Skip to main content

Abstract

The first decision any historiographer has to make is where to begin his story. Unless he wants this decision to be completely arbitrary, he should also be prepared to justify it by a clear conception of the unifying theme for his account. Unfortunately, this demand cannot be satisfied so easily in the case of the history of phenomenology. The difficulties of stating point-blank what phenomenology is are almost notorious.1 Even after it had established itself as a movement conscious of its own identity, it kept reinterpreting its own meaning to an extent that makes it impossible to rely on a standard definition for the purpose of historical inclusion or exclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1965 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spiegelberg, H. (1965). Introduction. In: The Phenomenological Movement. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7394-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7394-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-2085-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7394-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics