Abstract
In the previous chapters we have seen that the air space above the territory of a particular State is subject to the sovereignty of that State, that the aircraft possesses a nationality and that it must be regarded as movable property sui generis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
De Bustamante, “Droit International Public,” III, p. 158. 2 McNair, “The Law of the Air,” p. 109.
Bourquin, “Règles générales du droit de la paix,” Rec. 35 (1931, I), p. 128.
Cleveringa, “Het Nieuwe Zeerecht.” 3 See p. 56.
Spaight, “Aircraft in Peace and the Law,” p. 17.
Lemoine, “Traité de Droit Aérien,” pp. 201–207.
Karrer, “Die Einflusz der Souveränität im Luftraum auf die Abgrenzung des Privaatrechts,” Aarau, 1938, p. 92.
Lortsch, Revue de Droit Aérien, Vol. 13, 1929, p. 7. De Visscher, “Les Conflicts de Lois en Matière de Droit Aérien,” Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International à la Haye, 1934, II, p. 352. Coquoz, “Le droit privé international aérien,” p. 291.
Hamel, “Nationalité et conflicts de lois du droit aérien,” Revue de droit international privé, 20 (1925), p. 211.
See note p. 11.
Institut de Droit International, Annuaire 1911, pp. 105–122.
Ibid., Annuaire 1910, p. 318.
Roper, “La Convention Internationale du 13 octobre portant réglementation de la navigation aérienne” (Paris, 1930), pp. 155–157.
Projet de Code International de l’Air du Comité Juridique International de l’Aviation (VI Congrès, Rome 1924), Chapitre VI, De la législation applicable et de la juridiction compétente en matière de locomotion aérienne.
Convention on damage caused by foreign aircraft to third parties on the surface, Rome, 1952, ICAO Doc. 7364.
Couännier, “De la nationalité et du domicile des aéronefs”, Revue Juridique Internationale de la Locomotion Aérienne, 1910, p. 165.
International Law Association, Report of the Thirty-First Conference, Buenos Aires, 1922, p. 211.
Ibid., Report of the Thirty-third Conference, Stockholm, 1924, pp. 113 et. seq.
See p. 109.
International Law Association, Report of the Thirty-first Conference, Buenos Aires, 1922, p. 212.
See p. 108.
International Law Association, Report of the Forty-fourth Conference, Copenhagen, 1950, pp. 226 et seq.
International Law Association, Report of the Forty-fifth Conference, Lucerne, 1952, pp. 113–138.
Ibid., p. 114.
Ibid., p. 116. 2 Ibid., p. 117.
Ibid., p. 109.
Ratified by the Netherlands on April 6, 1933 (Statute Book 149) and published by Royal Decree of July 7, 1933 (Statute Book No. 365).
The Convention has been ratified by forty six States.
Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929.
Article 18 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929.
Article 19 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929.
Article 20 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929.
If the Protocol for Revision of the Warsaw Convention (The Hague, September 1955) is ratified, this amount will be increased to 250,000 gold francs (62.000 guilders).
Article 22 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929. 3 Article 25 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929. 4 Article 28 of the Warsaw Convention of 1929.
Convention on damage caused by foreign aircraft to third parties on the surface Rome, 1952, ICAO Doc. 7364.
Belgium, Rumania, Guatemala, Brazil, Spain.
Egypt, Canada.
Article 1 of the Rome Convention of 1952. 2 500,000 francs for aircraft weighing 1,000 kilogrammes or less; 500,000 francs plus 400 francs per kilogramme over 1,000 kilogrammes for aircraft weighing more than 1,000 but not exceeding 6,000 kilogrammes; 2,500,000 francs plus 250 francs per kilogramme over 6,000 kilogrammes for aircraft weighing more than 6,000 but not exceeding 20,000 kilogrammes; 6,000,000 francs plus 150 francs per kilogramme over 20,000 kilogrammes for aircraft weighing more than 20,000 but not exceeding 50,000 kilogrammes; 10,500,000 francs plus 100 francs per kilogramme over 50,000 kilogrammes for aircraft weighing more than 50,000 kilogrammes. The francs mentioned here are “gold francs” consisting of 65 milligrammes of gold of millesimal fineness 900. Converted into Dutch currency, the present value of one gold franc is approximately 0,25 guilder.
Expressed in Dutch guilders the limit of liability for certain widely used types of aircraft is as follows: Dakota 1,000,000 guilders Dakota 1,000,000 guilders
Expressed in Dutch guilders the limit of liability for certain widely used types of aircraft is as follows: Dakota 1,000,000 guilders Convair 240 1,500,000 guilders
Expressed in Dutch guilders the limit of liability for certain widely used types of aircraft is as follows: Dakota 1,000,000 guilders Constellation 2,600,000 guilders
Expressed in Dutch guilders the limit of liability for certain widely used types of aircraft is as follows: Dakota 1,000,000 guilders Super Constellation 3,000,000 guilders
ICAO Doc. 6029-LC/126, p.32.
Article 20 of the Rome Convention of 1952.
Convention for the unification of certain rules relating to the precautionary arrest of aircraft, Rome, May 29, 1933 (published by Royal Decree of Feb. 7, 1938, Statute Book No. 12). This Convention came into force for the Netherlands on April 28, 1938, after the Dutch legislation had been adopted to it by the Act of November 4, 1937 (Statute Book No. 207) through addition of the seventh section a) to the IVth Title of Book III of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure. Convention on damage caused by foreign aircraft to third parties on the surface, Rome, May 29, 1933. This Convention has never been ratified by the Netherlands.
CITEJA Document 239, 1934. 298, 1936. 334, 1937. 362, 1938. 487, 1946.
CITEJA Document 239, 1934. 293, 1936.
Drion, “Towards a uniform interpretation of the private air law conventions,” Journal of Air Law and Commerce, Vol. 19, Autumn 1952, No. 4, pp. 426–427.
Proposal of E. Roguin and A. Darras for the Institute of International Law in 1895 and 1897, Annuaire 1895 and 1897 (XVI), 106, 108. Proposal of Prof, de la Pradelle for the 38th Conference of the International Law Association in 1934 at Budapest, Report of the 38th Conference, pp. 71–75. Carabiber, “Les juridictions internationales de droit privé,” Neuchatel, 1947, pp. 265–279. Gidel, Report to the Institute of International Law, “La Clause Juridictionelle dans les Conventions d’Union notamment celles relatives à la Propriété Industrielle et à la Propriété Artistique et Littéraire,” 39 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, Brussels, 1936, p. 248. Charlier in Compte Rendu des Réunions de la 1ère Commission du CITEJA, Paris, janvier 1946, Doc. No. 487.
Prof. R. P. Cleveringa, proposal to set up an international court of arbitration in the field of maritime and air law, submitted to the 2nd Conference of the International Bar Association at The Hague in 1948.
See p. 121.
Proposal of Prof. P. Chauveau for the conference of the International Law Association at Dubrovnik in 1956.
Dutch Statute Book 1935, No. 444. The Protocol was ratified by Belgium, the Netherlands, Esthonia, Portugal, Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland.
ICAO Doc. 7379-LC/34, p. 56.
See p. 121.
ICAO Doc. 7379-LC/24, p. 56.
Article 84 of the Chicago Convention of 1944, reading as follows: “If any disagreement between two or more contracting States relating to the interpretation or application of this Convention and its Annexes cannot be settled by negotiation, it shall, on the application of any State concerned in the disagreement, be decided by the Council. No member of the Council shall vote in the consideration by the Council of any dispute to which it is a party. Any contracting State may, subject to Article 85, appeal from the decision of the Council to an ad hoc arbitral tribunal agreed upon with the other parties to the dispute or to the Permanent Court of International Justice. Any such appeal shall be notified to the Council within sixty days of receipt of notification of the decision of the Council. 2 Goedhuis, Pacta sunt servanda,” 1952, p. 20.
Lemoine, “Traité de Droit Aérien,” p. 206.
Institut de Droit International, Annuaire 1910, p. 318. 3 See page 107.
Lemoine, “Traité de Droit Aérien,” p. 201.
Projet de Code International de l’Air du Comité Juridique International de l’Aviation, Art. 30.
Goldstein, “La nouvelle législation aérienne belge,” Revue Française de Droit Aérien, avril-juin 1954, p. 115. Litvine, “Précis Elémentaire de Droit Aérien,” Bruxelles, 1953.
McNair, “The Law of the Air,” 1953, p. 122.
Shawcross and Beaumont on Air Law, 1951, p. 80.
Dicey, “Conflict of Laws” (6th ed., 1949, under the general editorship of J. H. C. Morris).
McNair, “The Law of the Air,” 1953, p. 127.
Ibid., p. 136.
In Godfrey’s Case, 1625 (Latch 11; 82 English Reports 249), the Court of Kings’ Bench confirmed that the Admiralty Court has jurisdiction over contracts made at sea.
McNair, “The Law of the Air”, 1953, p. 145.
Cleveringa, Int. Bar. Ass., 2nd Conference of the legal profession at The Hague, Aug. 16–21, 1948, p. 5.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1956 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Honig, J.P. (1956). Civil Jurisdiction over Aircraft. In: The Legal Status of Aircraft. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0987-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0987-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0391-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0987-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive