Skip to main content

Nomic Statements (I): Scientific Laws

  • Chapter
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

Statements are the basic linguistic means for expressing knowledge. Yet, strictly speaking there are genuine statements which seem to tell us nothing about the world or, for that matter, about any subject-matter at all, including their own. Such statements necessarily assume a very limited role in systematic discourse. They cannot, for example, serve as relevant premises in any factual inference. Nor can they serve, as nomic statements, to express any law of nature. Nevertheless, their function in the systemization of knowledge is an important one and is closely tied to the crucial role of logical inference in all systematic discourse. To see how this is so, let us review some basic matters about statements in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. M. White in S. Hook (ed.), John Dewey: Philosophy of Science and Freedom. New York, 1950, pp. 316–330.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Nagel, “Logic Without Ontology” in Naturalism and the Human Spirit, ed. Y. H. Krikorian, New York, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Goodman, Fact Fiction and Forecast, Harvard, 1955, pp. 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. L. Mackie, “Counterfactuals and Causal Laws” in Analytical Philosophy, ed. R. J. Butler, New York, 1962, pp. 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. S. Shankland, Atomic and Nuclear Physics, Macmillan: New York, second edit.. 1960, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1959, pp. 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Halliday and R. Rosnick, Physics,John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1966, pp. 571–615.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cannavo, S. (1974). Nomic Statements (I): Scientific Laws. In: Nomic Inference. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0788-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0788-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0266-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0788-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics