Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Development of the Italian Schools of Painting pp 212–319Cite as

The Marches

  • Chapter

  • 65 Accesses

Abstract

The fact that Gentile da Fabriano, who is one of the outstanding figures of Gothic painting of the beginning of the 15th century in Italy, was a native of The Marches, where besides he was active for a certain length of time, explains why so many adherents of this movement were strongly influenced by him. Nevertheless in this province there were two painters, the brothers Lorenzo the First and Jacopo Salimbeni of Sanseverino who represented the cosmopolitan Gothic current of the beginning of the 15th century in The Marches and who did not show a more direct connexion with Gentile’s manner than can be accounted for by the fact that both they and Gentile belonged to the same artistic movement. As will be seen later on, the Salimbeni brothers show a more marked northern element in their art.

A. Ricci, Memorie storiche dell’ arte e degli artisti della Marca di Ancona, I. C. Ferreti, Memorie storico-critiche dei pittori anconitani, Ancona, 1883. G. B. Cavalcaselle e Morelli, Catalogo delle opere d’arte nelle Marche, Gallerie Nazionali, II, 1896, p. 191, Natale, I pittori marchigiani anteriori a Raffaello, Rivista marchigiana moderna, VI, 1902, p. 56. C. Ricci, La pittura antica alla mostra di Macerata, Emporium, 1906. Perkins, Note sull’ esposizione d’arte marchigiana, Rassegna d’Arte, 1906, p. 49. U. Gnoli, Lorenzo e Jacopo Salimbeni, Rassegna d’Arte Umbra, II, 1911, p. I. Rassegna Marchigiana which appears from 1922 on. L. Serra, Le gallerie comunali delle Marche, Roma (1924).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Colasanti, Lorenzo e Jacopo Salimbeni da Sanseverino, Bolletino d’Arte del Minist. della Pubbl. Istruz., IV, 1910, p. 409.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gnoli, op. cit., informs us that in the inscription some letters follow the date 1400, so that it might be that the panel was executed a few years after 3400 and consequently Lorenzo was born after 1374. In any case it is a production of an early stage in his career and the difference cannot be very great.

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. E. Aleandri, Sulla famiglia dei pittori Lorenzo e Giacomo da Sanseverino-Marche, Sanseverino, 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Servanzi Collio, Pitture nella chiesa di S. Giovanni di Urbino eseguite dai fratelli Lorenzo e Giacomo di Sanseverino, Sanseverino, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Lipparini, Gli affreschi di S. Giovanni Battista in Urbino e la pittura umbra primitiva, Cosmos Catolicus, IV, 1903, p. 760.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. B. Toschi, Degli affreschi di fratelli Lorenzo e Jacopo Sanseverino nel oratorio di San Giovanni in Urbino, Italia artistica illustrata, II, 1884.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Destrée, Gli affreschi dei fratelli Salimbeni nell’ oratorio di S. Giovanni in I Trbino, Arte Moderna, Nov. 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Servanzi Collio, Pitture a fresco scoperte nell’ antica cattedrale di. Sanseverino etc., L’Album, 1860, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. E. Aleandri, II Duomo di Sanseverino-Marche, Sanseverino, 1905. (Colasanti, op. cit., p. 422 and a, p. 430).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Gianandrea, Olivuccio di Ceccarello, Nuova Rivista Misena, 1891, P. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Colasanti, op. cit., p. 431, attributes this picture to Lorenzo. Venturi, Storia dell’ arte italiana, VIII, p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Vaccaj. Pesaro, Bergamo, 1909, p. 106, ascribed it to the school of Sanseverino. L. Serra, Pinacoteca e Museo delle Ceramiche di Pesaro, 2ii1 ed., Pesaro, 1920, p. 12, also doubts the correctness of this attribution.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R Schiff, Ritrovamento di un dipinto di Lorenzo Salembeni di Sanseverino, L’Arte, 1907, p. 375.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Berenson, The Central Italian Painters of the Renaissance, 2nd ed., New York-London, 1909, p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Venturi, Storia dell’ arte italiana, VII. p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gualandi, Memorie originali italiane risguardanti le belle arti, VI. Bologna, 1845, p. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Feliciangeli. Pittori camerinesi del Quattrocento, extract from Chienti e Potenza (y. recension, L’Arte, 1911, p. 77 ).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Venturi, Di Arcangelo di Cola da Camerino, L’Arte. 1910, p. 377.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Colasanti, Nuovi dipinti di Arcangelo di Cola da Camerino, Bolletino d’Arte del Minist. della Pubbl. Istr., 1922, p. 539. Before this he ascribed it to Gentile’s school: A. Colasanti, Gentile da Fabriano, Bergamo, 1919, p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Venturi, Quadri di Gentile da Fabriano a Milano e a Pietroburgo, L’Arte, 1898, p. 495.

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. De Nicola, Di alcuni dipinti del Casentino, L’Arte, 1914, p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  22. U. Gnoli, Pietro da Montepulciano e Giacomo da Recanati, Bolletinci d’Arte del Minist. della Pubbl. Istr., 1922, p. 574.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M Santoni, Nuova Rivista Misena, 2890, p. 187;

    Google Scholar 

  24. J Brech, Die Neuerwerbungen des Metropolitan Museum in New York, Cicerone, 1909, p 292, is of opinion that Pietro belonged to the Umbrian school but worked under a Sienese influence which reached him through Allegretto Nuzi. Regarding the picture in New York v. also the Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum, June 19o8, p 117.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. Schulz, Denkmäler der Kunst des Mittelalters in Unteritalien, III, Dresden, 1860, p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rosini, Storia della pittura italiana, IIh, Pisa, 1841, p, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. Venturi, op. cit. Reprod. Rassegna Marchigiana,July—Sept. 1985, p1. V I.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Venturi, Storia dell’ arte italiana, VII’, p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Colasanti, Un seguace di Gentile da Fabriano a Fermo, Boll. d’Arte del Minist della Pubbl. Istr., July 1908. The Same, Gentile da Fabriano, p. 84. A. Venturi, op. cit., p. 186, believes them to be by a painter from the district of Romagna.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vogel, De Ecclesiis Recanatensi et Lauretana, I, Recanati, 1859, p. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vasari, ed. Milanesi, I, p. 641. Pungileoni, Elogio stor. di Timoteo Viti, Urbino, 1835, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  32. E. Calini, Urbino e i suoi monumenti, 1897, p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. Calini, in Thieme Becker, Künstlerlexikon, I, Leipzig, 1907, p. 589 (with a bibliography) Rivista Ligure di Scienze, Lettere ed Arte, XXIV, p 249.

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. Zaccarini, Antonio Alberti it suo maestro ed alcuni pittori ferraresi loro contemporanei, L’Arte, 1914, p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  35. L, Venturi, Bolletino d’Arte del Minist. della Pubbl. Istr.. 1914, p. 307. compares these frescoes with the art of Giambono.

    Google Scholar 

  36. M. Salmi, Dipinti del Quattrocento a Citta di Castello, Bollet. della R. Deput. di Stor. Patr. per l’Umbria, XXIV, 1920, Nos. 62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. Sassi, Una chiesa antica chi scompare, Fabriano, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  38. U. Gnoli, L’Arte umbra alla Mostra di Perugia, Bergamo, 1908, p. 28, figs. 13 and 50. Colasanti, Gentile da Fabriano,pp. 64, 67.

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. Sassi, Documenti di pittori fabrianese, Rassegna Marchigiana, III, 1924, P. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  40. D. P. Pirri, Una pittura storica di Cola di Pietro da Camerino in S. Maria di Vallo di Nera, Arch perla Stor eccles. dell’ Umbria IV, 1907, p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  41. E. Muntz, Les Arts à la cour des Papes, I, Paris, 1878, p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  42. C. Astolfi, La Porziuncola Marchigiana, Rassegna Marchigiana, IV. 1926. p. 414.

    Google Scholar 

  43. A. Colasanti, La chiesa Farfense di S. Vittoria in Matenano e i suoi affreschi, Emporium, XXIII, 1906, p. 203.

    Google Scholar 

  44. This picture was published as a work of the school of Lorenzo Monaco by L. Serra, Bolletino d’arte del Minist. della Pubbl. Istr, 1921, p. 274.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Attributed to Jacobello del Fiore by L. Planiscig, Jacobello del Fiore, Jahrb. der Kunsthist. Samml. in Wien. Neue Folge, I, 1926, p. 83, v. Vol VII, p. 352.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Raimond van Marle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1927 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Marle, R. (1927). The Marches. In: The Development of the Italian Schools of Painting. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-2790-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-2790-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-1657-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-2790-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation