Abstract
State responsibility for the protection of aliens—not to mention diplomats—arises both directly (through its own acts) and indirectly (through the acts of others). As in the fundamentalist view of sin, these acts may be considered as either positive, in the sense of acts of commission, or negative, as in acts of omission. Thus, Brierly maintains that “...a state incurs no responsibility for an injury suffered by an alien unless some fault either of commission or omission can be attributed to itself.”1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brierly, J. L., The Law of Nations (6th Ed.), p. 289. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, 1963. (Italics added.)
Eagleton, Clyde, The Responsibility of States in International Law, p. 79. N.Y. University Press, New York, 1928.
Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (2nd Edition), p. 199. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc., 1966.
Borchard, Edwin M.,The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad, p. 213. The Banks Law Publishing Co., New York, 1915.
Eagleton, Clyde, International Government (3rd Edition), p. 127. The Ronald Press Co., New York, 1957. Nonetheless, if the situation is beyond the control of “usually adequate forces,” the state cannot be held liable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baumann, C.E. (1973). Problems of Protection and Security. In: The Diplomatic Kidnappings. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0937-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0937-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0366-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0937-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive