Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 32))

Abstract

Consider a directional categorial grammar with the rule of functional application A and, in addition, the two type-shifting rules below, lifting L and division D. For obvious reasons I will call this system L after Lambek’s (1958) syntactic calculus, where these reduction rules have the status of theorems. I single out lifting and division among the theorems of Lambek’s calculus because of their prominent role in linguistic discussion. As will appear from the format, fractional categories are projected from the vertical into the horizontal mode by giving them a quarter turn clockwise. This gives the fractional categories a domain-range structure, which makes it easy to think of them either as syntactic or semantic types: X | Y is a functor which combines syntactically with an expression of type X to give an expression of type Y; semantically it is interpreted as a function f: type (X) → type(Y). (In what follows, I shall refer to the type of a syntactic or semantic object X as ‘t(X)’.) Directionality is encoded in the form of the fraction sign, back-slash standing for left-concatenation, slash for right-concatenation. The vertical slant is used to conflate the modes of concatenation, so that for example one interpretation schema can serve for a pair of directional reduction rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aronoff, M.: 1976, Word Formation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E.: 1983a, ‘On the Relationship Between Word Grammar and Phrase Grammar’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 65–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E.: 1983b, ‘Generalized Categorial Grammars and the English Auxiliary’, in Heny and Richards (eds.), Linguistic Categories, Vol. 2, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 101–120.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E.: 1984, ‘Some Generalizations of Categorial Grammars’, in Landman and Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benthem, J. van: 1984, ‘The Logic of Semantics’, in Landman and Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benthem, J. van: 1985, ‘The Lambek Calculus’, in this volume, pp. 000–000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J., R. M. Kaplan, S. Peters, and A. Zaenen: 1982, ‘Cross-serial Dependencies in Dutch’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 613–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremers, C.: 1985, ‘Een Arme Categorieënrekening voor het Nederlands’, Paper presented at the 1985 TIN Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D.: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar,Reidel, Dordrecht. Fabb, N.: 1984, Syntactic Affixation,MIT Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, M.: 1983, ‘A Categorial Theory of Structure Building’, in Gazdar, Klein and Pullum (eds.), Order, Concord and Constituency, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 139–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G.: 1980, ‘A Cross-categorial Semantics for Coordination’, Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 407–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G. and G. Pullum: 1981, ‘Subcategorization, Constituent Order, and the Notion “head”’, in Moortgat, van der Hulst and Hoekstra (eds.), The Scope of Lexical Rules. Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. Pullum, and I. Sag: 1985, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P.: 1972, ‘A Program for Syntax’, in Davidson and Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 483–497.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach Royen, P.: 1943, Aanschouwelijkheidsdrang bij Voorzetsels’, Nieuwe Taalgids 37, 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J.: 1983, ‘Wanna Do Contraction?’ GLOT 6, 157–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J.: 1984, Categorial Morphology. Groningen Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtman, J.: 1984, ‘Een Kategoriale Beschrijving van het Nederlands’, Tabu 14, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. and L. Faltz: 1985, Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E. and I. Sag: 1985, ‘Type Driven Translation’, Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 163–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, J.: 1958, ‘The Mathematics of Sentence Structure’, Am. Math. Monthly 65, 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marie, J. van: 1978, ‘Veranderingen in Woordstructuur’, in Koefoed and van Marie (eds.), Aspecten van Taalverandering, Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, pp. 127–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marle, J. van: 1984, ‘Morfologische Veranderingen in Breder Perspectief’, in Vorm en Functie in Tekst en Taal, Leiden, pp. 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, M.: 1984, ‘A Fregean Restriction on Metarules’, in Jones and Sells (eds.), NELS 14, Amherst, pp. 306–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, M.: (1987), ‘Compositionality and the Syntax of Words’, in Groenendijk, de Jongh and Stokhof (eds.), Foundations of Pragmatics and Lexical Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, M.: 1985a, ‘Complementovererving en Heranalyse in de Morfologie’, Paper presented at the 1985 TIN Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, M.: 1985b, ‘Functional Composition and Complement Inheritance’, in Hoppenbrouwers, Seuren, and Weijters (eds.), Meaning and the Lexicon, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. and M. Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in Bäuerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 361–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: 1984, ‘Compositionality’, in Landman and Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, H.: 1920, Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, Niemeyer, Halle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, D.: 1985, ‘Morphology and Logical Form’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 193–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C.: 1984, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammars, Head Grammars, and Natural Language,Stanford Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, A.: 1979, ‘Het Suffix -se: Een Geval van Morfologische Herstructurering (Metanalyse)’, Tabu 9, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, A.: 1980, ‘Kwesties van Morfologie’, in Janssen en Streekstra (eds.), Grenzen en Domeinen in de Grammatica van het Nederlands, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, A.: 1981, Morfologische Herstructurering (Metanalyse)’, in G. R. W. Dibbets e.a. (eds.), Studies voor Damsteegt, Leiden, pp. 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmerling, S.: 1983, ‘A New Theory of English Auxiliaries’, in Heny and Richards (eds.), Linguistic Categories, Vol. Two, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultink, H.: 1979, ‘Combinatie van Affixen Binnen Woorden, in het bijzonder in het Nederlands’, in Hoekstra and van der Hulst (eds.), Morfologie in Nederland, Leiden, pp. 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, L.: 1982, The Syntax of Words,MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, M.: 1984, ‘A Categorial Theory of Intersecting Dependencies in Dutch Infinitival Complements’, in De Geest and Putseys (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Complementation, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, M.: 1985, ‘Dependency and Coordination in the Grammar of Dutch and English’, Language 61, 523–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, M. and A. Szabolcsi: 1985, ‘Combinatory, Categorial Grammars and Parasitic Gaps’, draft 5, ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1981, ‘On the Notions “Lexically Related” and “Head of a Word”’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts, F.: 1986, Categoriale Grammatica en Algebraische Semantiek,Groningen Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moortgat, M. (1988). Mixed Composition and Discontinuous Dependencies. In: Oehrle, R.T., Bach, E., Wheeler, D. (eds) Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6878-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6878-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-031-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-6878-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics