Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Scholars Forum ((ISFO,volume 15))

  • 53 Accesses

Abstract

The period from December 1935 until June 1936, was really one of transition for the membership of the Friends of New Germany since, in that period, a new national leader was selected, and the name of the organization — so publicized by the Congressional investigation — was changed to the German-American Bund. The next few years were to be the most controversial and climactic in the short history of National Socialism in America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kuhn was, throughout the life of the Bund, a controversial figure, and much was written about him He was born in Munich in 1896, served in World War I, as a lieutenant in the German army, and like many of the early Hitler followers, left Germany after the break-up of the Party in 1923. Kuhn emigrated to the United States via Mexico, in 1924, and turned up later in Detroit as a chemist for the Ford Motor Co.

    Google Scholar 

  2. This is the opinion of Austin G. Chambers in an unplublished master’s thesis, “The German-American Bund and German-American Diplomatic Relations, 1936–194.1” (Stanford University, 1961), p. 8. In German literature during the Hitler era Germans living in America were always referred to as “Amerikadeutsche” and as formerly, “Deutschamerikaner.” Paechter, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  3. German Records, 3/141/0I 79046.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Bund had the Deutscher Weckruf and Beobachter in Chicago, Philadelphia, and California as well as the New York paper edited by Kappe, and later Severin Winterscheidt after Kappe left for Germany in the summer of 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  5. German Records, 25/394/5135808–5135823. The Bund also received material from the Weltdienst or World Service, a propaganda agency located at first in Erfurt and later Frankfurt a.M., and subsidized by the government. The head was a retired army officer named Ulrich Fleischhauer.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., 5135820. The U.S. Nazis had a longstanding feud with the Ridder family and the New York Staats zeitung, dating back to actual attempts to put pressure on the paper to fall into line with the National Socialist propaganda.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The American Ambassador to Germany, Dodd, wrote that he was quite sure Kuhn was a representative of “Bohle of the Foreign Office of the Nazi Party.” Ambassador Dodd’s Diary, p. 340. An American government agent wrote: “The Nazi organization for America starts in Germany with Ernst Bohle and his Auslands bureau.” Richard Rollins, I Find Treason ( New York: William Morrow and Co., 1941 ), p. 204.

    Google Scholar 

  8. I.M.T., Vol. X, p. 41. Bohle, when questioned on this subject at Nuremberg, denied all connection with the Bund. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Doc. on Ger. For. Pol., Ser. D, Vol. 1, pp. 632–633.

    Google Scholar 

  10. It is not likely that just Gilbert’s action alone precipitated a whole reappraisal of German policy toward the Bund as one researcher has claimed. Joachim Remak “`Friends of New Germany’: The Bund and German-American Relations,” The Journal of Modern History, XXIX (March, 1957 ), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Doc. on Ger. For. Pol., Ser. D., Vol. 1, pp. 636–637.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., 5301157–5301159. Most of these reports were dated around March, April and May of 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., 5301177. An earlier comment by German Consul Borchers seemed closer to the truth when he wrote the Foreign Office: “Germany has, in the Bund, fashioned herself a tool which, by adopting all National Socialist views but cleverly cloaking its aims, has taken upon itself the task of destroying the United States from within by awakening dormant racial feelings and promoting those which are already more or less active. This attitude has, as a result of years of propaganda, mistakes of the Bund, and perhaps also, occasionally, as a result of misunderstandings on the part of Reich Germans, today become a deep-rooted conviction with the overwhelming majority of Americans.” Doc. on Ger. For. Pol., Ser. D, Vol. IV, p. 677.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1965 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, A.L. (1965). The Dai and the German-American Bund. In: The Deutschtum of Nazi Germany and the United States. International Scholars Forum, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0931-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0931-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0363-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0931-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics