Abstract
Consider a directional categorial grammar with the rule of functional application A and, in addition, the two type-shifting rules below, lifting L and division D. For obvious reasons I will call this system L after Lambek’s (1958) syntactic calculus, where these reduction rules have the status of theorems. I single out lifting and division among the theorems of Lambek’s calculus because of their prominent role in linguistic discussion. As will appear from the format, fractional categories are projected from the vertical into the horizontal mode by giving them a quarter turn clockwise. This gives the fractional categories a domain-range structure, which makes it easy to think of them either as syntactic or semantic types: X | Y is a functor which combines syntactically with an expression of type X to give an expression of type Y; semantically it is interpreted as a function f: type (X) → type(Y). (In what follows, I shall refer to the type of a syntactic or semantic object X as ‘t(X)’.) Directionality is encoded in the form of the fraction sign, back-slash standing for left-concatenation, slash for right-concatenation. The vertical slant is used to conflate the modes of concatenation, so that for example one interpretation schema can serve for a pair of directional reduction rules.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aronoff, M.: 1976, Word Formation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Bach, E.: 1983a, ‘On the Relationship Between Word Grammar and Phrase Grammar’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 65–89.
Bach, E.: 1983b, ‘Generalized Categorial Grammars and the English Auxiliary’, in Heny and Richards (eds.), Linguistic Categories, Vol. 2, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 101–120.
Bach, E.: 1984, ‘Some Generalizations of Categorial Grammars’, in Landman and Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 1–23.
Benthem, J. van: 1984, ‘The Logic of Semantics’, in Landman and Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 55–80.
Benthem, J. van: 1985, ‘The Lambek Calculus’, in this volume, pp. 000–000.
Bresnan, J., R. M. Kaplan, S. Peters, and A. Zaenen: 1982, ‘Cross-serial Dependencies in Dutch’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 613–635.
Cremers, C.: 1985, ‘Een Arme Categorieënrekening voor het Nederlands’, Paper presented at the 1985 TIN Meeting.
Dowty, D.: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar,Reidel, Dordrecht. Fabb, N.: 1984, Syntactic Affixation,MIT Dissertation.
Flynn, M.: 1983, ‘A Categorial Theory of Structure Building’, in Gazdar, Klein and Pullum (eds.), Order, Concord and Constituency, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 139–174.
Gazdar, G.: 1980, ‘A Cross-categorial Semantics for Coordination’, Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 407–409.
Gazdar, G. and G. Pullum: 1981, ‘Subcategorization, Constituent Order, and the Notion “head”’, in Moortgat, van der Hulst and Hoekstra (eds.), The Scope of Lexical Rules. Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 107–123.
Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. Pullum, and I. Sag: 1985, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Blackwell, Oxford.
Geach, P.: 1972, ‘A Program for Syntax’, in Davidson and Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 483–497.
Gerlach Royen, P.: 1943, Aanschouwelijkheidsdrang bij Voorzetsels’, Nieuwe Taalgids 37, 87–93.
Hoeksema, J.: 1983, ‘Wanna Do Contraction?’ GLOT 6, 157–182.
Hoeksema, J.: 1984, Categorial Morphology. Groningen Dissertation.
Houtman, J.: 1984, ‘Een Kategoriale Beschrijving van het Nederlands’, Tabu 14, 1–27.
Keenan, E. and L. Faltz: 1985, Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Klein, E. and I. Sag: 1985, ‘Type Driven Translation’, Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 163–202.
Lambek, J.: 1958, ‘The Mathematics of Sentence Structure’, Am. Math. Monthly 65, 154–169.
Marie, J. van: 1978, ‘Veranderingen in Woordstructuur’, in Koefoed and van Marie (eds.), Aspecten van Taalverandering, Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, pp. 127–176.
Marle, J. van: 1984, ‘Morfologische Veranderingen in Breder Perspectief’, in Vorm en Functie in Tekst en Taal, Leiden, pp. 131–153.
Moortgat, M.: 1984, ‘A Fregean Restriction on Metarules’, in Jones and Sells (eds.), NELS 14, Amherst, pp. 306–325.
Moortgat, M.: (1987), ‘Compositionality and the Syntax of Words’, in Groenendijk, de Jongh and Stokhof (eds.), Foundations of Pragmatics and Lexical Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht.
Moortgat, M.: 1985a, ‘Complementovererving en Heranalyse in de Morfologie’, Paper presented at the 1985 TIN Meeting.
Moortgat, M.: 1985b, ‘Functional Composition and Complement Inheritance’, in Hoppenbrouwers, Seuren, and Weijters (eds.), Meaning and the Lexicon, Foris, Dordrecht.
Partee, B. and M. Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in Bäuerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 361–383.
Partee, B.: 1984, ‘Compositionality’, in Landman and Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht.
Paul, H.: 1920, Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, Niemeyer, Halle.
Pesetsky, D.: 1985, ‘Morphology and Logical Form’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 193–246.
Pollard, C.: 1984, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammars, Head Grammars, and Natural Language,Stanford Dissertation.
Sassen, A.: 1979, ‘Het Suffix -se: Een Geval van Morfologische Herstructurering (Metanalyse)’, Tabu 9, 31–39.
Sassen, A.: 1980, ‘Kwesties van Morfologie’, in Janssen en Streekstra (eds.), Grenzen en Domeinen in de Grammatica van het Nederlands, Groningen.
Sassen, A.: 1981, Morfologische Herstructurering (Metanalyse)’, in G. R. W. Dibbets e.a. (eds.), Studies voor Damsteegt, Leiden, pp. 171–183.
Schmerling, S.: 1983, ‘A New Theory of English Auxiliaries’, in Heny and Richards (eds.), Linguistic Categories, Vol. Two, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–53.
Schultink, H.: 1979, ‘Combinatie van Affixen Binnen Woorden, in het bijzonder in het Nederlands’, in Hoekstra and van der Hulst (eds.), Morfologie in Nederland, Leiden, pp. 105–116.
Selkirk, L.: 1982, The Syntax of Words,MIT Press.
Steedman, M.: 1984, ‘A Categorial Theory of Intersecting Dependencies in Dutch Infinitival Complements’, in De Geest and Putseys (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Complementation, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 215–226.
Steedman, M.: 1985, ‘Dependency and Coordination in the Grammar of Dutch and English’, Language 61, 523–568.
Steedman, M. and A. Szabolcsi: 1985, ‘Combinatory, Categorial Grammars and Parasitic Gaps’, draft 5, ms.
Williams, E.: 1981, ‘On the Notions “Lexically Related” and “Head of a Word”’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 245–274.
Zwarts, F.: 1986, Categoriale Grammatica en Algebraische Semantiek,Groningen Dissertation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moortgat, M. (1988). Mixed Composition and Discontinuous Dependencies. In: Oehrle, R.T., Bach, E., Wheeler, D. (eds) Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6878-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6878-4_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-031-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-6878-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive