Skip to main content
  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

The allied expeditions had arrived in the East committed to the defense of Turkey and particularly the city of Constantinople, if it were not yet too late to save either. With the evacuation of the Principalities following the abandonment of the siege of Silistria, the British and French leaders were caught with no definite plans for future operations. The decisions of the “engineers” in Paris and London had not looked beyond the defense of Turkey in Europe.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kinglake, I, 391; Bapst, II, 156; and Pierre F. J. Bosquet, Lettres du Maréchal Bosquet à ses Amis, 1837–1860 (2 vols., Pau, 1879), II, 147.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Partly because of orders from home; see Jean Paul Bédarrides, Journal Humoristique du Siège de Sébastopol (2 vols., Paris, 1867), I, 177. The British transport service had already broken down and possibly Raglan could not have advanced towards the Danube had he wanted to since “the army would have starved” according to John Adyre, A Review of the Crimean War to the Winter of 1854–1855 (London, 1860), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sterling, p. 27; Heath, p. 43; Lysons, p. 67; and Lawrence Shadwell, The Life of Colin Campbell, Lord Clyde (2 vols., London, 1881), I, 320.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hamley, pp. 25-27; and Spencer Walpole “Great Britain and the Crimean War (1852–1856),” Cambridge Modern History (14 vols., Cambridge, Eng., 1902–1912), XI, p. 318.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. W. Seton-Watson, Britain in Europe 1789–1914 (New York, 1937), p. 331; Ch. Seignobos, La Révolution de 1848 — Le Second Empire, in E. Lavisse, ed., Histoire de France Contemporaine (10 vols., Paris, 1920–1922), VI, 312–313; D. Bonner-Smith and A.C. Dewar, eds., Russian War, 1854 — Baltic and Black Sea Official Correspondence (London, 1943), p. 217; and Adyre, pp. 20-23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eduard I. Todleben, Défense de Sébastopol (2 vols., St. Petersburg, 1863-1874), I, Part I, 153, 155-156, 165; and Annual Register (1854), p. 291.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henry Cochin, Augustin Cochin 1823–1872: Ses Lettres et Sa Vie (2 vols., Paris, 1926), I, 125–126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1959 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gooch, B.D. (1959). Invasion and a Clash of Arms. In: The New Bonapartist Generals in the Crimean War. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1001-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1001-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0398-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-1001-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics