Abstract
Modal concepts play a central role in the works of Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109).1 The notions of necessity and possibility are particularly important in the arguments which dominate his earlier writings: the ontological proof of the existence of God and the defense of freedom of the will. Later, Anselm’s conception of necessity is a crucial component of the extensive and innovative project in rational theology in which he proposes ‘necessary reasons’ for the redemption of mankind through the Incarnation. Although many of his writings had involved modal concepts, near the end of his career Anselm acknowledged the need to provide a thorough account of his ideas about possibility and necessity, in conjunction with the concepts of capacity and freedom.2 Of course he accepted the equivalences articulated by Aristotle between ‘necessarily’ and ‘not possibly not’ and between ‘possibly’ and ‘not necessarily not’; but he was interested in investigating what further considerations determine the meaning of modal predicates.3 A late incomplete treatise, the Lambeth Fragments, represents at least a partial fulfilment of Anselm’s intention to elaborate and defend his understanding of modality.4 Scholarly studies based primarily on his other writings tend to portray Anselm’s treatment of modal concepts as unclear or inconsistent, since the evidence in these writings, though substantial, is so scattered and sketchy that a plausible guiding rationale is difficult to discern.5 This difficulty hampers attempts to understand and assess a variety of Anselm’s best-known contentions: Did he intend to argue in the Proslogion and the Reply for the necessary existence of God?6 Or did he indeed deny that God has any properties necessarily, since he asserts in the Proslogion and in Cur Deus Homo that necessity involves constraint, and thus is incompatible with divine omnipotence?7 Yet if he held that we should not impute necessity to God, what could he mean by proposing ‘necessary reasons’ for the Incarnation?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Adams, R. M., ‘The Logical Structure of Anselm’s Arguments’, Philosophical Review 80 (1971), 28–54.
Anselm of Canterbury, Opera omnia I— V, ed. by F. S. Schmitt, T. Nelson, Edinburgh 1946–1951.
Barnes, J., The Ontological Argument (New Studies in the Philosophy of Religion), Macmillan, London 1972.
Boethius, Commentarii in librum Aristotelis Perihermeneias I—II,ed. by C. Meiser, Teubner, Lipsiae 1877–1880.
Boethius, Philosophiae consolatio, ed. by L. Bieler (Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina 94 ), Brebols, Turnholti 1957.
Charlesworth, M. J., St. Anselm’s Proslogion,Oxford University Press, Oxford 1965. Courtenay, W., ‘Necessity and Freedom in Anselm’s Conception of God’, in Analecta
Anselmiana IV, 2, ed. by H. Kohlenberger, Minerva, Frankfurt am Main 1975, pp. 36–64.
Du Cange, C. D., Glossarium Mediae et Infimae Latinitatis, Graz 1954.
Duns Scotus, Philosophical Writings, a selection edited and translated by A. Wolter, T. Nelson, Edinburgh 1962.
Ernout, A. and Meillet, A., Dictionnaire Etymologique de la Langue Latine: Histoire des Mots, Librairie C. Klincksieck, Paris 1967.
Henry, D. P., Commentary on De grammatico: The Historical-Logical Dimensions of a Dialogue of St. Anselm’s (Synthese Historical Library), D. Reidel, Dordrecht 1974.
Henry, D. P., The De grammatico of St. Anselm: The Theory of Paronymy, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana 1964.
Henry, D. P., The Logic of St. Anselm, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1967. Henry, D. P., Medieval Logic and Metaphysics, Hutchinson & Co, London 1972.
Hintikka, J., ‘The Modes of Modality’, in Proceedings of a Colloquium on Modal andMany-Valued Logics, Helsinki 23–26 August 1962 (Acta Philosophica Fennica 16 ), Societas Philosophica Fennica, Helsinki 1963, pp. 65–81.
Hintikka, J., Time and Necessity: Studies in Aristotle’s Theory of Modality, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1973.
Hopkins, J., A Companion to the Study of St. Anselm, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 1972.
Hunt, R. W., ‘Studies on Priscian in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries’, Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies 1 (1941–1943), 194–231.
Kneale, W. and M., The Development of Logic,Oxford University Press, Oxford 1962. Knuuttila, S., ‘Time and Modality in Scholasticism’, this volume, pp. 163–257.
Kripke, S., ‘Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic’, in Proceedings of a Colloquium on Modal and Many-Valued Logics, Helsinki 23–26 August 1962 (Acta Philosophica Fennica 16 ), Societas Philosophica Fennica, Helsinki 1963, pp. 83–94.
La Croix, R. A., Proslogion II and III: A Third Interpretation of Anselm’s Argument, E. J. Brill, Leiden 1972.
Liddell, H. G. and Scott, R., A Greek-English Lexicon, revised and augmented by M. S. Jones with R. McKenzie, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1976.
Malcolm, N., ‘Anselm’s Ontological Arguments’, Philosophical Review 69 (1960), pp. 41–62, reprinted in A. Plantinga (ed.), The Ontological Argument, Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y. 1965, pp. 136–159.
Matthews, G. B., ‘On Conceivability in Anselm and Malcolm’, Philosophical Review 70 (1961), 110–111.
Owen, G. E. L., ‘A Proof in the PERI IDEON’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 77 (1957), 103–111.
Peter Damian, De divina omnipotentia e altri opusculi,ed. by P. Brezzi and B. Nardi (Edizioni nazionale dei classici del pensiero italiano 5), Firenze 1943.
Peters, F. E., Greek Philosophical Terms, New York University Press, New York, University of London Press, London 1967.
Plantinga, A. (ed.), The Ontological Argument, Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y. 1965. Priscian, Prisciani Grammatici Caesariensis Institutionum grammaticarum libri XVIH ex recensione Martini Hertzii (Grammatici latini ex recensione H. Keilii, II, III), Teubner, Lipsiae 1855–1859.
Rhodes, R. M., The Ancient Libraries of Canterbury and Dover, Cambridge 1903. Roques, R., Pourquoi Dieu S’est Fait Homme, texte, introd., trad. et notes (Sources Chrétiennes 91), Les Éditions du Cerf, Paris 1963.
Schmitt, F. S. (ed.), Ein neues unvollendetes Werk des hl. Anselm von Canterbury (Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters 33, 3), Verlag der aschendorffschen Verlagsbuchhandlung, Münster 1936.
Schmitt, F. S., ‘Zur Chronologie der Werke des hl. Anselm von Canterbury’, Révue Bénédictine 44 (1932), 322–350.
Serene, E., Anselm’s Philosophical Fragments: A Critical Examination (Ph. D. Diss., Cornell University 1974 ).
Southern, R. W. and Schmitt, F. S. (eds.), The Memorials of St. Anselm (Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi 1), Oxford University Press, London 1969.
Walde, A. and Hofmann, J. B., lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch I—II,3. Aufl., Carl Winter, Heidelberg 1938–1954.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Serene, E.F. (1980). Anselm’s Modal Conceptions. In: Knuuttila, S. (eds) Reforging the Great Chain of Being. Synthese Historical Library, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7662-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7662-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8360-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7662-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive