Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Nijhoff International Philosophy Series ((NIPS,volume 33))

  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter we saw it argued that in one’s own case, at least, forces, those which manifest themselves in one’s voluntary behaviour, are to be identified with will. And in the chapter before that we saw that whatever can be discovered about forces is to be accounted a discovery about the metaphysical reality underlying the world-representation constructed by commonsense and natural science between them. So we initiated, in the last chapter, the process of bringing to light the metaphysical character of nature. In this chapter I shall be concerned with Schopenhauer’s completion of the process; with his claim that in its “inner”, metaphysical being, the character of every natural phenomenon is “homogeneous” (WR I p.105) with one’s own, so that it is not just one’s own metaphysical nature, but the metaphysical nature of everything else too, that is will.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. InsiQht and Illusion p.71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ‘Wittgenstein, Schopenhauer and Ethics’ in Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures vol VII p.100.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Notice the expanded use of “motive”. In the last chapter it denoted the information-content relevant to explaining an action. But here it denotes a particular desire. Presumably in this expanded usage the motive for an action is everything relevant to its explanation i.e. both desire and belief.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maurice Mandelbaum suggests that Schopenhauer’s affinity is, in fact, mainly with Lemark who, like Schopenhauer, sees an organism as primarily a system of inner needs of which anatomical structure is the outward manifestation. See ‘The Physiological Orientation of Schopenhauer’s Epistemology’ in Schopenhauer: His Philosophical Achievement pp.50–68.

    Google Scholar 

  5. In ‘Actions, Reasons and Causes’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Young, J. (1987). The World as Will. In: Willing and Unwilling: A Study in the Philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer. Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7756-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7756-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8303-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7756-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics