Skip to main content

Civil Jurisdiction over Aircraft

  • Chapter
The Legal Status of Aircraft
  • 92 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapters we have seen that the air space above the territory of a particular State is subject to the sovereignty of that State, that the aircraft possesses a nationality and that it must be regarded as movable property sui generis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. De Bustamante, “Droit International Public,” III, p. 158. 2 McNair, “The Law of the Air,” p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bourquin, “Règles générales du droit de la paix,” Rec. 35 (1931, I), p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cleveringa, “Het Nieuwe Zeerecht.” 3 See p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spaight, “Aircraft in Peace and the Law,” p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lemoine, “Traité de Droit Aérien,” pp. 201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karrer, “Die Einflusz der Souveränität im Luftraum auf die Abgrenzung des Privaatrechts,” Aarau, 1938, p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lortsch, Revue de Droit Aérien, Vol. 13, 1929, p. 7. De Visscher, “Les Conflicts de Lois en Matière de Droit Aérien,” Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International à la Haye, 1934, II, p. 352. Coquoz, “Le droit privé international aérien,” p. 291.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hamel, “Nationalité et conflicts de lois du droit aérien,” Revue de droit international privé, 20 (1925), p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See note p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Institut de Droit International, Annuaire 1911, pp. 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., Annuaire 1910, p. 318.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roper, “La Convention Internationale du 13 octobre portant réglementation de la navigation aérienne” (Paris, 1930), pp. 155–157.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Projet de Code International de l’Air du Comité Juridique International de l’Aviation (VI Congrès, Rome 1924), Chapitre VI, De la législation applicable et de la juridiction compétente en matière de locomotion aérienne.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Convention on damage caused by foreign aircraft to third parties on the surface, Rome, 1952, ICAO Doc. 7364.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Couännier, “De la nationalité et du domicile des aéronefs”, Revue Juridique Internationale de la Locomotion Aérienne, 1910, p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  16. International Law Association, Report of the Thirty-First Conference, Buenos Aires, 1922, p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., Report of the Thirty-third Conference, Stockholm, 1924, pp. 113 et. seq.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Law Association, Report of the Thirty-first Conference, Buenos Aires, 1922, p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  21. International Law Association, Report of the Forty-fourth Conference, Copenhagen, 1950, pp. 226 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  22. International Law Association, Report of the Forty-fifth Conference, Lucerne, 1952, pp. 113–138.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., p. 116. 2 Ibid., p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid., p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ratified by the Netherlands on April 6, 1933 (Statute Book 149) and published by Royal Decree of July 7, 1933 (Statute Book No. 365).

    Google Scholar 

  27. The Convention has been ratified by forty six States.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Article 18 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Article 19 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Article 20 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  32. If the Protocol for Revision of the Warsaw Convention (The Hague, September 1955) is ratified, this amount will be increased to 250,000 gold francs (62.000 guilders).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Article 22 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929. 3 Article 25 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929. 4 Article 28 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Convention on damage caused by foreign aircraft to third parties on the surface Rome, 1952, ICAO Doc. 7364.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Belgium, Rumania, Guatemala, Brazil, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Egypt, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Article 1 of the Rome Convention of 1952. 2 500,000 francs for aircraft weighing 1,000 kilogrammes or less; 500,000 francs plus 400 francs per kilogramme over 1,000 kilogrammes for aircraft weighing more than 1,000 but not exceeding 6,000 kilogrammes; 2,500,000 francs plus 250 francs per kilogramme over 6,000 kilogrammes for aircraft weighing more than 6,000 but not exceeding 20,000 kilogrammes; 6,000,000 francs plus 150 francs per kilogramme over 20,000 kilogrammes for aircraft weighing more than 20,000 but not exceeding 50,000 kilogrammes; 10,500,000 francs plus 100 francs per kilogramme over 50,000 kilogrammes for aircraft weighing more than 50,000 kilogrammes. The francs mentioned here are “gold francs” consisting of 65 milligrammes of gold of millesimal fineness 900. Converted into Dutch currency, the present value of one gold franc is approximately 0,25 guilder.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Expressed in Dutch guilders the limit of liability for certain widely used types of aircraft is as follows: Dakota 1,000,000 guilders Dakota 1,000,000 guilders

    Google Scholar 

  39. Expressed in Dutch guilders the limit of liability for certain widely used types of aircraft is as follows: Dakota 1,000,000 guilders Convair 240 1,500,000 guilders

    Google Scholar 

  40. Expressed in Dutch guilders the limit of liability for certain widely used types of aircraft is as follows: Dakota 1,000,000 guilders Constellation 2,600,000 guilders

    Google Scholar 

  41. Expressed in Dutch guilders the limit of liability for certain widely used types of aircraft is as follows: Dakota 1,000,000 guilders Super Constellation 3,000,000 guilders

    Google Scholar 

  42. ICAO Doc. 6029-LC/126, p.32.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Article 20 of the Rome Convention of 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Convention for the unification of certain rules relating to the precautionary arrest of aircraft, Rome, May 29, 1933 (published by Royal Decree of Feb. 7, 1938, Statute Book No. 12). This Convention came into force for the Netherlands on April 28, 1938, after the Dutch legislation had been adopted to it by the Act of November 4, 1937 (Statute Book No. 207) through addition of the seventh section a) to the IVth Title of Book III of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure. Convention on damage caused by foreign aircraft to third parties on the surface, Rome, May 29, 1933. This Convention has never been ratified by the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  45. CITEJA Document 239, 1934. 298, 1936. 334, 1937. 362, 1938. 487, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  46. CITEJA Document 239, 1934. 293, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Drion, “Towards a uniform interpretation of the private air law conventions,” Journal of Air Law and Commerce, Vol. 19, Autumn 1952, No. 4, pp. 426–427.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Proposal of E. Roguin and A. Darras for the Institute of International Law in 1895 and 1897, Annuaire 1895 and 1897 (XVI), 106, 108. Proposal of Prof, de la Pradelle for the 38th Conference of the International Law Association in 1934 at Budapest, Report of the 38th Conference, pp. 71–75. Carabiber, “Les juridictions internationales de droit privé,” Neuchatel, 1947, pp. 265–279. Gidel, Report to the Institute of International Law, “La Clause Juridictionelle dans les Conventions d’Union notamment celles relatives à la Propriété Industrielle et à la Propriété Artistique et Littéraire,” 39 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, Brussels, 1936, p. 248. Charlier in Compte Rendu des Réunions de la 1ère Commission du CITEJA, Paris, janvier 1946, Doc. No. 487.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Prof. R. P. Cleveringa, proposal to set up an international court of arbitration in the field of maritime and air law, submitted to the 2nd Conference of the International Bar Association at The Hague in 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  50. See p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Proposal of Prof. P. Chauveau for the conference of the International Law Association at Dubrovnik in 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Dutch Statute Book 1935, No. 444. The Protocol was ratified by Belgium, the Netherlands, Esthonia, Portugal, Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  53. ICAO Doc. 7379-LC/34, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  54. See p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  55. ICAO Doc. 7379-LC/24, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Article 84 of the Chicago Convention of 1944, reading as follows: “If any disagreement between two or more contracting States relating to the interpretation or application of this Convention and its Annexes cannot be settled by negotiation, it shall, on the application of any State concerned in the disagreement, be decided by the Council. No member of the Council shall vote in the consideration by the Council of any dispute to which it is a party. Any contracting State may, subject to Article 85, appeal from the decision of the Council to an ad hoc arbitral tribunal agreed upon with the other parties to the dispute or to the Permanent Court of International Justice. Any such appeal shall be notified to the Council within sixty days of receipt of notification of the decision of the Council. 2 Goedhuis, Pacta sunt servanda,” 1952, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lemoine, “Traité de Droit Aérien,” p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Institut de Droit International, Annuaire 1910, p. 318. 3 See page 107.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lemoine, “Traité de Droit Aérien,” p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Projet de Code International de l’Air du Comité Juridique International de l’Aviation, Art. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Goldstein, “La nouvelle législation aérienne belge,” Revue Française de Droit Aérien, avril-juin 1954, p. 115. Litvine, “Précis Elémentaire de Droit Aérien,” Bruxelles, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  62. McNair, “The Law of the Air,” 1953, p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Shawcross and Beaumont on Air Law, 1951, p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Dicey, “Conflict of Laws” (6th ed., 1949, under the general editorship of J. H. C. Morris).

    Google Scholar 

  65. McNair, “The Law of the Air,” 1953, p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ibid., p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  67. In Godfrey’s Case, 1625 (Latch 11; 82 English Reports 249), the Court of Kings’ Bench confirmed that the Admiralty Court has jurisdiction over contracts made at sea.

    Google Scholar 

  68. McNair, “The Law of the Air”, 1953, p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Cleveringa, Int. Bar. Ass., 2nd Conference of the legal profession at The Hague, Aug. 16–21, 1948, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1956 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Honig, J.P. (1956). Civil Jurisdiction over Aircraft. In: The Legal Status of Aircraft. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0987-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0987-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0391-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0987-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics