Skip to main content
  • 37 Accesses

Abstract

Henry Longueville Mansel published his Bampton Lectures in 1858, twenty-seven years after Hegel’s death and twelve years before the publication of Ritschl’s Rechtfertigung und Versoehnung. The timing is significant. As a sweeping critique of liberalism, frequently symbolized by the work of Hegel, the lectures react to the slow but inexorable permeation of English religious thought by German ways of thinking. By 1858, the process was sufficiently widespread that Mansel felt justified in devoting the principal portion of his work to the attack. Ritschl marks the effective end of Hegel’s direct influence on theology and a return to a more Kantian mode of thinking. His gambit had already been made, for Mansel is in many ways a more cautious version of Ritschl. Mansel, however, wrote in English and had the misfortune to say what he did at the beginning of a movement so strong that it allowed no qualification. Thus Mansel’s thought was rarely accepted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Earl of Carnarvon, “Introduction,” Mansel: The Gnostic Heresies of the First and Second Centuries (London: John Murray, 1875), p. x.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Quoted in Arthur Michael Ramsey, F. D. Maurice (Cambridge: University Press, 1951), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leslie Stephen, The English Utilitarians, III (London: Duckworth and Co., 1912), p. 432, (first published in 1900).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. M. G. Reardon, Religious Thought in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: University Press, 1966), p. 288.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. W. R. Matthews, The Religious Philosophy of Dean Mansel (London: Oxford University Press, 1956), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Herman Randall, Jr., The Role of Knowledge in Western Religion (Boston: Starr King Press, 1958), pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edwyn Bevan, Symbolism and Belief (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957), p. 337.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henry Mansel, The Limits of Religious Thought (5th ed., London: John Murray, 1867), p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison (New York: Macmillan Paperbacks, 1953), p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mansel’s various articles were collected after his death in the volume Letters, Lectures, and Reviews, ed. Henry W. Chandler (London: John Murray, 1873).

    Google Scholar 

  11. John William Burgon, Lives of Twelve Good Men, II (New York: Scribner & Welford, 1888), p. 184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1969 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Freeman, K.D. (1969). Introduction. In: The Role of Reason in Religion: A Study of Henry Mansel. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1027-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1027-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0411-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-1027-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics