Skip to main content
  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

One other category of officials merits brief attention before our discussion turns to the special executive agent, the subject of concern in this study. This is a broad, rather amorphous category which includes those sent to attend ad hoc international conferences, delegates and officers of regular international organizations, judges of international courts and members of special technical commissions representing states and public international organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clyde Eagleton, “The Responsability of the State for the Protection of Foreign Officials,” American Journal of International Law, XIX (1925), 312.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hyde, op. cit., I, 719–720.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oppenheim, op. cit., 8th ed., I, 775.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Loewe und Rosenberg, Die Strafprozessordnung und das Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz (20th ed.; 1956), II, 73.

    Google Scholar 

  5. С Van Vollenhoven, “Diplomatic Prerogatives of Non-Diplomats,” American Journal of International Law, XIX (1925), 473.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sir Neville Bland, correspondence, August 5, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diplomatic Privileges (Extension) Act, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kunz, op. cit., p. 854.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. 828.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., pp. 828–829; Lawrence Preuss, “Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities of Agents Invested with Functions of an International Interest,” American Journal of International Law, XXV (1931), 696–697.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hyde, op. cit., 2nd ed., II, 1232–33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Preuss, op. cit., p. 699.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hackworth, Digest, op. cit., IV, 419–23; Kunz, op. cit., pp. 829–30.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., p. 861.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid., pp. 832–35.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Article 19.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kunz, op. cit., pp. 852–53, 856.

    Google Scholar 

  18. United Nations General Assembly, First Session, Document a/43, Annex 22.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Public Law 291, 79th Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 14 Geo. 6, Ch. 14, Schedule, Part II.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Revised Statutes of Canada, 1952, IV, chapter ccxix, Article IV, 4433.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., Articles V and VI, pp. 4434–4435.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kunz, op. cit., pp. 853–54.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid., p. 854.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Preuss, op. cit., p. 694.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid., p. 695. See also Van Vollenhoven, op. cit., p. 473.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kunz, op. cit., p. 856.

    Google Scholar 

  30. United Nations Journal, N0. 54, Supplement A-A/P, I. (December 9, 1946), as cited ibid., p. 859.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kunz, op. cit., p. 854.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Moore, Digest, op. cit., IV, Sec. 623, cited in Clyde Eagleton, “The Responsibility of the State for the Protection of Foreign Officials,” American Journal of International Law, XIX (April, 1925), 303.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Foster, op. cit., pp. 194–95.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Eagleton, op. cit., p. 303.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ibid., p. 307.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hall, op. cit., p. 371. Van Vollenhoven is also of this opinion, op. cit., p. 473.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hyde, op. cit.,, ist ed., I, 719. ? Mr. Foster, Secretary of State, to Mr. Heard, No. 151, Diplomatic Series, October 31, 1892, MS Instructions Korea, I, 414, as cited in Moore, Digest, op. cit., IV, 440.

    Google Scholar 

  40. MS Department of State, file 701.0611/79, as cited in Hackworth, Digest, op. cit., IV, 420–421.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Amos S. Hershey, Essentials of International Public Law and Organization (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1927), pp. 411–12.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hyde, op. cit., ist ed., I, 722.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Satow, op. cit., I, 174.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Harvard Law School, op. cit., p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1963 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waters, M. (1963). Status of Miscellaneous Agents under International Law. In: The Ad Hoc Diplomat: A Study in Municipal and International Law. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0897-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0897-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0346-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0897-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics