Skip to main content

Privileges and Immunities in International Law

  • Chapter
  • 159 Accesses

Abstract

In general, every State has the exclusive right to exercise jurisdiction within its own territory. This jurisdiction is not absolute because it is subject to certain limitations imposed by international law. One instance where a State agrees to waive a part of its territorial sovereignty relates to foreign States who are accorded certain privileges and immunities. The rule of State immunity from suit in foreign courts is based upon and firmly grounded on the principles of independence, equality, and the dignity of States, which are deemed to be three characteristics of statehood. In fact, the well known maxim par in parem non habet imperium has been derived from these principles. Two different points of view exist on the subject of State immunity from suit in foreign courts. According to the classical or absolute doctrine of sovereign immunity,1 immunity is granted ratione personae, irrespective of the nature of the act involved. On the other hand, the restrictive or newer theory of sovereign immunity draws a distinction between acts performed by a State in its sovereign capacity i.e. acts jure imperii and private acts i.e. acts jure gestionis, immunity being restricted only to acts jure imperii.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hersch Lauterpacht, “The Problem of Jurisdictional Immunities of Foreign States,” B.Y.I.L., 28 (1951), p. 248.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. F. Lalive, “L’immunité De Jurisdiction Des Etats Et Des Organisations Internationales,” Recueil Des Cours, 84 (1953, 111), pp. 209–389;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michael Brandon, “Sovereign Immunity of Government-Owned Corporations and Ships,” Cornell Law Quarterly, 39 (1954), pp. 425–462;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Manuel R. Garcia-Mora, “The Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity of Foreign States and its Recent Modifications,” Virginia Law Review, 42 (1956), PP 335–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DH. N. Johnson, “Some Recent Trends in the Law Regarding the Juris-dictional Immunities of Foreign States,” Revue De Droit International Pour Le Moyen-Orient, June 1957, No. 1, pp. 1–17;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clive M. Schmitthoff, “The Claim of Sovereign Immunity in the Law of International Trade,” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 7 (1958), pp. 452–467;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Friedmann, Law in a Changing Society (London: Stevens & Sons Ltd., 1959), pp. 420–425.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. G. Hackworth, Digest of International Law (Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1941), Vol. II, p. 439.

    Google Scholar 

  9. William W. Bishop D, Jr., “New United States Policy Limiting Sovereign Immunity,” A.J.I.L., 47 (1953), P. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. B. Lyons, “Immunities other than Jurisdictional of Property of Diplomatic Envoys,” B.Y.I.L., 30 (1953), pp. 116–151

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. B. Lyons, “Personal Immunities of Diplomatic Agents,” B.Y.I.L., 31 (1954), pp. 299–340.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Lauterpacht, “The Codification of the Law of Diplo-matic Immunity,” The Grotius Society Transactions for the year 1954, Vol. 40, pp. 73–74.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. C. Holland, “Diplomatic Immunity in English Law,” Current Legal Problems, 4 (1951), p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murray L. Schwartz, “International Law and the Nato Status of Forces Agreement,” Columbia Law Review, 53 (1953), pp. 1091–1113;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dr. G. P. Barton, “Foreign Armed Forces: Qualified Jurisdictional Immunity,” B.Y.I.L., 31 (1954), pp. 341-370.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Herman Phleger, “Some Recent Developments in International Law of Interest to the United States,” The Department of State Bulletin, 30 (1954), pp. 198–199.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1964 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahluwalia, K. (1964). Privileges and Immunities in International Law. In: The Legal Status, Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies of the United Nations and Certain Other International Organizations. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0989-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0989-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0392-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0989-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics