Skip to main content

Impacts in Mexico of Colorado River Management in the United States

A History of Neglect, A Future of Uncertainty

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Advances in Global Change Research ((AGLO,volume 16))

Abstract

The Colorado River terminates in Mexico as a threaded delta above the Sea of Cortez (Gulf of California). Decades of water depletion, enabled largely by water projects in the United States, resulted in little or no water flowing in the channel. This lack of water has caused losses of wetlands, riparian vegetation, and estuarine habitat, reducing fish and wildlife populations, including some endangered species. Cucupá Indians who depended on fishing and gathering lost their traditional occupations. Recent years of high runoff revitalized the ecosystems of the Colorado River Delta and this animated nongovernmental organizations and scientists to call attention to the issue. Water users in the United States have objected in principle to addressing the issue because they resist the concept of ensuring the delivery of additional water to Mexico beyond current legal requirements, even in the small quantities needed for ecological maintenance. Mexico has not formulated a clear official position on the issue. Past transboundary water conflicts between the two countries over the quantity and quality of Colorado River water owed by the United States to Mexico have been characterized by neglect, followed by vigorous protest from Mexico, strong U.S. resistance from states and water users, and finally belated concessions at a high diplomatic level. There are several possible remedies to the delta problem that would help the countries avoid the conflictive approach of the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bates, S.T., D.H. Getches, L.J. MacDonnell, and C.F. Wilkinson. 1993. Searching Out the Headwaters: Change and Rediscovery in Western Water Law. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulder Canyon Project Act. 1928. U.S. Cod e. Vol. 43, sec. 617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P.L. 1986. Law of the River: A critique of an extraordinary legal system. In, Weatherford, G.D., and F.L. Brown (eds.), New Courses for the Colorado River: Major Issues for the Next Century. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J., M. Clinton, P. Cunningham, D.H. Getches, J.L. Lopezgamez, M.H. McKeith, L.O. Martinez Morales, B. Bogado, J. Palafox, and C. Valdés-Casillas. 2001. Immediate Options for Augmenting Water Flows to the Colorado River Delta in Mexico. Report prepared for The David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Los Altos, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colorado River Basin Project Act. 1968. U.S. Public Law 537. 90th Congress, 2nd sess., 30 September 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act. 1974. U.S. Public Law 320. 93rd Congress, 2nd sess., 24 June 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colorado River Compact of 1922. Colorado Revised Statutes, Sec. 37–61–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culp, P.W. 2001. Feasibility of Purchase and Transfer for Instream Water for Instream Flow in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Tucson, Arizona: Udall Center Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amours, P. 2001. The Colorado River Delta. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy. Yearbook 2000: 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dregne, H.E. 1975. Salinity aspects of the Colorado River Agreement. Natural Resources Journal15(1): 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register. 2002. Review of Existing Coordinate Long Range Operating Criteria for Colorado River Reservoirs. 67: 1986–1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register. 2001. Colorado River Interim Surplus Guidelines. 66: 7772–7782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register. 2000. Colorado River Interim Surplus Criteria. 65: 48531–48537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register. 1999. Multi-Species Conservation Program (MSCP) for the Lower Colorado River, Arizona, Nevada, and California. 64: 27000–27002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fradkin, P. 1995. A River No More, 2d ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, K.D., and P.H. Gleick. 1999. Water and Global Climate Change: Potential Impacts on U.S. Water Resources. Arlington, Virgina: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin, J.F. 1988. The international problem with Mexico over the salinity of the Lower Colorado River. In, Getches, D.H., Water and the American West: Essays in Honor of Raphael J. Moses, Boulder, Colorado: Natural Resources Law Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getches, D.H. 1985. Competing demands for the Colorado River. University of Colorado Law Review56(3): 413–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getches, D.H. 1997. Colorado River governance: Sharing federal authority as an incentive to create a new institution. University of Colorado Law Review68(3): 573–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E.P., R.S. Feiger, A. Burquez, and D.S. Turner. 1992. Cienega de Santa Clara: Endangered wetland in the Colorado River Delta, Sonora, Mexico. Natural Resources Journal32(4): 817–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E.P., C. Lee, R. Feiger, and S. Zengel. 1996. Effects of water management on the wetlands of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico. Conservation Biology10(4): 1175 – 1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glennon, R.J., and P.W. Culp. 2002. The Last Green Lagoon: How and why the Bush Administration should save the Colorado River Delta. Ecology Law Quarterly28(4): 903–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, F., and D.H. Getches. n.d. Severe, Sustained Drought in the Southwestern United States: Phase I Report. A report on research supported by the U.S. Department of State, Man and Biosphere Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardison, C.H. 1972. Potential United States water-supply development. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division. 1972 Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers (September): 479–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D.L. 1991. The All-American Canal Lining Project: A catalyst for rational and comprehensive groundwater management on the United States-Mexico border. Natural Resources Journal31(4): 803–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holburt, M.B. 1975. International problems of the Colorado River. Natural Resources Journal15(1): 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundley, N., Jr. 1975. Water and the West: The Colorado River Compact and the Politics of Water in the American West. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundley, N., Jr. 1992. The Great Thirst: Californians and Water, 1770s-1990s. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. [1949]. A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. Reprint, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lochhead, J.S. 2001. An Upper Basin perspective on California’s claims to water from the Colorado River. Part I: The Law of the River. University of Denver Water Law Review4(2): 290–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luecke, D.F., J. Pitt, C. Congdon, E. Glenn, C. Valés-Casillas, and M. Briggs. 1999. A Delta Once More: Restoring Riparian and Wetland Habitat in the Colorado River Delta. Environmental Defense Fund Report, available from EDF Publications, 1875 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcum, C. 1998. “River Master” Takes Charge. South Carolina Environmental Law Journal7 (1): 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. 1989. A Story that Stands Like a Dam. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, C.J. 1966. The Colorado River. Stanford Law Review19: 1–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, C.J., and R.L. Noble. 1967. The Colorado River: The Treaty with Mexico. Stanford Law Review19:367–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, S.M. 2000. Defining hydrocommons governance along the border of the Californias: A case study of transbasin diversions and water quality in the Tijuana-San Diego metropolitan region. Natural Resources Journal40(4): 931–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milich, L., and R.G. Varady. 1999. Openness, sustainability, and public participation: New designs for transboundary river basin institutions. Journal of Environment & Development8(3): 258–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T.O., G.D. Weatherford, and J.E. Thorson. 1986. The Salty Colorado. Washington, D.C: The Conservation Foundation and the John Muir Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumme, S.P. 1999. Managing acute water scarcity on the U.S.-Mexico border: Institutional issues raised by the 1990’s drought. Natural Resources Journal39(1): 149–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumme, S.P. 2000. Minute 242 and beyond: Challenges and opportunities for managing transboundary groundwater on the Mexico-U.S. border. Natural Resources Journal40(2): 341–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumme, S.P., and P. Duncan. 1996. The Commission on Environmental Cooperation and the U.S.-Mexico border environment. Journal of Environment & Development5(2): 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, J., D.F. Luecke, M.J. Cohen, E.P. Glenn, and C. Valdés-Castillas. 2000. Two countries, one river: Managing for nature in the Colorado River Delta. Natural Resources Journal40(4): 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieke, E.A. 1996. The Bay-Delta Accord: A stride toward sustainability. University of Colorado Law Review67(2): 341–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisner, M. 1986. Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salton Sea Reclamation Act of 1998. U.S. Public Law 372. 105th Congress, 2nd sess., 12 November 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockton, C.W., and G.C. Jacoby, Jr. 1976. Long-term surface water supply and streamflow trends in the Upper Colorado River Basin based on tree-ring analysis. Lake Powell Research Project Bulletin 18, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treaty Respecting Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande. February 3, 1944. U.S. Statutes at Large59: 1219–1267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upper Colorado River Basin Compact. 1949. U.S. Statutes at Large63: 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés-Casillas, C., E.P. Glenn, O. Hinojosa-Huerta, Y. Carillo-Guerrerro, J. García-Hernandez, F. Zamora-Arroyo, M. Muñoz-Viveros, M. Briggs, C. Lee, E. Chavarría-Correa, J. Riley, D. Baumgartner, and C. Condon. 1998. Wetland Management and Restoration in the Colorado River Delta: The First Steps. Special publication of CECARENA-ITESM Campus Guaymas and NAWCC, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, E. 1999. Two rivers, two nations, one history: The transformation of the Colorado River Delta since 1940. Frontera Norte11:113–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigington, R., and D. Pontius. 1996. Toward range-wide integration of recovery implementation programs for the endangered fishes of the Colorado River. In, The Colorado River Workshop: Issues, Ideas, and Directions. Sponsored by the Grand Canyon Trust under a cooperative agreement with the Bureau of Reclamation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F. 1994. A fish out of water: A proposal for international instream flow rights in the lower Colorado River. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy5(1): 249–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zengel, S.A., V.J. Meretsky, E.P. Glenn, R.S. Feiger, and D. Ortiz. 1995. Ciénega de Santa Cara, a remnant wetland in the Río Colorado Delta (Mexico): Vegetation distribution and the effects of water flow reduction. Ecological Engineering4: 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Getches, D.H. (2003). Impacts in Mexico of Colorado River Management in the United States. In: Diaz, H.F., Morehouse, B.J. (eds) Climate and Water. Advances in Global Change Research, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1250-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1250-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6386-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-1250-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics