Skip to main content

The Style of the Grotesques a Description of Linguistic Subversion

  • Chapter
Homeopathy of the Absurd

Part of the book series: Bibliotheca Neerlandica Extra Muros ((BNEM,volume 1))

  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

The prose style of Van Ostaijen generally encounters either critical praise or condemnation, with hardly any nuances between these two extremes. He is either lauded as a master of language with the poet’s sensitivity for word and phrase, or he is dismissed as an unimpressive charlatan whose verbal inventiveness degenerates into tasteless puns. In both views the common denominator is that the style shows a highly cognizant employment of language. An examination of the stylistic and narrative characteristics will support the contention that this style is not a gratuitous acrostic diversion, but that the tales constitute, in fact, a subtle linguistic construction. They are examples of what Wolfgang Kayser called das sprachliche Kunstwerk. Kayser defines the verbal work of art as “[eine] in sich geschlossenes sprachliches Gefüge.” The discussion may, perhaps, demonstrate how tightly knit these tales are and how the technical expertise proceeds to negate its own carefully constructed artifice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. This essay, “Un debat littéraire,” is not included in the collected works, but was published previously in book form. Paul van Ostaijen, Krities proza II ( Antwerpen, Utrecht, 1931 ), p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  2. This theory was primarily developed in an essay on Pasternak: Roman Jakobson, “Randbemerkungen zur Prosa des Dichters Pasternak,” Slavische Rundschau, VII, No. 6, 357–374. If not otherwise indicated, the quotations from Jakobson are from this essay. See also Roman Jakobson and Morris Halle, Fundamentals of Language (’s-Gravenhage, 1956 ), pp. 76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ostaijen, Krities proza II, p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kayser, Das Groteske, p 132.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Albert Gleizes and Jean Metzinger, Du Cubisme (Paris, 1912), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The quotation is from a catalogue for an exposition of this group’s work in Amsterdam’s Stedelijk Museum, 6 July to 25 September 1951. de stijl: cat. 81 (Amsterdam, 1951), pp. 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vassily Kandinsky, Ober das Geistige in der Kunst (München 1912), p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paul van Ostaijen, “Lambrecht Lambrechts: kleine keuze onuitgegeven gedichten. Henri Bruning: De sirkel. Verzen. Gerard van Duyn: De verlaten stad. Roel Houwink: •ovellen,” Het Overzicht, Nos. 22–24 (February 1925).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paul van Ostaijen, “Beeldende Kunst Marten Nelsen,” Ons Land,IV (28 January 1917). See also his essay “Schoone Kunsten. Oscar en Floris Jespers,” Ons Land, IV (10 March 1917). In a letter from Berlin to Boris Jespers, Van Ostaijen writes quite seriously about the problematic nature of the caricature, even alluding to what he calls a “classical caricature.” This letter is in the possession of Floris Jespers’ grandson, Henri-Floris Jespers, who showed it to me and allowed me to quote from it.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baudelaire in a projected preface to his Fleurs du Mal; included in Charles Baudelaire, Fleurs du Mal,ed. Antoine Adam (Paris, 1961), p. 249. This is the passage which was singled out by Hugo Friedrich as being especially significant and apocalyptic for modern poetry in Die Struktur der modernen Lyrik (Hamburg, 1956), p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Salomon Friedlaender, Logik; Die Lehre vom Denken (Berlin, Leipzig, n.d.), p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roger Shattuck, The Banquet Years (New York, 1961), pp. 334–335.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paul Rodenko, “De andere Paul van Ostaijen,” Nieuwe Rotterdamsche Courant, April 9, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1970 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beekman, E.M. (1970). The Style of the Grotesques a Description of Linguistic Subversion. In: Homeopathy of the Absurd. Bibliotheca Neerlandica Extra Muros, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7580-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7580-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-0038-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7580-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics