Abstract
Apart from the work of Talcott Parsons, there have been no major attempts systematically to link Freud’s theory with mainstream sociology. The work of the Frankfurt School is now coming into the mainstream of sociological theory, with the breakdown of positivistic schools of sociology. Critical theory is the only alternative base for sociological theory to that of positivism in all its varieties, apart from the phenomenological approaches which have recently emerged and been developed, for example, by Cicourel, Berger and Luckmann.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
See D. Cooper and R. Laing, Reason and Violence, London, 1964.
N. O. Brown, Life against Death, London, 1959; and Love’s Body, New York, 1966.
See also H. Marcuse, Negations, New York, 1968, Chapter VII, for a critical review of this latter book by Brown.
For continuities between Marx and Weber, see e.g. A. Giddens, Capitalism and Modern Social Theory, Cambridge, 1971.
E. Fromm, ‘The Method and Function of an Analytic Social Psychology’ (1932), reprinted in The Crisis of Psychoanalysis, Greenwich, Conn., 1970 (quotation from p. 144).
E. Fromm, ‘The Method and Function of an Analytic Social Psychology’ (1932), p. 139.
B. Malinowski, Sex and Repression in Savage Society, London, 1927.
See Fromm, The Crisis of Psychoanalysis, Chapters 6 and 7. Bachofen’s Mother Right was first published in 1861. It was one of the first books to discuss the newly discovered matricentric societies; mothers and women were more central to the social structure than in European society. There were different values in such cultures, especially towards nature and the earth; less intellectual and more earthy, which particularly attracted Fromm’s attention.
Fromm, The Crisis of Psychoanalysis, p. 134.
Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination, London, 1973, p. 101.
There is a German version of this paper in Sociologia II: Reden und Vortrage, edited by M. Horkheimer and T. Adorno, Frankfurt, 1962.
Jay, The Dialectical Imagination, p. 104.
Ibid.
Ibid., p. 105.
H. Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, New York, 1955, 1956; London, 1969 (references to the British edition).
E. Fromm, The Sane Society, New York, 1955.
E. Fromm, The Fear of Freedom, London, 1942.
Fromm, The Crisis of Psychoanalysis, p. 31.
Ibid., p. 36. (Also his books mentioned in n. 14 above.)
Ibid., p. 36.
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, p. 202.
S. Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents (1930), Standard Edition, Vol. 2 1. References to the revised edition, London, 1963, p. 71.
S. Freud, The Ego and the Id (1923), Standard Edition, Vol. 19. In this work ‘ego’ is not identified as consciousness; it is in part unconscious.
Fromm, The Crisis of Psychoanalysis, p. 37.
Ibid., p. 38.
See, e.g. E. Fromm, Marx’s Concept of Man, New York, 1961.
Fromm, The Crisis of Psychoanalysis, p. 40.
S. Freud, Five Lectures on Psychoanalysis (1909), Lecture IV, reprinted in Two Short Accounts of Psycho-analysis, Harmondsworth, 1962 (quotation from p. 69).
See Fromm, The Crisis of Psychoanalysis, p. 25. Fromm also makes the point that Marcuse does not stress full genital sexuality in the way Freud did, but rather non-reproductive sexuality. This is to miss the weight Freud gave to non-genital stage sexuality in the development of symptoms. Marcuse develops the aspect of Freud which thought that too much could not be expected of every person in the area of full genital sexuality and that more ‘perverse’ sex should be tolerated by some people (see Freud’s paper ‘Civilized Sexual Morality and Modern Nervousness)’.
See, e.g. J. Robinson, Christian Freedom in a Permissive Society, London, 1970.
And D. Mace, The Christian Response to the Sexual Revolution, London, 1971.
M. Schofield, The Sexual Behaviour of Young People, London, 1965.
See esp. Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents. And Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (1922), Standard Edition, Vol. 1 8. For a discussion of death instincts, see E. Fromm, The Heart of Man, New York, 1964; and The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness, London, 1974 (esp. the Appendix).
Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents, edition cit., p. 49.
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, p. 24.
E. Fromm, The Art of Loving, London, 1957, p. 94.
Reprinted as the Epilogue in Eros and Civilization.
Fromm, The Art of Loving, p. 65. Freud’s notion of aim-inhibited libido, called ‘affection’, can be found in Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, p. 71. 34. Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents, edition cit., p. 80.
See Freud, The Ego and the Id, edition cit., p. 43.
Fromm, The Crisis of Psychoanalysis, 1970, p. 25.
Freud, New Introductory Lectures, Lecture 35 (1933, first English translation, 1964). Reference to Penguin edition, Harmondsworth, 1973, p. 196.
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, p. 55.
See, for instance, MacIntyre’s criticism in Marcuse, London, 1970, Chapter 4. See also H. Marcuse’s essay, ‘Aggressiveness in Advanced Industrial Society’, first published in Negations, New York, 1968, which is more specific, being written during the Vietnam War.
Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents edition cit., p. 82.
S. Freud, Totem and Taboo (1913), Standard Edition, Vol. 13, Chapter 3 on ‘Animism, Magic and the Omnipotence of Thought’. Reference to Routledge & Kegan Paul edition, London, 1960, p. 85. (This is an important paper ignored by Marcuse!)
See, e.g. A. Maclntyre, The Unconscious, London, 1958, pp. 75–6.
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, pp. 80–81.
See D. Holbrook, Human Hope and the Death Instinct, Oxford, 1971.
Also W. Reich, The Sexual Revolution, 1929, 1935.
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, p. 126.
Ibid., p. 106.
Ibid., p. 40. See also D. de Rougement, Passion and Society, London, 1956. A brilliant analysis of Tristan and Isolde myth.
Freud, Civilization and its Discontents, edition cit., p. 82. See also Freud, Beyond the Pleasure Principle, edition cit., p. 93.
See Freud, The Future of an Illusion, edition cit., 1927, p. 14:(‘The gods retain their threefold task: they must exorcize the terrors of nature, they must reconcile men to the cruelty of fate, particularly as is shown in death...’).
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, p. 97.
For this reason Freud is in part a conservative thinker in political matters.
Freud, ‘Formulations Regarding the two principles in Mental Functioning’ (1911), available in P. Rieff (ed.), General Psychological Theory, New York, 1963.
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, p. 31. And Fromm, The Crisis of Psychoanalysis, p. 27.
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, pp. 32–3. Quotation from Freud, A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis, New York, 1935 and 1943: p. 273. (Entitled Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis, London, 1929.)
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, p. 46.
Ibid., p. 50.
Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents, edition cit., pp. 60–61.
Ibid., p. 66. Marcuse quotes a different translation of the same passage in Eros and Civilization, p. 75. The English version is used here from the Hogarth Press edition.
Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents, edition cit., p. 69.
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, pp. 113–14.
Ibid., p. 118.
Ibid., pp. 79–80.
See Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents, edition cit., pp. 47–9.
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, p. 118.
Ibid., pp. 86–7. See also his lecture on ‘The Obsolescence of the Freudian Conception of Man’ (1963), to be found in English in H. Marcuse, Five Lectures, Boston, Mass., 1970.
See ibid., p. 49. See also Eros and Civilization, p. 91.
P. Berger, ‘Towards a Sociological Understanding of Psychoanalysis’, in Social Research, 1965, pp. 26–41.
For distinction between other-directed and inner-directed, see D. Reisman, The Lonely Crowd, London, 1950.
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, p. 89.
Ibid., p. 85.
Marcuse, ‘The Obsolescence of the Freudian Conception of Man’, in Five Lectures, p. 57.
Ibid., p. 50.
Ibid., p. 51.
Freud, Formulations Regarding the Two Principles in Mental Functioning (1911), reference to Collier Books edition, New York, 1963, p. 26.
Ibid., p. 24.
Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents, p. 52.
Ibid., p. 52.
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, p. 151.
Ibid., p. 147.
Ibid., p. 70.
Ibid., p. 68.
Ibid., p. 162.
Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents, edition cit., p. 69.
Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, p. 137.
Ibid.
Ibid. (quoting Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents).
Ibid., p. 138.
Ibid.
Ibid., p. 168.
Ibid., p. 172.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bocock, R. (1976). Freud and Recent Sociological Theory: the Frankfurt School. In: Freud and Modern Society. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7364-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7364-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-412-38450-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7364-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive