Skip to main content

Soviet Military Objectives and Capabilities in the 1980s

  • Chapter
World Communism at the Crossroads

Abstract

Few areas of U.S. public policy are characterized by greater controversy than national security, and this is especially true today. Views range all the way from the obsolescence of military force in the nuclear era to matching and surpassing all the military capabilities of our potential enemies and then having a substantial margin for error. Accomplished patriotic citizens can be found all across the spectrum, both inside and outside the government, and yet there is remarkable consensus about the underlying objections of national security: we seek to avoid war, especially nuclear war, and we seek to maintain the basic quality of life in the West, especially our extraordinary individual freedom and our unprecedented standard of living. Thus, to a considerable extent, the merit of one position or another depends on different assessments of the facts and different predictions about the consequences of alternative courses of action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. NSC 68: A Report to the National Security Council,” Naval War College Review 27 (May-June 1975): 51–108.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richard Pipes, “Why the Soviet Union Thinks It Could Fight and Win a Nuclear War,” Commentary (July 1977): 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leon Goure, Foy D. Kohler, and Mose L. Harvey, The Role of Nuclear Forces in Current Soviet Strategy (Coral Gables, Fla.: Center for Advanced International Studies, University of Miami, 1974), p. x.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. W. Kulski, The Soviet Union in World Affairs: A Documented Analysis 1964–1972 ( Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1973 ), p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. A. Arbatov, article in Kommunist 3, cited in Dimitri Simes. A. Arbatov, article in Kommunist 3, cited in Dimitri Simes, “Detente and Conflict: Soviet Foreign Policy 1972–1977, ” Washington Paper No. 44, 1977, p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. D. Sokolovskiy, Soviet Military Strategy, 3rd ed., edited and with analysis and commentary by Harriet Fast Scott (New York: Crane, Russak, 1975 ), p. 184.

    Google Scholar 

  7. National Strategic Information Center, Understanding the Soviet Military Threat, Agenda Paper No. 6 (New York: National Strategic Information Center, 1977 ), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  8. William T. Lee, “Understanding the Soviet Military Threat: How CIA Estimates Went Astray,” in National Strategic Information Center, Understanding the Soviet Military Threat.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Steven Rosefielde, Chapter 2, p. 43, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. A. Kissinger, “What in the Name of God Is Strategic Superiority? What Is the Significance of It Politically, Militarily, and Operationally at These Levels of Numbers? What Do You Do with It?” Moscow press conference (July 3, 1974 ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  12. U.S. Congress, Senate, “American and Soviet Armed Services, Strengths Compared, 1970–76,” Congressional Record (August 5, 1977 ): S14063–104.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lynn Etheridge Davis and Warner R. Schilling, “All You Ever Wanted to Know about MIRV and ICBM Calculations but Were Not Cleared to Ask,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 17, no. 2 (Júne 1973): 207–42.

    Google Scholar 

  14. U.S. Congress, Senate, Committee on Armed Services, NATO and the New Soviet Threat, report of Senator Sam Nunn and Senator Dewey F. Bartlett, 94th Coing. 1st sess., January 24, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Joseph D. Douglass, Jr., “Soviet Nuclear Strategy in Europe: A Selective Targeting Doctrine?” Strategic Review 5 (Fall 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Director of Naval Intelligence and the Chief of Information, Understanding Soviet Naval Developments, 3rd ed., NAVSO P-3560 ( Washington, D.C.: Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, January 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Central Intelligence Agency, Prospects for Soviet Oil Production (ER 77–10270, April 1977), and Prospects for Soviet Oil Production, A Supplemental Analysis (ER 77–10425, July 1977 ), Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parker, P. (1980). Soviet Military Objectives and Capabilities in the 1980s. In: Rosefielde, S. (eds) World Communism at the Crossroads. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7631-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7631-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-7633-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7631-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics