Skip to main content

Abstract

Considerable research has found that adding audio to desktop conferencing improves problem-solving, but that there is no additional benefit from adding video. This paper describes an experiment that supports these earlier findings, while suggesting that video may provide significant benefit when used in tasks involving speakers with different priorities and different linguistic capabilities. The level of conflict in the experimental setting is consistent with that found in work settings, but is higher than that in most experimental situations. Tasks involving a mix of native and non-native English speakers are not universal but may be increasingly common. Thus, these findings provide encouragement to those working to improve videoconferencing technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Argyle, M. (1969).Social interaction. Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, W. (1992). Telepresence: Integrating Shared Task and Person Spaces. Reprinted in R. M. Baecker (Ed.),Readings in Groupware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993, pp. 816–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapanis, A., Ochsman, R., Parrish, R., & Weeks, G. (1972). Studies in interactive communication: I. The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problem solving.Human Factors,14, pp. 487–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerry, E. (1996). An empirical comparison of copresent and technologically-mediated interaction based on communicative breakdown. Doctoral dissertation. Available as CIS-TR-96–01, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P., & Bly, S. (1992). Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group.Proc. CHI’92, pp. 541–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egido, C. (1988). Videoconferencing as a technology to support group work: A review of its failure.Proc. CSCW’88, pp. 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., & Chalfonte, B. L. (1990). The Video Window System in informal communication.Proc. CSCW’90, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, Y., Okada, K., Jeong, G., Tanaka, S., & Matsushita, Y. (1995). MAJIC videoconferencing system: Experiments, evaluation and improvement.Proc. ECSCW ‘95, pp. 279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, T., Kobayashi, T., Okada, K., & Matsushita, Y. (1995). Learning from TV programs: Application of TV presentation to a videoconferencing system.Proc. UIST’95, pp. 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, H., Kobayashi, M., & Arita, K. (1994). Iterative design of seamless collaboration media: From Team WorkStation to ClearBoard.Communications of the ACM, 37, 8, pp. 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantei, M., Baecker, R., Seilen, A., Buxton, W., Milligan, T., and Wellman, B. (1991). Experiences in the use of a media space.Proc. CHI ‘91, pp. 203–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, B. R. (1992). Enhanced factory communications (video). In CSCW’92 Video Program, SIGGRAPH Video Review Issue 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada, K., Maeda, F., Ichikawaa, Y., & Matsushita, Y. (1994). Multiparty videoconferencing in virtual social distance: MAJIC design.Proc. CSCW’94, pp. 279–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M., & Bly, S. (1991). The Portland Experience: A report on a distributed research group. In S. Greenburg (Ed.),Computer supported cooperative work and groupware. London: Academic Press, pp. 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J.S., Olson, G. M.,Meader, D. K. (1995). What mix of audio and video is useful for doing remote real-time design work. Proc. CHI’95, pp. 362–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, R.W. (1988). Design of a multi-media vehicle for social browsing.Proc. CSCW’88, pp. 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilen, A. (1992). Speech patterns in video-mediated communication.Proc. CHI’92, pp. 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J.C., & Rua, M. (1994). Montage: Providing teleproximity for distributed groups.Proc. CHI’94, pp. 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varonis, E.M., & Gass, S.M (1990). Miscommunication in non-native discourse. In N. Coupland, H. Giles, & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.),Miscommunication and Problematic Talk. SAGE publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, G.D., & Chapanis, A. (1976). Cooperative versus conflictive problem-solving in three telecommunication modes.Perceptual and Motor Skills,42, pp. 879–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S. (1995). Video as a technology for interpersonal communications: A new perspective.SPIE,2417, pp. 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, G. (1997). Task Conflict and Language Differences: Opportunities for Videoconferencing?. In: Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7372-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7372-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-7374-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7372-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics