Abstract
The principal concern of this chapter is to examine and study movements over time in labor supply. Traditional theories have sought to study the size of labor force primarily in terms of trade-offs between work and leisure; and empirical investigations have relied almost exclusively on data from cross-section evidence to test these theories.1 The use of cross-section evidence allows for certain noneconomic factors — such as household composition — to be incorporated into the analysis, and avoids the task of modeling secular trends that influence labor supply. Thus the analysis is focused exclusively on the economics of labor supply, through the incentive to work (wages, taxation, and unemployment benefits) and through the utilization of labor (hours supplied). The main drawback of such an approach is that its findings cannot be translated easily into a time series hypothesis because it provides no understanding of the nature of secular changes in the labor supply. The heavy reliance on cross-section evidence is due in part to the fact that the data required are more readily available. The usual sources of data are censuses or surveys of households, which provide response to questions such as “did you work, or seek work, in a particular period” and thus are regarded as providing the most complete and appropriate information. Time series data are a available in the U.K. (and other countries) but the estimates are derived from statistics collected for administrative purposes and tend to be more limited in scope than censuses and surveys. Thus when undertaking time series analysis one is usually required to have some explanation of how and why administrative estimates may differ from the “true” levels.2 Explicit modeling of such measurement problems becomes a major part of the analysis and draws attention to fundamental weaknesses in our understanding of the supply of labor. Above, we lack an adequately precise concept of labor supply: even answers to survey questions such as the one above provide measures that can be shown to be conceptually weak. A major part of this chapter is therefore concerned with understanding the quality of the data and an appropriate concept of labor supply.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alden, J., and Spooner, R. [1982], Multiple Job Holders—an Analysis of Second Jobs in the European Community, Luxembourg: Eurostat, Statistical Office of The European Communities.
Bowers, J. K. [1975], “British Activity Rates: a Survey of Research,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 22, 57–90.
Central Statistical Offiice [1983a], Annual Abstract of Statistics, 1983 Edition, London: HMSO.
Central Statistical Offiice [1983b], Social Trends No. 13, London: HMSO.
Chow, G. [1960], “Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coeffiicients in Two Linear Regressions”, Econometrica, 28, 591–605.
Craig, C., Rubery, J., Tarling, R., and Wilkinson, F. [1982], Labour Market Structure, Industrial Organisation and Low Pay, Department of Applied Economics, occasional paper 54, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cubbin, J. S., and Foley, K. [1977], “The Extent of Benefit-Induced Unemployment in Great Britain: Some New Evidence”, Oxford Economic Papers, 29, 128–140.
Department of Employment [1971], British Labour Statistics: Historical Abstract1886–1968, London: HMSO.
Department of Employment [1973a], “New Series of Annual Employment Statistics,” Gazette, January, 5–7, London: HMSO.
Department of Employment [1973b], “Annual censuses of employment: results for 1971 and 1972,” Gazette, August, 739–749, London: HMSO.
Department of Employment [1974], “Labour Force Projections 1973–1991,” Gazette, April, 304–310, London: HMSO.
Fisher, M. R. [1971], The Economics of Labor, London: Wiedenfeld and Nicolson.
Godley, W. A. H., and Shepherd, J. [1964], “Long-Term Growth and Short-Term Policy,” National Institute Economic Review, August, 26–38.
Greenhalgh, C. [1977], “A Labour Supply Function for Married Women in Great Britain,” Economica, 44, 249–265.
H.M.S.O. [1972], Unemployment Statistics: a Report of an Inter-Departmental Working Party Comnd. 5157, London: HMSO.
Holt, C. C. [1970], “Job Search, Phillips’ Wage Relation, and Union Influence: Theory and Evidence,” in E. S. PhelpsMicroeconomic Foundations of Employment and Inflation Theory, London: Macmillan, 53–123.
Joshi, H. E. [1981], “Secondary Workers in the Employment Cycle: Great Britain 1961–1974,” Economica, 48, 29–44.
Joshi, H., Layard, R., and Owen, S. [1981], Female Labour Supply in Post-War Britain: a Cohort Approach, Discussion Paper No. 78, Centre for Labour Economics, London School of Economics.
Joshi, H., and Owen, S. [1985], “How long is a Piece of Elastic—The Measurement of Female Activity Rates in British Censuses 1951–81,” (forthcoming).
Layard, R., Barton, M., and Zabalza, A. [1980], “Married Women’s Participation and Hours,” Economica, 47, 51–72.
Lucas, R. E., and Rapping, L. A. [1969], “Real Wages, Employment and Inflation,” Journal of Political Economy, 57, 721–754.
Mincer, J. [1962], “Labour Force Participation of Married Women; a Study of Labour Supply,” in H. G. Lewis (ed.) Aspects of Labour Economics, National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Narandranathan, W., Nickell, S., and Stern, J. [1985], “Unemployment Revisited,” Economic Journal, 95, 307–329.
Nickell, S. [1979], “The Effect of Unemployment and Related Benefits on the Duration of Unemployment,” Economic Journal, 89, 34–49.
Nickell, S. [1980], “A Picture of Male Unemployment in Britain” Economic Journal, 90, 776–794.
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys [1980], Labour Force Survey1973,1975 and 1977, Series LFS No. 1, London, HMSO.
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys [1982a], Labour Force Survey 1979, Series LFS No. 2, London: HMSO.
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys [1982b], Labour Force Survey1981, Series LFS, No. 3, London: HMSO.
Pesaran, M. H., and Slater, L. J. [1980] Dynamic Regression: Theory and Algorithms, Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
Pesaran, M. H., Smith, R., and Yeo, S. [1985], “Testing for Structural Stability and Predictive Failure: a Review,” Manchester School, 53, 280–295.
Reddaway, W. B. [1970], Effects of the Selective Employment Tax: First Report, London: HMSO.
Reddaway, W. B. [1973], Effects of the Selective Employment Tax: Final Report, Department of Applied Economics occasional paper 32, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rubery, J. [ 1978], “Structured Labour Markets, Worker Organisation and Low Pay,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2, 17–36.
Shepherd, J. [1968], “Productive Potential and the Demand for Labour,” Economic Trends (August), xxv-xxvii.
Tarling, R. J. [1981], “The Relationship Between Employment and Output: Where Does Segmentation Theory Lead Us?” in S. F. Wilkinson, ed., Dynamics of Labour Market Segmentation, London: Academic Press, 281–290.
Tarling, R. J., and Wilkinson, S. F. [1983], “The Level of Flexibility of Costs of Production,” Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge, mimeo.
Wilkinson, S. F., ed. [1981], Dynamics of Labour Market Segmentation, London: Academic Press.
Wilkinson, S. F. [1983], “Productive Systems: an Integrated Approach,” Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge, mimeo.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pesaran, M.H., Tarling, R. (1986). Changes in the U.K. Male Labor Force in the Postwar Period. In: Dogramaci, A. (eds) Measurement Issues and Behavior of Productivity Variables. Studies in Productivity Analysis, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6867-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6867-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-6869-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-6867-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive