Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 85 Accesses

Abstract

It is interesting and somewhat paradoxical to note that the American people have engaged in many long and heated controversies over the question of whether the United States should or should not be actively involved in international affairs, apparently without most of them ever realizing that it has been so involved throughout much of its history. This participation has necessarily put the President, his advisors and agents into positions of great importance, and has made them a subject of much attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Max Farrand, ed., The Records of the Federal Convention, (New Haven: Yale University-Press, 1911), I, 291. He suggested the President should have the power to make treaties and appointments, but most of his speech was devoted to other problems of government.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., II, 389, 394, 419, 540.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., I, 164–65.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Joseph P. Harris, The Advice and Consent of the Senate, A Study of the Confirmation of Appointments of the United States Senate, (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1953), P. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Farrand, op. cit., I, 164–65.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harris, op. cit., p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Federalist, Nos. 76 and 77 (New York: The Modem Library, 1941).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blatch 451, 454 (1860).

    Google Scholar 

  10. U.S. v. Curtis Wright Export Corporation, 299 U.S. 304.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Official Opinions of the Attorneys-General of the United States, VII, 215, 217.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Statutes at Large, I, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Congressional Record, 59th Cong., ist Sess., XL, 1420.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Statutes at Large, I, 128, 299. The statute provides that “... the President shall account specifically for all such expenditures of the said money as in his judgment may be made public, and also for the amount of such expenditures as he may think it advisable not to specify ...”, pp. 128–129.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Henry M. Wriston, Executive Agents in American Foreign Relations (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1929), pp. 118–19.

    Google Scholar 

  16. American State Papers, Documents, Legislative and Executive, of the Congress of the U.S., “Foreign Relations,” I, 184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1963 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waters, M. (1963). Introduction. In: The Ad Hoc Diplomat: A Study in Municipal and International Law. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0897-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0897-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0346-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0897-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics