Abstract
Anxious to counter Dr. Johnson’s belittling of Scotland’s contribution to polite letters, as was his want, Boswell, his future biographer, once reminded him, “But we have Kames.” “You have Karnes! Well, keep him, Ha, Ha, Ha!” rejoined the literary monarch of the south, chuckling at his own pun; “We don’t envy you him!”1
Kames made nearly the first attempt [among 18th century Scots] at writing English; and ere long Hume, Robertson, Smith and a whole host of followers attracted hither the eyes of all Europe. (T. Carlyle)
He did more to promote the interests of philosophy and belles lettres in Scotland than all the men of law had done for a century before. (Ramsay of Ochtertyre)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Boswell, Life of Johnson, p. 392.
Tytler, II, App., 81–85. See also Randall, op. cit., pp. 75–77.
Boswell, Life of Johnson, p. 414.
Ramsay, I, 319; also Harold W. Thompson, The Man of Feeling (London, 1931), pp. 21, 43 and 148.
See John H. Millar, Scottish Prose in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Glasgow, 1912), pp. 4ff; Henry G. Graham, Scottish Men of Letters in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1901), Ch. I; and Ramsay, I, Ch. I, esp. pp. 1–11.
Graham, op. cit., pp. If..
See also J. H. Millar, op. cit., pp. 4f.
Henry Meikle, “Some Aspects of Later Seventeenth-Century Scotland.” David Murray Lectures (Glasgow: Glasgow University Press, 1947), vol. LXXIII.
For further information on these men and their contributions, see, beside the Meikle lecture referred to above, the Dictionary of National Biography, under the respective names, and also George Chalmer’s, Thomas Ruddiman (1674–1757), Notes on his Life (London, 1794). Pitcaime also receives attention in Chalmer’s biography. He has recently been the subject of study by Scottish scholars, but the present author knows of no recent publications on the subject.
Founded in 1682, this Advocates Library ¡ª adjacent to Parliament Hall, seat of the Scottish High Courts, and readily accessible to it by an underground passage ¡ª had, even at this early date, one of the best collections of historical materials, juridical and non-juridical ¡ª much of it in manuscript form ¡ª to be found anywhere. It has been said that it is to Scottish history what the Bodleian is to English history. It is still, as the National Library of Scotland, unique among Scottish libraries and ¡ª for all things Scottish ¡ª among libraries everywhere. It has recently received a new home, most of it built on the original site on George IV. Street, South.
The most pertinent works here are David Daiches, The Paradox of Scottish Culture: The Eighteenth Century Experience (London, 1964) and James Kinsley (ed.), Scottish Poetry: A Critical Survey (London, 1955) ¡ª a suggestive collection of essays ¡ª especially chapters V and VI. See also John Speirs, The Scots Literary Tradition (London, 1940), and David Craig, Scottish Literature and the Scottish People: 16801830 (Cambridge, 1961). An older, more general work of pertinence here is George Gregory Smith, Scottish Literature: Its Character and Influence (London, 1919). These works and their importance were brought to my attention in conversations with Ian S. Ross. See also Ross’s article in the Philological Quarterly previously referred to, pp. 615f.
Tytler, Memoirs, 2nd ed. (Edinburgh, 1814), vol. I, p. 223. Also Supplement (1809), p. 13.
The origin of the Edinburgh Philosophical Society can be traced back indirectly to 1718, in a group calling themselves “An Association for Improving Each Other in Classical Lore,” to be reorganized or followed ¡ª it is not clear exactly which, but at any rate the membership is much the same ¡ª in 1731 by the “Society for the Improvement of Medical Knowledge,” under the guidance of Alexander Munro, the elder. This in turn became in 1737, under the leadership of Colin Maclaurin, the “Edinburgh Society for the Improvement of Arts and Sciences,” the nature of its activities now considerably broadened, only to languish with the death of Maclaurin in 1746 and with the disturbances accompanying the rising of the ‘45. It was, however, to be revived soon after this, chiefly under the leadership of Hume, Karnes and Alexander Munro, and soon became known as the Edinburgh Philosophical Society. By 1752, Kames could write to his friend Cullen that he had “got in good measure the management” of the society. In 1769, he was elected its president, an office he continued to hold apparently to the end of his life. In 1783, within a year after Kames’s death, this society was reorganized into the Royal Society of Edinburgh (R.S.E.), with a charter from the Crown. See Tytler, I, 184f. and II, 86n.; Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (Edinburgh, 1788), Vol. I, pp. 3–100; Edinburgh Philosophical Society, Essays and Observations, Physical and Literary, vol. I (1754), Preface; and Scots Magazine, IV (1742), p. 94, XVI (1754), pp. 184f., and LXVI (1804), pp. 421–423. See also McElroy, op. cit., pp. 27–31 and 34–40.
The Autobiography of Dr. Alexander Carlyle of Inveresk, 1722–1805, ed. John H. Burton (London, 1910 ed.), p. 312.
There is conflicting evidence relating to Kames’s membership in this club. Boswell reports Kames as telling him that he was a member (Private Papers, XV, p. 284). Available records do not, however, list him among members at any time and some contemporaries, including Ramsay, say he was not a member. McElroy, op. cit., pp. 23f., arrived at the conclusion, on careful examination of all available evidence, that the latter view is correct and that there must, therefore, have been either a confusion with some other society or a slip of memory.
Scots Magazine, XXXIII (1771), pp. 340–44.
This college was actually chartered and its fellows already named but the scheme failed for lack of funds. See Scots Magazine, XV, p. 53, and XXXIII (1771), p. 341.
Carlyle, Autobiography, pp. 311f. and Stewart, Works, vol. x, pp. 109f. and 203207.
Tytler, I, 176f and 184, and 175–184 generally. See also on the Select Society Ramsay, I, 321n.; Scots Magazine, XXIII (1761), pp. 389f. and 440f.; and Mc Elroy, op. cit., pp. 48–67 passim.
This “plan” proved rather abortive, perhaps because of its somewhat utopian character, but the list of its directors and honorary or “extraordinary” directors is impressive, containing some of the most prominent literary and public figures of the day. There were three Lords of Session, four Earls, five or six prominent advocates, several clergymen and university professors, merchant John Fordyce, architect John Adam, surgeon James Russell and Lord Elibank. See Scots Magazine, XXIII (1761), pp. 440f; also XVI, p. 184 and XVII, p. 126. See on this matter also Rae, Life of Adam Smith, pp. 107–20, and McElroy, op. cit., pp. 55ff.
The Mirror, No. 83 (Feb. 22, 1780). The Mirror was one of several Scottish literary periodicals that flourished at about this time. It was founded in 1779 and was published semi-weekly, Jan. 23, 1779 to May 27, 1780. William Craig, a Lord of Session, was perhaps its ablest contributor and next to its principal editor, Henry Mackenzie ¡ª the “man of feeling” ¡ª apparently also its most frequent contributor. It was followed in 1785 by the Lounger, also under Mackenzie’s editorship. The Bee, apparently of somewhat lesser significance, won considerable popularity a few years later. Earlier, beginning in or about 1753, there was the World, a periodical of which Karnes spoke highly. All of these were built more or less on the pattern of the earlier English periodicals, the Spectator, the Guardian and the Rambler. The first Edinburgh Review, a periodical on a different style, reached only two numbers, July and December, 1755. Among its contributors, all remaining anonymous, are known to have been Adam Smith, Hugh Blair, William Robertson, and allegedly but not certainly also David Hume. Jeffrey’s Edinburgh Review, destined to have a far greater influence on both letters and politics, and a long life, was not founded until 1802, and thus belongs to another era.
Tytler, II, 157n., quoting William Forbes, Life of Beattie.
J. H. Millar, op. cit., pp. 177f.
Edinburgh Magazine and Review, vol. I (1774), pp. 310f. See also infra, p. 181, n. 12.
Ramsay, I, 195.
For a general characterization of the Sketches, see infra, p. 181, n. 12. For Kames’s expression of his expectations for this work, see infra, p. 149.
Edinburgh Philosophical Society, Essays and Observations, vol. I, Article 1.
Kames, The Progress of the Flax Husbandry in Scotland (Edinburgh, 1766), reprinted in Scots Magazine, XXVIII (Jan., 1766), pp. 15–27.
On the Macpherson matter, see letter, Kames to Elizabeth Montagu, 16 Feb., 1772, quoted in Randall, op. cit., pp. 112f.
See Scots Magazine, Vol. XXI (1759), pp. 660f. On Adam Smith’s lectures at Edinburgh see especially, W. R. Scott, Adam Smith as Student and Professor (Glasgow, 1937) Ch. V.
See Boswell, Life of Johnson, pp. 790f., and Tytler, I, 198.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1971 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lehmann, W.C. (1971). The High-Court Judge and the World of Letters: Historical and Biographical. In: Henry Home, Lord Kames, and the Scottish Enlightenment: A Study in National Character and in the History of Ideas. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées / International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 41. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7582-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7582-9_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-0039-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7582-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive