Abstract
Malebranche gave up the notion that interaction occurred between mind and body. Like Foucher, numerous Cartesians thought that this interaction was obvious and thus retained it in their expositions of Cartesianism. These philosophers who do not offer occasionalist solutions to Cartesian problems are referred to as orthodox Cartesians, though there is no insistence upon the term, orthodox. As a matter of fact, these philosophers did consider themselves to be orthodox expositors of Cartesianism in contrast to someone like Malebranche who went so far as to assert that he was not a strict Cartesian. However, the orthodox Cartesians could not retain all the principles which seemed to underlie Cartesianism. They retained the strict dualism between mind and matter, and thus could explain interaction only by dispensing with the causal likeness principle. Concurrently, in order to contend that mind could know matter which was utterly different from it, they also had to deny the epistemological likeness principle.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A study of Desgabets and many writings not published during his lifetime are found in: Lemaire, Paul Le Cartésianisme chez les Bénédictins. Dom Robert Desgabets son système son influence et son école d’après plusieurs manuscrits et des documents rares ou inédits (Paris: Felix Alcan, 1901). See also: Bouillier, Francisque Histoire de la philosophie cartésienne2 volumes (Paris: Durand, 1854).
Desgabets, Robert. Critique de la Critique de la Recherche de la vérité où l’on découvre le chemin qui conduit aux connoissances solides. Pour servir de réponse à la Lettre d’un académicien (Paris: Jean Du Puis, 1675). Hereafter referred to as Critique de la Critique.
Quotations which follow from the Supplément à la philosophie de M. Descartes are taken from the many selections reproduced in Lemaire, op. cit.
Foucher, Simon. Nouvelle dissertation sur la Recherche de la venté, contenant la Reponse à la Critique de la Critique de la Recherche de la venté, où l’on découvre les erreurs des dogmatistes, tant anciens que nouveaux, avec une discution particuliere du grand principe des cartesiens. (Paris: Robert de la Caille, 167g), 30–31.
La Forge, Louis de. Traité de l’âme humaine, de ses facultés et fonctions et de son union avec le corps, d’après les principes de Descartes (Paris: Girard, 1666). On La Forge see: Balz, Albert B. A., “Louis de La Forge and the Critique of Substantial Forms” in Cartesian Studies (New York: Columbia University Press, 1951); Bouillier, Francisque Histoire de la philosophie cartesienne (Paris: Durand, 1854 ); and Damiron, M. Ph., Essai sur l’histoire de la philosophie en France, au XVIIe siècle ( Paris: Hachette, 1846 ).
Traité de l’âme humaine,127; Quoted in Damiron, op. cit., II, 40.
Traité de l’âme humaine13o; Quoted in Daniiron op. cit.II, 40.
Rohault, Jacques. Traité de physique ( Paris: VVe de C. Savreux, 1671 ).
Rohault, Jacques. Rohault’s System of Natural Philosophy, Illustrated with Dr. Samuel Clarke’s Notes taken mostly out of Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophy, With Additions. Done into English by John Clarke. 2 volumes (London: James Knapton, 1723). Hereafter referred to as System.
Critique64–66, 76–80. (Because of a pagination mistake there are no pages 67–75.)
On Régis see: Bouillier, op. cit., Damiron, op. cit., Mouy, op. cit.; and Fontenelle, Bernard le Bovier de. “Éloge de Régis” in Oeuvres de Fontenelle, (Paris: Jean-Francois Bastien, 1790 ), Tome VI.
Régis, Pierre-Sylvain. Système de philosophie contenant la logique la métaphysique la physique et la morale 3 volumes (Lyon: Denys Thierry 1690) I 73–74. Hereafter referred to as Système.
Du Hamel, Jean. Réflexions critiques sur le système cartésien de la philosophie de Mr. Régis (Paris: E. Couterot, 1692), 33-35.
Régis, Pierre-Sylvain. Réponse aux Réflexions critiques de M. Du Hamel sur le système cartésien de la philosophie de M. Régis (Paris: J. Cusson, 1692), 8—i i.
Du Hamel, Jean. Lettre de Monsieur Du Hamel, Ancien Professeur de Philosophie de l’Université de Paris, pour servir de Replique à Monsieur Régis (Paris: publisher unknown, 1699), 16.
On Le Grand see: Bouillies, op. cit.; Lee, Sidney, Dictionary of National Biography (New York: Macmillan 19o9); and Nouvelle biographie générale depuis les temps les plus reculés jusqu’a nos jours (Paris: Firmin Didot Frères, Fils et C1e, 1859 ).
Le Grand, Antoine, An Entire Body of Philosophy, According to the Principles of the Famous Renate des Cartes, in three Books: I. The Institution,… II. The History of Nature,… III. A Dissertation of the Want of Sense and Knowledge in Brute Animals,... (London: Samuel Roycraft, 1694) •
Church, Ralph W. A Study in the Philosophy of Malebranche (London: Unwin, 1931); Damiron, op. cit.; Delbos, Victor. “La controverse d’Arnauld et de Malebranche sur la nature et l’origine des idées” in Etude de la philosophie de Malebranche (Paris: Bloud and Gay, 1924); Kremer, Elmar J. Malebranche and Arnauld: The Controversy Over the Nature of Ideas. (New Haven: Yale University Ph.D. Dissertation, unpublished, 1861); Lovejoy, A. O. “`Representative Ideas’ in Malebranche and Arnauld,” Mind XXXII, no. 128, 1923, 449–464; and Malebranche, Nicolas. Recueil de toutes les réponses du père Malebranche… à M. Arnauld… 4 volumes ( Rotterdam: R. Leers, 1694 ).
Arnauld, Antoine. La Logique, ou l’art de penser ( Paris: C. Saureux, 1662 ).
Arnauld, Antoine. Des vrayes et des fausses idées, contre ce qu’enseigne l’auteur de la Recherche de la vérité ( Cologne: Nicolas Schouten, 1683 ).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1966 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Watson, R.A. (1966). The Orthodox (Non-Occasionalist) Cartesian Way of Ideas. In: The Downfall of Cartesianism 1673–1712. Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idees / International Archives of the History of Ideas. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7557-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7557-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-0023-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7557-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive