Skip to main content

Categorial Grammar and Phrase Structure Grammar: An Excursion on the Syntax-Semantics Frontier

  • Chapter
Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 32))

Abstract

The notion of a phrase structure grammar first came to the attention of the linguistic community with the publication in 1957 of Syntactic Structures, wherein Noam Chomsky asserted that phrase structure grammars were inadequate for linguistic description. He went on to argue for a model of linguistic structure in which the constituent structure trees produced by a phrase structure grammar were subsequently subjected to operations called transformations that added, deleted, or moved constituents. Successive versions of Chomsky’s transformational grammar came to be accepted as the standard framework for syntactic theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ades, Anthony E. and Mark J. Steedman: 1982, ‘On the Order of Words’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 517–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz: 1935, Die syntaktische Konnexität’, Studia Philosophica 1, 1–27. English translation in: Storrs McCall (ed.), Polish Logic 1920–1939, Oxford University Press, pp. 207–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon: 1980, ‘In Defense of Passive’, Linguistics and Philosophy 3 297–341. Bach, Emmon: 1983, ‘Generalized Categorial Grammars and the English Auxiliary’, in

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank Heny and Barry Richards (eds.), Linguistic Categories,Vol. 2, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua: 1953, ‘A Quasi-Arithmetic Notation for Syntactic Description’, Language 29, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua (ed.): 1964, Language and Information, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan W.: 1982, The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam A.: 1957, Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1982, ‘Grammatical Rel, tions and Montague Grammar’, in P. Jacobson and G. K. Pullum (eds.), pp. 79–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: this volume, ‘Type Raising, Functional Composition, and Non-Constituent Conjunction’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald: 1979a, ‘Constituent Structures’, unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald: 1979b, ‘English as a Context-Free Language’, unpublished manuscript. Gazdar, Gerald: 1981, ‘Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 155–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald: 1982, ‘Phrase Structure Grammar’, in P. Jacobson and G. Pullum (eds.), pp. 131–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey K. Pullum, and Ivan A. Sag: 1985, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Blackwell’s, Oxford, and Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald and Geoffrey K. Pullum: 1981, ‘Subcategorization, Constituent Order, and the Notion “Head”’, in M. Moortgat, H. van der Hulst, and T. Hoekstra (eds.), The Scope of Lexical Rules, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline and Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.): 1982, The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Martin: 1979, ‘Functional Grammar’, in C. Chiarello et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley, pp. 142–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Martin: 1983, Unification Grammar, Technical Report, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl: 1984, ‘Head Grammars, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammars, and

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Language’, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl: 1985, ‘Phrase Structure Grammar without Metarules’, in Proceedings of the Fourth Annual West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford Univer-sity Linguistics Department, Stanford, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl and Ivan A. Sag: in press, Information-Based Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 1: Fundamental Notions,CSLI Lecture Notes Series, distributed by University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Gerald Gazdar: 1982, ‘Natural Languages and Context-Free Languages’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 471–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sag, Ivan A.: 1987, ‘Grammatical Hierarchy and Linear Precedence’, Geoffrey Huck and Almerindo Ojeda (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 20: Discontinuous Constituency. Also appeared as CSLI Report No. CSLI-86–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieber, Stuart: 1986, An Introduction to Unification-based Grammar Formalisms,CSLI Lecture Notes Series, distributed by University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieber, Stuart et al.: 1984, ‘The Formalism and Implementation of PATR-II’, in Research on Interactive Acquisition and Use of Knowledge,SRI International, Meno Park, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark: 1983, ‘On the Generality of the Nested Dependency Constraint and the Reason for an Exception in Dutch’, Brian Butterworth et al. (eds.), Explanations of Language Universals (Linguistics, n.s., 21, p. 1), pp. 35–66. Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark: 1985a, ‘Dependency and Coordination in the Grammar of Dutch and English’, Language 61, 523–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark: 1985b, ‘Combinatory, Categorial Grammars, and Parasitic Gaps’, unpublished manuscript, School of Epistemics and Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, Mark: this voume, ‘Combinators and Categorial Grammars’

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, Anna: 1983, ‘ECP in Categorial Grammar’, unpublished manuscript, Max Planck Institute, Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pollard, C.J. (1988). Categorial Grammar and Phrase Structure Grammar: An Excursion on the Syntax-Semantics Frontier. In: Oehrle, R.T., Bach, E., Wheeler, D. (eds) Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6878-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6878-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-031-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-6878-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics