Skip to main content
  • 80 Accesses

Abstract

The painters who flourished at the end of the 14th century and whose activity extended even into the first years of the 15th offer us the proof of the persistence of Simone Martini’s influence. Duccio’s models had long since been forgotten, and the Lorenzetti’s abandoned after two generations, but artists like Taddeo Bartolo, Andrea di Bartolo and Martino di Bartolommeo reproduced, in a slightly modernized form, the figures of Simone Martini. All three were very productive artists, but rather monotonous and lacking in inspiration. None of them attained the spiritual grace of Simone’s art, which they followed in a rather commonplace manner. It is obvious that the tradition was handed down to them by artists of the previous generation, such as Andrea Vanni or Bartolo di Fredi, who themselves were only adherents of Simone’s art, but not the master’s contemporaries. One would say, however, that the artists of the end of the 14th century also worked directly from Simone’s paintings, and this is extremely likely in a city which at that period must have been full of the great master’s productions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. A. Liberati, Un nuovo documento su Taddeo di Bartolo, Rassegna d’Arte Senese, 1921, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  2. In the catalogue and by Suida (L’Arte, 1907, p. 183) this picture is ascribed to Barnaba da Modena, no doubt on account of the texture of the Virgin’s dress.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Venturi, Nicola da Voltri, L’Arte, 1918, p. 269.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Ricci, Il Palazzo Pubblico di Siena etc., fig. 58. Perkins, in Rassegna d’Arte, Oct. 1904. The picture is signed: “Tadeus de Sens me pinxit”.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fogg Art Museum, Collection of Mediaeval and Renaissance Paintings, p. 114. Perkins, Rassegna d’Arte Senese, 1908, p. 8. Breck, Rassegna d’Arte, 1909, p. 169. In the oratory of St. Antony at Volterra there was once an altar-piece of 1418, but the signature seems to have been slightly different: “Taddeus Bartoli de Senis hoc opus pinxit”. Moreover, Vasari-Milanesi, II, p. 38 note i, mentions only saints as the subject of this picture.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Ricci, Il Palazzo Pubblico etc., fig. 57 and Rossi, Rassegna d’Arte Senese, 1915, p. 43 both attribute it to Taddeo’s school, but I think it is really a work from the master’s own hand.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. de Nicola, in Thieme Becker, Künstler-Lexikon, 1, p. 449. The Same, Andrea di Bartolo, Rassegna d’Arte Senese, 1921, p. 12. Langton Douglas, appendix to chap. II of Cr. and Cavalc., III, p. 134. G. Milanesi, Sulla Storia dell’ arte Toscana, scritti vari, Siena, 1873, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lusini, Il Duomo di Siena, Siena, 1911, p. 343, note 204.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Förster, Zahn’s Jahrb. f. Kunstwiss., VI, p. 138. B. Berenson, Le pitture italiane nella raccolta Yerkes, Rassegna d’Arte, 1906, p. 35. This picture does not belong to the Metropolitan Museum as one might understand from Mr. Berenson’s article.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Messrs. Berenson, Langton Douglas and De Nicola give very different versions of this inscription. As I do not know the original, I follow the one given by the last authority.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Proclaimed as a work of Andrea’s by Mr. Perkins, Rassegna d’Arte, 1914, p. too, but with much hesitation, for which I see rio reason.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Perkins, Rassegna d’Arte Senese, 1908, p. 84. The Same, Rassegna d’Arte,’911, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Perkins, Art in America, 192o, p. 292.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1924 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Marle, R. (1924). Minor Masters of the End of the XIV Century. In: The Development of the Italian Schools of Painting. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-2798-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-2798-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-1661-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-2798-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics