Abstract
The various methods of bringing international agreements into effect contribute, by their very nature, to considerable confusion in the field of constitutional law. All international agreements have the same binding effect in international law, and for all practical purposes may be called “treaties.”1 But a treaty in United States constitutional law exists only if it has received approval by two-thirds of the Senate. In order to differentiate between treaties and other international agreements, the term “executive agreement” is often used loosely to apply to the latter type.2 This is a misnomer for the entire class because “executive” applies to the President, and the inference derives that only Presidential power is involved when international agreements other than treaties are denominated. Of course, the powers of the President and Congress may be involved, as distinct from the powers of the President alone or in conjunction with the Senate’s power.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Justin H. Smith, The Annexation of Texas (corrected edition; New York: Barnes & Noble, Inc., 1941), pp. 273–345
Wallace McClure, International Executive Agreements (New York: Columbia IJniversity Press, 1941), pp. 68–69.
Robert A. Dahl, Congress and Foreign Policy (New Haven: Yale Institute of International Studies, 1949), pp. 38–39.
Myres S. McDougal and Asher Lans, “Treaties and Congressional-Executive or Presidential Agreements: Interchangeable Instruments of National Policy,” Yale Law Journal, 64: 181–634, March, June, 1945.
David M. Levitan, “Executive Agreements: A Study of the Executive in the Control of the Foreign Relations of the United States,” Illinois Law Review, 35: 395, 1940.
Myres S. McDougal and Asher Lans, “Treaties and Congressional-Executive or Presidential Agreements: Interchangeable Instruments of National Policy” Yale Law Journal, 54: 181–534, March, June, 1945.
Edward S. Corwin, National Supremacy: Treaty Power Vs. State Power (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1913), p. 95.
Edward S. Corwin, The Constitution and World Organization (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944), p. 17.
Edward S. Corwin, The President: Office and Powers (third edition; New York: New York University Press, 1948), p. 263.
Chandler P. Anderson, “Treaties As Domestic Law,” American Journal of International Law, 29: 472, July, 1935.
Chandler P. Anderson, “The Extent and Limitations of the Treaty-Making Power Under the Constitution,” American Journal of International Law, 1: 636, July, 1907
Manley O. Hudson, International Legislation (Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1931), I, 1vii.
Nathan Schachner, The Founding Fathers (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1954), p. 456
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1960 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Byrd, E.M. (1960). Joint Congressional-Executive Actions. In: Treaties and Executive Agreements in the United States. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1073-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1073-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0435-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-1073-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive