Marchi, Neil. (1983). “The Case for James Mill.” In A.W. Coats (ed.), Methodological Controversy in Economics: Historical Essays in Honor of T. W. Hutchison. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Ekelund, Robert B. (1976). “A Short-Run Classical Model of Capital and Wages: Mill’s Recantation of the Wages Fund.” Oxford Economic Papers 28 (March): 66–85.
Ekelund, Robert B., and Tollison, Robert B. (1976). “The New Political Economy of J.S. Mill: The Means to Social Justice.” Canadian Journal of Economics IX (May): 213–231.
Hicks, J. R. (1976). Critical Essays in Monetary Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hollander, Samuel. (1973). The Economics of Adam Smith. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Hollander, Samuel. (1979). The Economics of David Ricardo. Toronto: University ofToronto Press.
Hollander, Samuel. (1982). “On the Substantive Identity of the Ricardian and NeoClassical Conceptions of Economic Organization: The French Connection in British Classicism.” Canadian Journal of Economics XV (November): 586–612.
Hollander, Samuel. (1985). The Economics of John Stuart Mill, 2 vols. Toronto: Universi- ty of Toronto Press.
Hunter, L.C. (1959). “Mill and Cairnes on the Rate of Interest.” Oxford Economic Papers XI (February):63–87.
Hutchison, T. W. (1978). On Revolution and Progress in Economic Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Losee, John. (1980). A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Losee, John. (1983). “Whewell and Mill on the Relation Between Philosophy of Science and History of Science.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 14 (June): 113–26.
Mirowski, P. (1984). “Physics and the Marginalist Revolution.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 8 (December): 361–79.
Mirowski, P. (1986). More Heat than Light ( Mimeo ). Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.
Mill, J.S. (1963). The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, John R. Robson (General ed., 25 volumes. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Negishi, Takashi. 1986 ). “Thornton’s Criticism of Equilibrium Theory and Mill.” History of Political Economy 18 (Winter): 567–577.
O’Brien, D. P. (1981). “Ricardian Economics and the Economics of David Ricardo.” Oxford Economic Papers 33 (November): 352–86.
Ricardo, David. (1951–73). Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, 11 vols., Piero Staffa (ed.), with the collaboration of M. H. Dobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Riley, J.M. (1983). Collective Choice and Individual Liberty. A Revisionist Interpretation of J. S. Mill’s Utilitarianism. Unpublished D. Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.
Robbins, L.C. (1967). “Introduction” to J.S. Mill, Essays on Economics and Society, Collected Works IV—V, pp. vii-xii.
Robson, J.J. (1968). The Improvement of Mankind: The Social and Political Thought of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schwartz, Pedro. (1972). The New Political Economy of J. S. Mill. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Smith, Vardaman R. (1985). “John Stuart Mill’s Famous Distinction Between Production and Distribution.” Economics and Philosophy 1 (October): 267–284.
Stigler, G.J. (1955). “The Nature and Role of Originality in Scientific Progress.” Economica XXII (November); reprinted
Stigler, G.J. (1965) in Essays in the History of Economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–15.
Stigler, G.J. (1982). “Mill on Economics and Society.” Review of J.S. Mill, Collected Works, vols. IV—V, in The Economist as Preacher and Other Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tucker, G. S. L. (1960). Progress and Profits in British Economic Thought. 16501850, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
West, E.G., and Hafer, R.W. (1978). “J.S. Mill, Unions, and the Wages Fund Recantation: A Reinterpretation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 93 (November): 603–619.
Arrow, Kenneth J., and D. A. Starrett. (1973). “Cost-and Demand-Theoretic Approaches to the Theory of Price Determination.” In J.R. Hicks and W. Weber (eds.), Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 129–148.
Frisch, Ragnar. (1981). “From Utopian Theory to Practical Applications: The Case of Econometrics.” American Economic Review 71 (December): 1–16.
Hicks, John. (1983). “”Revolutions“ in Economics.” Collected Essays in Economic Theory, vol. III. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 3–16.
Hicks, John. (1985). “Sraffa and Ricardo: A Critical View.” In G.A. Caravale (ed.), The Legacy of Ricardo. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 305–319.
Jaffé, William. (1983). Essays on Walras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jevons, William S. (1911). The Theory of Political Economy, 4th ed. London: Macmillan.
Hollander, Samuel. (1979). The Economics of David Ricardo. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Hollander, Samuel. (1985). The Economics of John Stuart Mill, 2 vols. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Hollander, Samuel. (1981). “Marxian Economics as General Equilibrium TheoryHistory of Political Economy 13 (1):121–155.
Hollander, Samuel. (1984). “The Wage Path in Classical Growth Models: Ricardo, Malthus and Mill.” Oxford Economic Papers 36: 200–212.
Marshall, Alfred. (1920). Principles of Economics, 8th ed. London: Macmillan.
McCulloch, J. R. (1825). Principles of Political Economy, 1st ed. Edinburgh: William and Charles Tait.
Mill, John Stuart. (1965). “Principles of Political Economy.” In J.M. Robson (ed.), Collected Works, vols. II and I II. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Mill, John Stuart. (1967). “The Nature, Origin and Progress of Rent
Mill, John Stuart. (1828). In J.M. Robson (ed.), Collected Works, vol. IV. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 161–180.
Mirowski, Philip. (1984). “Physics and the `Marginalist Revolution.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 8: 361–379.
Ricardo, David. (1951a). “Letters 1819—June 1821.” In Piero Sraffa (ed.), Works and Correspondence, vol. VIII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ricardo, David. (1951b). “Letters July 1821–1823” In Piero Sraffa (ed.), Works and Correspondence, vol. IX. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ricardo, David. (1951c). “Principles of Political Economy.” In Piero Sraffa (ed.), Works and Correspondence, vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robbins, Lionel C. (1970). The Evolution of Modern Economic Theory. London: Macmillan.
Walras, Léon. (1954). Elements of Pure economics, 4th definitive ed., W. Jaffé (ed.). London: Allen and Unwin.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Marchi, N. (1988). John Stuart Mill Interpretation Since Schumpeter. In: Thweatt, W.O. (eds) Classical Political Economy. Recent Economic Thought, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7782-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7782-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5815-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7782-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive