Abstract
We are so used to revolutions that we accept them as normal occurrences. It is therefore difficult to remember what an immense shock the French Revolution was, not only to those who were immediately affected, but to those Europeans who merely observed its course from a distance. No writer can remind us more forcefully than Hegel of how shaking an impact these events had. Fifteen years after its outbreak Hegel saw nothing less than the end and fulfillment of the European spirit in the French Revolution. If there was to be a future, his own age, an “age of transition”, could not know it.1 Politically it was a vacuum. Europe was in an indefinable condition about which nothing could be said. Its only immediate achievement, German philosophy, had explicated the moral implication of the Revolution. As such it was a spiritual completion, and Hegel found it wanting in many respects. It was purely a triumph of intellectual fulfillment, not a sign of new possibilities. The real philosophical reward for having seen the disintegration of Europe’s religious and secular spirit was to understand its meaning. It was the historical equivalent of being at the end of time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
B. 75; H. 15.
B. 509–511;H. 347–349.
De l’Esprit des Lois, XIX, 4.
B. 458; H. 314.
B. 458–459; H. 314–315.
B. 459; H. 315.
B. 459–460; H. 315. I find this phrase untranslatable but would render it as “the true, active character of a community”.
B. 88–89, 90–91, 105–106, 800–802, 807–808; H. 26, 27–28, 39, 558–560, 563–564.
B. 460; H. 315–316.
B. 461; H. 316.
B. 75–77; H. 15–17.
Esprit, IV, 2. My italics.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Confessions, IX.
B. 90; H. 27.
B. 89; H. 26–27.
B. 514–517; H. 351–353.
B. 518; H. 353–354.
B. 519; H. 354.
B. 519–520; H. 353–354, 358.
B. 527–528; H. 360–361.
B. 538–539; H. 367.
B. 520; H. 355.
B. 525; H. 359.
B. 522–523; H. 357.
B. 524–525, 526–528; H. 358–361.
B. 527; H. 360.
B. 525; H. 359.
B. 527–528; H. 360–361.
B. 528–529; H. 361.
B. 529; H. 361–362.
Esprit, XX, 1, 6.
Ibid., XXI, 20.
B. 530; H. 362–363.
B. 531–532; H. 363–364.
B. 533; H. 364.
B. 533–534; H. 365–366.
B. 534–535; H. 366.
B. 535; H. 366.
B. 536–538; H. 367–369.
B. 542–543; H. 372–373.
B. 541; H. 371.
B. 547–548; H. 375–376. Hegel’s immediate appreciation of Diderot’s masterpiece does him much honor. The work first appeared in Goethe’s translation in 1805, just as Hegel was preparing the Phenomenology. According to Goethe absolutely nobody in Germany would read Diderot’s work, because the spirit of fervid nationalism made them hostile to everything French. Clearly Goethe had at least one distinguished reader and Diderot a perceptive admirer in Hegel who never wavered in his admiration for France and for French literary culture. It may be worth noting that he did not follow Goethe’s interpretation of the dialogue. Goethe saw it as a psychological portrait of a well-known Parisian character, Hegel as the picture of a general spiritual phenomenon. These two approaches remain the two main lines of interpretation even now. See Goethe, Nachträgliches zu Rameau’s Neffe, Werke, 45, I. Weimar, 1900, p. 221–238.
B. 519; H. 354.
B. 460; H. 315.
B. 512; H. 349–350.
B. 513; H. 530.
B. 553–554; H. 379.
B. 554–555; H. 380; G. E. Lessing, Die Erziehung des Menschengeschlechtes, passim.
B. 797–799; H. 556.
B. 555;H. 380.
B. 555–556; H. 380–381.
B. 553; H. 379.
B. 557; H. 382.
B. 556; H. 383.
B. 562, 569–570; H. 385–386, 392.
B. 560; H. 384–385.
B. 562–563; H. 385–387.
B. 563–565; H. 387–388.
B. 564–565; H. 388.
Sur la Destruction des Jésuites en France, Oeuvres Complètes de d’Alembert, Genève, 1967, II, pp. 48–49.
Rousseau Juge de Jean-Jacques, Oeuvres Complètes, Paris, 1959, 1, pp. 967–968.
B. 565–566, 582; H. 389, 401.
B. 566–568; H. 389–391.
B. 571–573, 584–585; H. 393–395; 403–404.
B. 581; H. 400.
B. 512; H. 349–350.
Pensées, Oeuvres Complètes edited by Jacques Chevallier, Paris, 1954, pp. 335, 451.
Ibid., p. 588.
Lettres Philosophiques edited by Gustave Lanson and A. M. Rousseau, Paris, 1964, II, pp. 205–207.
Ibid., II, pp. 196–197.
Ibid., II, pp. 202, 213, 187–188. 72 B. 585–587; H. 404–405.
B. 574–575; H. 395–396.
B. 581–582, 587–588; H. 401, 405–406.
B. 580; H. 400.
B. 594–595; H. 411.
B. 583; H. 402.
B. 578–580; H. 399–400.
B. 598; H. 413.
B. 73–74; H. 14–15.
B. 333; H. 225. 82 B. 364; H. 248. 83 B. 334–336; H. 225–227.
B. 588–589; H. 406.
B. 512; H. 350.
B. 599; H. 414.
B. 608; H. 421.
B. 599–600; H. 414–415.
These remarks owe much to Jean Belin, La Logique d’Une Idée Force: Vidée d’Utilité Sociale Pendant La Révolution Française (1789–1792). Paris, 1939.
B. 602; H. 416.
B. 600; H. 415.
B. 601; H. 415.
B. 601–602; H. 416.
B. 603; H. 417.
Esquisse d’un Tableau Historique des Progrès de l’Esprit Humain, Oeuvres, Paris, 1847, VI, 198–202.
B. 603–604; H. 417.
B. 604; H. 418.
See the author’s Men and Citizens, Cambridge, 1969, pp. 204–212.
B. 606–607; H. 419–420.
B. 607; H. 420.
B. 602–603; H. 416–417.
The Peloponnesian War, III, s. 81.
B. 607–608; H. 420–421.
B. 608–610, 613–614; H. 421–424.
The Philosophy of History edited by C. J. Friedrich, New York, 1956, p. 453.
Lectures on the History of Philosophy translated by E. S. Haldane, London, 1892, III, pp. 388–390.
Ibid., p. 391.
B. 807–808; H. 563–564.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1971 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shklar, J.N. (1971). Hegel’s Phenomenology: Paths to Revolution. In: von Beyme, K. (eds) Theory and Politics / Theorie und Politik. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1063-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1063-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0429-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-1063-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive