Advertisement

Fresh Lineaments of the Natural Law

  • Michael Bertram Crowe

Abstract

The stage has now been set for the closer delineation of the natural law, the result of the efforts of the great scholastic theologians working on the rich material they found in the tradition. The elements in that tradition, as has been seen, were basically three: (1) a conception of the natural law, originally Stoic with a background in the pre-Socratics, Plato and Aristotle, translated into the Roman world, popularized by Cicero and finding its authoritative expression in the Roman law; (2) a conception of the natural law, complementing the preceding one, but tributary to St. Paul and the elaboration of his thought by the Fathers and ecclesiastical writers; and (3) the radical re-shaping of the Christian natural law in its identification, by Gratian and his followers, with what is found in the law and the gospel. The future history of the concept of natural law will be determined by the weaving together of these strands in the special environment of scholastic philosophy and theology. It is part of the thesis of this book that the profile that resulted in the work of St. Thomas Aquinas gets as close as is humanly possible to the natural law and that it has hardly been improved upon by his successors. To see this achievment in its context, we must first look-of necessity briefly and selectively — at some of his immediate forerunners.

Keywords

Thirteenth Century Twelfth Century Nicomachean Ethic Practical Syllogism Lower Reason 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 9.
    Expos. in Ep. Pauli ad Rom., I (P. L., 178; 814, 862); Dialogus inter philosophum Judaeum et Christianum, (P. L., 178; 1656); F. De Siano, “Of God and Man: Consequences of Abelard’s Ethic” in The Thomist, 35 (1971), pp. 639, 652-654.Google Scholar
  2. 11.
    F. Pelster, “Wann hat Petrus Lombardus die Libri IV Sententiarum vollen-det?” in Gregorianum 2 (1921), pp. 387–392Google Scholar
  3. D. Van den Eynde, “Nouvelles precisions chronologiques sur quelques oeuvres théologiques au XIIe siècle” in Franciscan Studies 13 (1953), pp. 71–118.Google Scholar
  4. 14.
    A.H. Chroust, “The Philosophy of Law from St. Augustine to St. Thomas Aquinas” in The New Scholasticism, 20 (1946), p. 39.Google Scholar
  5. 22.
    V. Doucet, Prolegomena in librum III necnon in libros I et II in Summa Fratris Alexandri (Quaracchi), t. 4, pp. CCCLXIX CCCVII; cf. also I. Brady, Law in the “Summa fratris Alexandri” in Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 24 (1950), pp. 133–136Google Scholar
  6. F. Henquinet, “Ist der Traktat de legibus et praeceptis in der Summa Alexanders von Hales von Johannes von Rupella?” in Franziskanische Studien, 26 (1939), pp. 1–22, 234-258.Google Scholar
  7. 25.
    J.F. Quinn, “St. Bonaventure’s Fundamental Conception of Natural Law” in S. Bonaventura 1274–1974. III, p. 572.Google Scholar
  8. 30.
    Summa de bono, Tractatus V, De iustitia, q. 1, a. 1 (Opera Omnia, XXVIII, Münster, 1951, pp. 265–6): “Non enim consentimus in distinctionem quam quidem posuerunt, scilicet quod ius naturale multis modis dicatur, et uno modo sit commune nobis cum brutis.”Google Scholar
  9. 34.
    Cf. the passage quoted in G. Fassò, La legge della ragione, Appendice 19-20, pp. 268-269; G. Meersseman, “Le droit naturel chez S. Thomas d’Aquin et ses prédécesseurs” in Angelicum, 9 (1932), pp. 63–65.Google Scholar
  10. 37.
    I may be permitted to refer to my study: M.B. Crowe, “The Term synderesis and the Scholastics” in Irish Theological Quarterly, 23 (1956), pp. 151–164, 228-245.Google Scholar
  11. 43.
    F. Nitzsch, “Uber die Entstehung der scholastischen Lehre von der Synderesis-ein historischer Beitrag zur Lehre vom Gewissen” in Jahrbüch für protestantische Theologie, 5 (1879), pp. 492–507. For other references to nineteenth century literature see M. B. Crowe, op. cit., pp. 153-154.Google Scholar
  12. 44.
    R. Leiber, “Name und Begriff der Synteresis” in Philosophisches Jahrbuch, 25 (1912), pp. 372–392Google Scholar
  13. J. Hebing, “Über conscientia und conservatio im philosophischen Sinne bei Römern von Cicero bis Hieronymus,” ibid., 35 (1922), pp. 121–135, 215-231, 298-326Google Scholar
  14. K. Schmeider, “Die Synderesis und die ethischen Werte,” ibid., 47 (1943), pp. 145–159, 297-307Google Scholar
  15. M. Waldmann, “Synteresis oder Syneidesis — ein Beitrag zur Lehre vom Gewissen” in Theologisches Quartalschrift, 119 (1938), pp. 332–371; J. de Blic, op. cit. Google Scholar
  16. 45.
    H. Stephanus, Thesaurus linguae graecae, t. 7, 1472, 1290–1291.Google Scholar
  17. 48.
    J. de Blic, “L’oeuvre exégétique de Walafrid Strabon à la Glossa Ordinaria,” in Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale, 16 (1949), pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
  18. 49.
    J. de Blic, “Conscience ou synderese?” in Revue d’ascétique et de mystique, 25 (1949), p. 155.Google Scholar
  19. 53.
    R.W. Mulligan, “Ratio superior and ratio inferior — the Historical Background” in The New Scholasticism, 29 (1955), pp. 5–14.Google Scholar
  20. 60.
    H. Wilms, “De scintilla animae” in Angelicum 14 (1937), pp. 194–211; cf.Google Scholar
  21. M. Grabmann, “Die Lehre des hl. Thomas von der scintilla animae in ihrer Bedeutung für die deutsche Mystik im Predigerorden” in Jahrbuch für Philosophie und spekulative Theologie, 14 (1900), pp. 413–427.Google Scholar
  22. 69.
    In 2 Sent., d. 39, a. 1, q. 2 (ed. Quaracchi, t. 2, pp. 901-904); J.F. Quinn, “St. Bonaventure’s Fundamental Conception of Natural Law” in S. Bonaventura 1274–1974, III, pp. 572–580.Google Scholar
  23. 76.
    Cf. F.M. Henquinet, “Vingt-deux questions inédites d’Albert le Grand dans un manuscript à l’usage de S. Thomas d’Aquin” in The New Scholasticism, 9 (1935), pp. 312–322; Albert, Summa theologiae, II, tr. 16, q. 99, m. 3, a. 2, q. 1: Utrum conscientia sit eadem quod lex naturalis; Id. q. 2: Utrum conscientia sit semper in actu vel aliquando in habitu (Opera omnia, ed. Borgnet, t. 33, p. 244).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Bertram Crowe
    • 1
  1. 1.University CollegeDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations