Abstract
Many writers refrain from starting an introductory work with a definition of the subject and do so for good reason. An accurate and concise enough definition at the start of a work would probably have to be too general, abstract or technical to communicate anything of much value to the beginning reader; while one which avoids these features would tend to become so elaborate and burdened with illustrations as to seem redundant, if the main body of the work is to follow anyway. There is indeed a real difficulty here and its source lies deep. For talk about any subject is, in general, not part of that subject. A definition of science would not be science; just as a definition of music would not be music. Even a practicing scientist attempting to write about his subject would soon find himself using language not ordinarily called for when writing in his subject. Thus, in talking about physical theory he might, for example, take up such matters as the general structure of abstract deductive systems, the relation of such systems to physical subject-matter, the nature of scientific models, and much more - topics which have come to be thought of as more properly belonging to semantics, applied logic or, more generally, to the philosophy of science rather than to natural science itself.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
G. Bergmann, Philosophy of Science, The University of Wisconsin Press: Madison, 1957, p. 8.
C. L. Stevenson, Ethics and Language, Yale University Press: New Haven, 1944, p. 21.
D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, Vol. 1, E. P. Dutton: New York, 1911, p. 169.
I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, J. M. D. Meiklejohn translation, Willey Book: New York, 1943, pp. 335–336.
A suggestion along similar lines is briefly made by S. Toulmin in his The Philosophy of Science, Hutchinson’s University Library: London, 1953, p. 15.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cannavo, S. (1974). Analytical Philosophy of Science. In: Nomic Inference. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0788-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0788-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0266-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0788-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive