Skip to main content

Implications of Process-Morphology for Categorial Grammar

  • Chapter
Book cover Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 32))

Abstract

Language can be approached from many points of view. Indeed, its very vastness prevents one from seeing all of it from a single perspective. It is for this reason that the logician H. B. Curry, in his intriguing, though somewhat neglected article ‘Some Logical Aspects of Grammatical Structure’, compares the study of language with the case of the six blind men and the elephant. According to the story, each blind man touched a different part of the animal, and the one who had it by the tail thought it was like a rope and the one who touched a leg claimed it was like a pillar, and so on. In the study of language, however, it sometimes seems as if the blind men are not really blind: they merely close their eyes to the reality of the elephant. A case in point is the study of morphology, where, after a period of relative neglect, there is now a vigorous ongoing debate about the properties that a restrictive general theory of word-formation and inflection should have. In this paper, we take the position that some recent proposals are restrictive only because they ignore many of the readily available data. This includes most varieties of categorial grammar, insofar as they deal with morphology at all. The main goal of this paper is to propose an extension of categorial grammar in order to enable it to deal with the complexities found in the morphological systems of natural languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Ades, A. E. and M. Steedman: 1982, ‘On the Order of Words’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 517–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R.: 1972, ‘On Nazalization in Sundanese’, Linguistic Inquiry 3, 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R.: 1974, The Organization of Phonology, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R.: 1975, ‘On the Interaction of Phonological Rules of Various Types’, Journal of Linguistics 11, 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R.: 1977, ‘On the Formal Description of Inflection’, in W. A. Beach, S. E. Fox, and S. Philosoph (eds.), Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 15–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R.: 1982, ‘Where’s Morphology?’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 571–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R.: 1984, ‘Rules as “Morphemes” in a Theory of Inflection’, in D. S. Rood (ed.), 1983 Mid-America Conference Papers, Dept. of Linguistics, University of Colorado, Boulder, pp. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, M.: 1976, Word Formation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E.: 1975, ‘Order in Base Structures’, in C. Li (ed.), Word Order and Word Order Change, University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 307–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E.: 1979, ‘Control in Montague Grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 10, 515–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E.: 1983, ‘On the Relationship between Word-Grammar and Phrase-Grammar’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 65–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E.: 1984, ‘Some Generalizations of Categorial Grammars’, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, Y.: 1964, Language and Information, Addison-Wesley, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benthem, J. F. A. K. van: 1984, The Logic of Semantics’, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp. 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benthem, J. F. A. K. van: this volume, ‘The Lambek Calculus’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besnier, N.: 1983, ‘An Autosegmental Approach to Metathesis in Rotuman’, unpublished paper, USC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L.: 1933, Language, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J., R. Kaplan, S. Peters, and A. Zaenen: 1982, ‘Cross-Serial Dependencies in Dutch’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 613–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broselow, E. and J. J. McCarthy: 1983/1984, ‘A Theory of Internal Reduplication’, The Linguistic Review 3, 25–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, C.: 1976, ‘Universal Properties of Umlaut and Vowel Coalescence Rules: Implications for Rotuman Phonology’, in A. Juilland (ed.), Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday. Second Volume: Phonology. Anma Libri, Saratoga, California, pp. 271–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1956, ‘Three Models for the Description of Language’, in I.R.E. Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. IT-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchward, C. M.: 1940, Rotuman Grammar and Dictionary, Australasian Medical Publishing Company Limited, for the Methodist Church of Australasia, Dept. of Overseas Missions, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, H. B.: 1961, ‘Some Logical Aspects of Grammatical Structure’, in R. Jakobson (ed.), Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects. Proceedings of the Twelfth Symposium on Applied Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., pp. 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S.: 1985, ‘Internal Reduplication and Template-Driven Association’, unpublished paper, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. M. W.: 1972, The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D. R.: 1978, ‘Applying Montague’s Views on Linguistic Metatheory to the Structure of the Lexicon’, in D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen, and K. W. Todrys (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 97–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D. R.: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and Montague’s PTQ, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, W. U.: 1985, ‘On the Predictiveness of Natural Morphology’, Journal of Linguistics 21, 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudas, K.: 1974, ‘A Case of Functional Opacity: Javanese Elative Formation’, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 4, 91–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudas, K.: 1976, The Phonology and Morphology of Modern Javanese, doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanselow, G.: 1981, Zur Syntax und Semantik der Nominalkomposition, Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G. and G. K. Pullum: 1981, Subcategorization, Constituent Order and the Notion “Head”’, in M. Moortgat, H. van der Hulst, and T. Hoekstra (eds.), The Scope of Lexical Rules, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeringen, C. B. van: 1947, De Meervoudsvorming in het Nederlands’, Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen, afd. Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks, Deel 10, No. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankamer, J.: 1973, ‘Syllable Counting Rules’, paper presented at the LSA Annual Meeting, San Diego, Dec. 28–30, 1973. (Abstract published in Meeting Handbook, pp. 51–52.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Z.: 1951, Structural Linguistics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockett, Ch. F.: 1954, ‘Two Models of Grammatical Description’, Word 10, 210–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J.: 1980, ‘Verbale Verstrengeling Ontstrengeld’, Spektator 10, 221–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J.: 1984, Categorial Morphology, doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, published by Garland Press, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulst, H. van der: 1983, ‘Metathesis within the CV-Model’, unpublished paper, INL, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, R. D.: 1980, ‘On a Certain Construction of English’s’, in B. R. Caron et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, pp. 324–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, R. D.: 1981, ‘A Case of Liberation from Morphology into Syntax: The Fate of the English Genitive-Marker -(e)s’, in B. Johns and D. Strong (eds.), Syntactic Change, pp. 59–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, R. D.: 1982a, ‘On Limiting the Form of Morphological Rules: German Umlaut, Diacritic Features, and the “Cluster-Constraint”’, in J. Pustejovsky and P. Sells (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 12, 1982, GLSA, UMass/Amherst, Amherst, MA, pp. 140–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, R. D.: 1982b, ‘Of Formal Identity and Rule-(Un)Collapsibility: On Lost and Found Generalizations in Morphology’, in D. P. Flickinger, M. Macken, and N. Wiegand (eds.), Proceedings of the First West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Linguistics Dept., Stanford University, Stanford, California, pp. 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, R. D.: 1982c, ‘High German Umlaut and Morphologization’, unpublished paper, University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, R. D.: 1983a, ‘Two Umlaut-Heresies and Their Claim to Orthodoxy’, in E. Martin-Callejo-Manandise (ed.), Exploring Language: Linguistic Heresies from the Desert, Coyote Papers: Working Papers in Linguistics from A Z4, pp. 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, R. D.: 1983b, “‘Morphemes” Aren’t Something That Grows on Trees: Morphology as More the Phonology Than the Syntax of Words’, in J. F. Richardson, M. Marks, and A. Chukerman (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 7995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, R. D.: 1984, ‘Why Morphological Metathesis Rules are Rare: On the Possibility of Historical Explanation in Linguistics’, in C. Brugman and M. Macaulay (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, R. D.: 1985, ‘An Autosegmental-Morphological Solution to the Problem of Phonesthemes and Blends’, paper presented at the 11th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 16–18, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, R. D.: 1987, On the Motivation for an Evolutionary Typology of Sound-Structural Rules,doctoral dissertation, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, R. D. and B. D. Joseph: 1986, “One Rule or Many? Sanskrit Reduplication as Fragmented Affixation”, in B. D. Joseph, ed., Studies on Language Change, OSUWPL 34, 84–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.: 1980, Nakanai of New Britain: The Grammar of an Oceanic Language. The Australian National University, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, B. D. and R. D. Janda: 1986, ‘E pluribus unum: The Rule-Constellation as an Expression of Formal Unity Amidst Morphological Fragmentation’, paper presented at the Fifteenth Annual Linguistic Symposium, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee ( Milwaukee Morphology Meeting ), April 4–6, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaisse, E.: 1982, ‘Sentential Clitics and Wackernagel’s Law’, in D. P. Flickinger, M. Macken, and N. Wiegand (eds.), Proceedings of the First West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Linguistics Dept., Stanford University, Stanford, California, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaisse, E.: 1985, Connected Speech, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, T.: 1971, Tzeltal Phonology and Morphology, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. L.: 1979, ‘On Surface Form and Logical Form’, L.A.U.T. paper 63, Series A. University of Trier, Trier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P.: 1982, ‘Lexical Phonology and Morphology’, in Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Hanshin, Seoul, pp. 3–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klavans, J.: 1980, Topics in a Theory of Clitics, doctoral dissertation, University College London; distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J.: 1958, ‘The Mathematics of Sentence Structure’, American Mathematical Monthly 56, 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J.: 1961, ‘The Calculus of Syntactic Types’, in R. Jakobson (ed.), Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects. Proceedings of the Twelfth Symposium on Applied Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R. I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessen Kloeke, W. U. S. van: `Truncation in German — Morphotactic versus Phono-tactic Constraints’, in H. Bennis and F. Beukema (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1985, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp. 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1972, ‘General Semantics’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 169–218.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R.: 1980, On the Organization of the Lexicon, doctoral dissertation, MIT; distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, A.: 1982, ‘Re Reduplication’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 435–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P. H.: 1965, ‘The Inflectional Component of a Word-and-Paradigm Grammar’, Journal of Linguistics 1, 139–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P. H.: 1972, Inflectional Morphology. A Theoretical Study Based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J.: 1979, Formal Issues in Semitic Phonology and Morphology,doctoral

    Google Scholar 

  • dissertation, MIT; distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1982. McCarthy, J. J.: 1981, ‘A Prosodic Theory of Nonconcatenative Morphology’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 373–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J.: 1982, ‘Prosodic Structure and Expletive Infixation’, Language 58, 574–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J.: 1984, ‘Morphological Structure(s)’, unpublished paper, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J.: 1986, ‘OCP Effects: Gemination and Antigemination’, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 207–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1974 (edited by R. Thomason), Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, M.: 1983, ‘Synthetic Compounds and Interpretation’, unpublished paper, INL, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, M.: 1984, ‘Compositionality and the Syntax of Words’, paper presented at the 5th Amsterdam Colloquium, August 29, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, E. A.: 1977, ‘On Rules of Infixing’, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, E. A.: 1978, ‘Reduplicative Constructions’, in J. H. Greenberg, C. Ferguson, and E. A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, Volume 3, Word Structure, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mors, C. ter: 1984, ‘Affix to X: Broselow and McCarthy vs Marantz: A Reinterpretation’, The Linguistic Review 3, 275–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebel, A.: 1948, Dinka Grammar (Rek-Malual Dialect), with Texts and Vocabulary, Missioni Africane, Verona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevis, J.: 1985, Finnish Particle Clitics and General Clitic Theory,unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S. S.: 1944, Yokuts Language of California, Viking Fund, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C.: 1984, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammars, Head Grammars and Natural Language,doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullum, G. K. and A. M. Zwicky: n.d., The Phonology-Syntax Interface,unpublished bookdraft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. H.: 1958, The Yurok Language of Northern California, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, M.: 1981, ‘A Preliminary Account of the Rotuman Vowel System’, unpublished paper, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E.: 1921, Language, Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmerling, S. F.: 1982, ‘The Proper Treatment of the Relationship Between Syntax and Phonology’, Texas Linguistic Forum 19, 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmerling, S. F.: 1983a, ‘Two Theories of Syntactic Categories’, Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 393–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmerling, S. F.: 1983b, ‘Montague Morphophonemics’, in J. F. Richardson, M. Marks, and A. Chukerman (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 222–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. 0.: 1982, The Syntax of Words, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieber, S.: 1985, ‘Evidence Against the Context-Freeness of Natural Language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D.: 1974, Topics in English Morphology, doctoral dissertation, MIT; published by Garland Press, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. S. H.: 1985, ‘Spreading, Reduplication and the Default Option in Miwok Nonconcatenative Morphology’, in H. van der Hu1st and N. S. H. Smith (eds.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Advances in Nonlinear Phonology: Results of the Amsterdam Workshop on Nonlinear Phonology,Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp. 363–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. S. H. and B. Hermans: 1982, Nonconcatenatieve woordvorming in het Sierra Miwok’, GLOT 5, 263–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, M. J.: 1985, ‘Dependency and Coordination in the Grammar of Dutch and English’, Language 61, 523–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, S. et al.: 1981, An Encyclopedia of AUX: A Study in Crosslinguistic Equivalence,MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steriade, D.: 1986, ‘Yokuts and the Vowel Plane’, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A. M.: 1977, ‘On Local Ordering in Sundanese’, Linguistic Inquiry 8, 155162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, S. L.: 1982, Lexicalist Phonology of English and German, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, D. M.: 1973, Chamorro Reference Grammar, The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ultan, R.: 1975, ‘Infixes and Their Origin’, in H. Seiler (ed.), Linguistic Workshop III, Fink, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennemann, T. and R. T. Harlow: 1977, ‘Categorial Grammar and Consistent VX Serialization’, Theoretical Linguistics 4, 227–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, J.-R.: 1977, ‘Formal Properties of Phonological Rules’, in R. E. Butts and J. Hintikka (eds.), Basic Problems in Methodology and Linguistics, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp. 299–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, J.: 1892, ‘Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung’, Indogermanische Forschungen 1, 333–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C. D.: 1970, ‘Diegueüo Plural Formation’, Linguistic Notes From La Jolla 4, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, R. S.: 1947, ‘Immediate Constituents’, Language 23, 81–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1981, ‘On the Notions “Lexically Related” and “Head of a Word”’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, A. M.: 1984, ‘Heads’, Journal of Linguistics 21, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, A. M.: 1985, ‘How To Describe Inflection’, in M. Niepokuj, M. van Clay, V. Nikiforidou, and D. Feder (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, pp. 372–386.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoeksema, J., Janda, R.D. (1988). Implications of Process-Morphology for Categorial Grammar. In: Oehrle, R.T., Bach, E., Wheeler, D. (eds) Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6878-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6878-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-031-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-6878-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics