Skip to main content
  • 55 Accesses

Abstract

It is easily understandable that Emilia Galotti should be the one German work which perhaps more than any other was to exert the greatest influence on the Sturm and Drang dramatists, whose interest in the relation of the individual to society and of feeling to reason made them particularly susceptible to Lessing’s play.1 The reason for the popularity of Emilia Galotti among these authors is, of course, due to the fact that it was more or less a wellspring for some of the main themes of Storm and Stress drama.2 Of these themes, mention may be made here of the struggle for political freedom and for individual freedom within society. Especially important are the moral problems of marriage between members of different social classes, of the woman “caught” between two men, of seduction, of freethinking in matters of love and marriage, and of such closely associated ramifications as abduction, bigamy, suicide, and infanticide.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. For a detailed survey of this subject, see Joseph Zorn, Die Motive der Sturm-und Drangdramatiker,eine Untersuchung ihrer Herkunft und Entwicklung (Diss. Bonn, 1909). Cf. also p. 66, footnote 2 below.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walther Hilpert, J. G. Hamann als Kritiker der deutschen Literatur ( Diss. Königsberg, 1933 ), p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Letter of April 3, 1772, to Heyne. See Robert T. Clark, Jr., Herder — His Life and Thought (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1955), p. 186. Concerning the “newness” of the play, see Chapter VI, p. 83, footnote 3 below.

    Google Scholar 

  4. From Herders Sämmtliche Werke,hg. Bernhard Suphan (Berlin, 1881), XVII, 283. Cf.: “Es ist sein Stand nur, der ihn zum Verbrecher macht” in Elise Dosenheimer, Das deutsche soziale Drama von Lessing bis Sternheim (Konstanz: Südverlag, 1949), P. 24. Cf. also Milliner’s comments, Chaqter V below.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. Lessing’s letter of April 22, 1772, to Nicolai (LM, XVIII, 35 f.), in which he says that an actress can perform “too excellently.”

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. a similar comment in Anton Matthias Sprickmann’s Eulalia (Leipzig, 1777), II, 6, a tragedy labeled a copy of Emilia Galotti by the Berlinisches Litterarisches Wochenblatt; it was published anonymously.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Between Karoline’s last letter and Herder’s reply, Goethe had written his famous letter of ca. July 10, 1772, to Herder. See Chapter IV below for a more detailed discussion of this letter.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aus Herders Nachlaß,III, 301 f., letter of mid-July, 1772. No exact date given. It is interesting to note that in the same letter, Herder refers to Goethe’s Götz as “gedacht” in places, once again possibly quoting from Goethe’s letter. However, Barker Fairley states that “evidently Herder had already expressed himself in similar terms, perhaps more sweepingly, to Goethe” and that “the comparison of Götz with Emilia Galotti in point of intellectuality is Herder’s; Goethe is presumably echoing it” in Goethe-Selected Letters (1770–86) (Oxford,1949), p. ‘53. The fact that Herder’s letter to Goethe is lacking prevents anything more than speculation in this matter.

    Google Scholar 

  9. In the case of Leisewitz, for example, see Walther Kühlhorn, Julius von Tarent,Erläuterungen und literarhistorische Würdigung (Diss. Halle-Wittenberg, 1911), esp. pp. 63 ff. Although there are some interesting remarks about Emilia Galotti in Lenz’ collected works, they were actually written by J. Georg Schlosser, Goethe’s brother-in-law, in an attempt to hearten Lenz after the discouraging reception of his comedy, Der neue Menoza. These comments, found in the work entitled Prinz Tandi an den Verfasser des neuen Menoza,treat Emilia’s “improbable” death. As he indicates, it is not particularly rare for a father to kill his daughter; the improbability of the matter rests on the fact that the weak and inactive Prince, wavering between virtue and vice, never presented a real danger to the girl. See Jakob Michael Reinhold Lenz, Gesammelte Schriften,hg. Franz Blei (München und Leipzig, 1909), II, 474 and 481 f.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1963 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dvoretzky, E. (1963). Storm and Stress. In: The Enigma of Emilia Galotti. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0949-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0949-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0372-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0949-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics