Summary
The author reviewed and compared the results of several studies in which the geometry of a finger-joint was related to its performance.
From this review it was concluded that there is no one best design for a structural finger-joint. There are, in fact, many possible variations, all of which will perform equally well. This flexibility is felt to be good, because it allows one to make allowances for practical manufacturing considerations and still develop a joint that will give the required performance.
In designing a finger-joint it must be kept in mind that the net section of the pieces being joined must be kept as large as possible. It is this net section that has to resist the stresses that will be applied. Secondly, the strength of a finger-joint depends on the strength in shear parallel to the grain of the pieces being joined. Since the shear strength of the wood parallel to the grain is normally one-tenth or less of the tensile strength, it is apparent that the area to be stressed in shear, or the effective glue joint area, must be 8 to 10 times at least greater than the net section in order for the joint to develop a significant proportion of the tensile strength of the wood.
Maintained at Madison, Wis., in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature Cited
Louw, F. 1967. Impression versus conventional finger joints. Timber Tech. 4 (6).
Marian, J.E. 1969. Method of forming finger joints. U.S. Patent No03,480,054. Nov. 25, 1969.
Oberg, J.C. 1961. The new vs. the old in finger joints. Wood and Wood Product. (5): 35
Page, M.W. 1959. Finger jointing. The Aust. Timber J. 25(5):82–95. 5.
Pavlov, V.P. 1954. Joining wood longitudinally with toothed tenons. Transi. from Denoaopenerabalyvaishrica I Les oknemicheskaia Promzehlennost (Wood Process. and Wood Chem, Ind.) 3(10):5–8
Richards, D.B. 1963. Improved tips for finger joints. For. Prod. J. 13 (6): 250.
Selbo, M.L. 1963. Effect of joint geometry on tensile strength of finger joints. For. Prod. J. 13 (9).
Strickler, M.D. 1967, Impression finger jointing of lumber. For, Prod. J. 17 (10); 23–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 The United Nations, New York and Martinus Nijhoff / Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jokerst, R.W. (1982). The Effect of Geometry on the Performance of Structural Finger-Joints. In: Prins, C.F.L. (eds) Production, Marketing and Use of Finger-Jointed Sawnwood. Forestry Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-3859-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-3859-6_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-3769-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-3859-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive