Skip to main content
  • 45 Accesses

Abstract

Although Benedetti’s report to the emperor marked the conclusion of his ambassadorial duties, his connection with Franco-Prussian diplomacy did not cease with the outbreak of hostilities. Indeed, within the week following the official French declaration of war he was the subject of numerous diplomatic conversations and press reports. This notoriety was occasioned by Bismarck’s decision to make public the alliance and compensation draft treaty which Benedetti had left with him in late August 1866. Anxious to influence favorably the attitude of the British government toward Prussia, the chancellor used this unique document to further his aims.1 When Ambassador Bernstorff had tried on 19 July to persuade Gladstone and Granville to oppose an intended French blockade of the German coast, he had briefly alluded to the existence of the Benedetti draft. The small impression this reference had made upon the British statesmen did not satisfy the chancellor, and he decided upon a more persuasive course to win Britain’s sympathies as well as those of the other powers.2 Ambassador Bernstorff was instructed to arrange the publication of the Benedetti draft in the English press. The release was to be prefaced by a statement to the effect that Prussia had refused to avoid the war at the cost of betrayal of her south German allies and Belgium.3 Furthermore, Bernstorff was urged not to indicate too precisely the date of origin of the document.’ Bismarck was anxious to convey the impression that the imperial government had never abandoned its hope, even after the London Treaty of 1867, to annex both Luxemburg and Belgium. Little time was lost in complying with the chancellor’s order and on Sunday evening, 24 July, Krause called on Delane, the influential editor of The Times, at his rooms at Serjeant’s Inn.2 During the interview the counsellor avoided mention of the precise date of the document and gave Delane to understand that it had been drafted after the creation of the North German Confederation. In reply to the editor’s repeated efforts to pinpoint the date, Krause intimated that the proposal had been made during the Belgian railway dispute of 1869. Delane finally accepted Krause’s explanation and satisfied himself that the copy was authentic.3 His publication of the document next day greatly aided Bismarck in his efforts to further Prussia’s cause.4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cf. Thile to Balan, Berlin, 22 December 1866, SASS, PJ, CCX VII, Heft 3 (September 1929), 268: “Meanwhile the Luxemburg question remains for us a noli me tangere. It will be kept for eventual use for or against N[apoleon].”

    Google Scholar 

  2. See explanatory note in BGW, VIb, 418–419; cf. Gladstone to Victoria, London, 25 July 187o, VICTORIA, Letters, 2nd series, ed. G. Buckle (London, 1926), II, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Efforts to publish the so-called Benedetti Memorandum in the English press were part of a general plan to gain support of public opinion in England for the Prussian and German cause. Oral intructions from the chancellor to Bernstorff were relayed on or before 19 July by legation counsellor Krause, who probably carried the copy of the draft treaty to London (Bernstorff to Bismarck, London, 19 July 187o, I.A.A.a. 14.; Bismarck to Bernstorff, Berlin, 23 July 187o, BGW, VIb, 419, T.). Arrangements were also made to send copies of the document to most of the European cabinets (Busc’’, Tagebuchblätter, I, 54 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bismarck to Bernstorff, Berlin, 23 July 1870, BGW, VIb, 420, T.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bernstorff to Delane, London, 24 July r87o, The History of The Times (London, 19351939), II, 424.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For Krause’s report on the interview with Delane see K. RHEINDORF, England und der deutsch-französische Krieg 1870/71 (Bonn, 1923), p. 172; E. Cook, Delane of “The Times” (London, 1915 ), pp. 226–227.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Times (London), Monday, 25 July 1870, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thile to Balan, Berlin, 24 July 1870, SASS, PJ, CCXVII, Heft 3 (September 1929), 272; cf. Nothomb to Juste, Berlin, 28 August 1870, BAE, Papiers Nothomb, film 117, dossier 245, section 21; Devaux to Beyens, Brussels, 24 July 1870, BEYENS, II, 457–458.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Loftus to Granville, Berlin, 25 July 1870, PRO FO 64/689, no. 81; LOFTUS, I, 113–115.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Loftus to Granville, Berlin, 26 July 1870, PRO FO 64/689, no. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lyons to Granville, Paris, 26 July 187o, NEWTON, I, 303–304.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gramont to La Valette, Paris, 27 July 1870, AD, 1871–72, I, 282–283.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Note du Journal officiel,“ Paris, 28 July 1870, ibid., 285–286; cf. de MAZADE, ”Chronique de la quinzaine,“ Revue des deux mondes, LXXXVIII (1 August 1870), pp. 747–748.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benedetti to Gramont, Paris, 29 July 1870, AD, 1871–72, I, 201–211. This letter was published in the Journal officiel on 3o July 1870 and was annexed to a circular of the foreign minister to French diplomatic representatives abroad (Gramont to diplomatic agents, Paris, 3o July 187o, FAE CP, Espagne/876). See also T. JUSTE, M. de Bismarck et Napoléon III; it propos des provinces belges et rhénanes (Brussels, 1871 ), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gramont to La Valette, Paris, 29 July 187o, AD, 1871–72, I, 289.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bismarck to Bernstorff, Berlin, z8 July 1870, BGW, VIb, 428–429.

    Google Scholar 

  17. GREAT BRITAIN, 3 Hansard, CCIII (1870), 926; Granville to Ponsonby, London, 26 July 1870, VICTORIA, II, 52–53.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bismarck did not think it necessary to reply to Benedetti’s version because he felt that the French government had not succeeded in repudiating the Prussian charges (Bismarck to diplomatic agents, Berlin, io August 187o, Das Staatsarchiv [Hamburg: 1861–1919], XIX, 161–162 ).

    Google Scholar 

  19. The Times (London), Wednesday, 25 October 1871, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. REINACH, “Un chantage historique. La fondation de l’empire allemand et les papiers de Cerçay,” Récits et portraits contemporains (Paris, 1915), pp. 225–257, offers an account of the discovery of the papers as well as of the use to which they were put by Bismarck. An inventory of the Cerçay Papers has been included as an appendix in ODG, XII.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ROTHAN, La politique française en 1866, p. 8, ft. r, indicates that the documents were transferred to Berlin on 8 November 187o. They were returned to France in accordance with Article 245 of the Versailles Treaty.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See The Times (London), Wednesday, 25 October 187x, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1965 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fletcher, W.A. (1965). Diplomacy of Distortion. In: The Mission of Vincent Benedetti to Berlin 1864–1870. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7547-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7547-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-0018-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7547-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics