Abstract
Considerable research has found that adding audio to desktop conferencing improves problem-solving, but that there is no additional benefit from adding video. This paper describes an experiment that supports these earlier findings, while suggesting that video may provide significant benefit when used in tasks involving speakers with different priorities and different linguistic capabilities. The level of conflict in the experimental setting is consistent with that found in work settings, but is higher than that in most experimental situations. Tasks involving a mix of native and non-native English speakers are not universal but may be increasingly common. Thus, these findings provide encouragement to those working to improve videoconferencing technology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Argyle, M. (1969).Social interaction. Methuen.
Buxton, W. (1992). Telepresence: Integrating Shared Task and Person Spaces. Reprinted in R. M. Baecker (Ed.),Readings in Groupware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993, pp. 816–822.
Chapanis, A., Ochsman, R., Parrish, R., & Weeks, G. (1972). Studies in interactive communication: I. The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problem solving.Human Factors,14, pp. 487–509.
Doerry, E. (1996). An empirical comparison of copresent and technologically-mediated interaction based on communicative breakdown. Doctoral dissertation. Available as CIS-TR-96–01, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Dourish, P., & Bly, S. (1992). Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group.Proc. CHI’92, pp. 541–547.
Egido, C. (1988). Videoconferencing as a technology to support group work: A review of its failure.Proc. CSCW’88, pp. 13–24.
Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., & Chalfonte, B. L. (1990). The Video Window System in informal communication.Proc. CSCW’90, pp. 1–11.
Ichikawa, Y., Okada, K., Jeong, G., Tanaka, S., & Matsushita, Y. (1995). MAJIC videoconferencing system: Experiments, evaluation and improvement.Proc. ECSCW ‘95, pp. 279–292.
Inoue, T., Kobayashi, T., Okada, K., & Matsushita, Y. (1995). Learning from TV programs: Application of TV presentation to a videoconferencing system.Proc. UIST’95, pp. 147–154.
Ishii, H., Kobayashi, M., & Arita, K. (1994). Iterative design of seamless collaboration media: From Team WorkStation to ClearBoard.Communications of the ACM, 37, 8, pp. 83–97.
Mantei, M., Baecker, R., Seilen, A., Buxton, W., Milligan, T., and Wellman, B. (1991). Experiences in the use of a media space.Proc. CHI ‘91, pp. 203–208.
Magee, B. R. (1992). Enhanced factory communications (video). In CSCW’92 Video Program, SIGGRAPH Video Review Issue 87.
Okada, K., Maeda, F., Ichikawaa, Y., & Matsushita, Y. (1994). Multiparty videoconferencing in virtual social distance: MAJIC design.Proc. CSCW’94, pp. 279–291.
Olson, M., & Bly, S. (1991). The Portland Experience: A report on a distributed research group. In S. Greenburg (Ed.),Computer supported cooperative work and groupware. London: Academic Press, pp. 81–98.
Olson, J.S., Olson, G. M.,Meader, D. K. (1995). What mix of audio and video is useful for doing remote real-time design work. Proc. CHI’95, pp. 362–368.
Root, R.W. (1988). Design of a multi-media vehicle for social browsing.Proc. CSCW’88, pp. 25–38.
Seilen, A. (1992). Speech patterns in video-mediated communication.Proc. CHI’92, pp. 49–59.
Tang, J.C., & Rua, M. (1994). Montage: Providing teleproximity for distributed groups.Proc. CHI’94, pp. 37–43.
Varonis, E.M., & Gass, S.M (1990). Miscommunication in non-native discourse. In N. Coupland, H. Giles, & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.),Miscommunication and Problematic Talk. SAGE publications.
Weeks, G.D., & Chapanis, A. (1976). Cooperative versus conflictive problem-solving in three telecommunication modes.Perceptual and Motor Skills,42, pp. 879–917.
Whittaker, S. (1995). Video as a technology for interpersonal communications: A new perspective.SPIE,2417, pp. 294–304.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, G. (1997). Task Conflict and Language Differences: Opportunities for Videoconferencing?. In: Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7372-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7372-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-7374-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7372-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive