Advertisement

Intrauterine pregnancy

  • David A. Edelman
  • Gary S. Berger
  • Louis Keith

Abstract

The IUD is intended to prevent pregnancy; nevertheless, pregnancies have occurred with IUDs in situ. In most instances, the reasons for this method failure are unknown.

Keywords

Spontaneous Abortion Spontaneous Abortion Rate Intrauterine Device Intrauterine Pregnancy Complicated Pregnancy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. H. Robins Company, Unpublished data. Richmond, Virginia.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Acosta, A. A.; Mabray, C. R.; and Kaufman, R. H. Intrauterine pregnancy and coexistent pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol. 37:282, 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agnew, H. W.; and Pritchard, J. A. Abortion and bacterial shock induced with an intrauterine contraceptive device. Report of a case. Obstet. Gynecol. 28:332, 1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alvior, G. T. Pregnancy outcome with removal of intrauterine device. Obstet. Gynecol. 41:894, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alza Corporation. The Progestasert. Intrauterine progesterone contraceptive system release rated 65 figl day progesterone for one year. Alza Product Information, Palo Alto, California, 1977.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baker, J. W. Serious complications of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Med. J.Australia 1:1126, 1969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barrie, H. Congenital malformation associated with intrauterine contraceptive device. Br. Med.J.. 1:488, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beck, P.; Birnbaum, S. J.; and Schlossberg, M. Intrauterine contraceptive device failure associated with anomalous full-term delivery. N.Y. State J. Med., June 15:1766, 1967.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biggerstaff, E. D.; Menutti, M. T.; Yetter, J. F.; and Rogers, R. E. Maternal midtrimester sepsis in association with the intrauterine contraceptive device: early histopathologic findings. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 124: 207, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boyd, J. J., and Rawlinson, K. F. Third-trimester uterine sepsis associated with shield-type intrauterine device. Lancet 1:813, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cates, W.; Ory, H. W.; Rochat, R. W.; and Tyler, C. W. The intrauterine device and deaths from spontaneous abortion. N. Engl. J. Med. 295:1155, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cates, W.; Grimes, D. A.; Ory, H. W.; and Tyler, C. W.Publicity and the public health: the elimination of IUD -related abortion deaths. Fam. Plann. Perspec. 9: 138, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Christian, C. D. Maternal deaths associated with an intrauterine device. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 119:441, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Christian, C. D. The morbidity and mortality of mid-trimester sepsis associated with IUD s. In Analysis of intrauterine contraception, eds. F. Hefnawi and S. J. Segal. New York: American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc., 1975.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eisinger, S. H. Second-trimester spontaneous abortion, the IUD , and infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 124: 393, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Family Planning Research Unit. An enquiry into the data base on the Dalkon Shield, Memorandum no. 3. Exeter: The Family Planning Research Unit, University of Exeter, 1977.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gabel, G. H., and Dunn, L. J. A possible new hazard of the intrauterine contraceptive device. Virginia Med. Monthly 102:20, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gawad, A. H. A.; Toppozada, H. K .; Sawi, M. D .; Salleh, F ; and Sahwi, S.E. Study of the environment in association with intrauterine contraceptive devices. Contraception 16:469, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guillebaud, J. IUDand congenital malformation. Br. Med. J. 1:1016, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hall, R. E. A Four Year Report on Loop D. Int. J. Fertil. 13:309, 1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ho, C-Y, and Aterman, K. Infection of the Fetus by Candida in a spontaneous abortion. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 106:705, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hurt, W. G. Septic pregnancy associated with Dalkon Shield intrauterine device. Obstet Gynecol. 44:491, 1974.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    lanniruberto, A., and Mastroberardino, A. Ultrasonic localization of the Lippes Loop. Am. J.Obstet Gynecol 114:78, 1972.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Janssens, D.; Vrijens, M.; Thiery, M.; and Van Kets, H. Ultrasonic detection, localization and identification of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Contraception 8:485, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jewett, J. F. Chorioamnionitis complicated by an intrauterine device (Committee on Maternal Welfare: Massachusetts Medical Society). N. Engl. J. Med. 289: 1251, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jouppila, P. Location of the missing intrauterine contraceptive device. Acta Obstet Gynecol. (Scand) 54:71, 1975.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kahn, H. S., and Tyler, C. W. An association between the Dalkon Shield and complicated pregnancies among women hospitalized for intrauterine contraceptive device-related disorders. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 125:83, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kamal, I.; Ghoneim, M.; Talaat, M.; Abdalla, M.; Eid, M.; and Rawai, E. Pregnancies in the presence of copper intra-uterine devices. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 14:341, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kellogg, S. G.; Davis, C., and Benirschke, K. Candida parapsilosis: previously unknown cause of fetal infection. J. Reprod. Med. 12:159, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Last, P. A. Pregnancy and the intrauterine contraceptive device. Contraception 9:439, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Layde, P. M.; Goldberg, M. F.; Safra, M. J.; and Oakley, G. P. Failed intrauterine device contraception and limb reduction deformities: a case-control study. Fertil. Steril. 31:18, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Leighton, P. C.; Evans, D. G.; and Wallis, S. M. IUDand congenital malformation. Br. Med.J.. 1:959, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Madrigal, V.; Thomas, M. N.; Goldsmith, A.; and Edelman, D. A. A two-year evaluation of the Dalkon Shield intrauterine device in San Salvador. Paper presented at the VII World Congress on Fertility and Sterility, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3–9 November, 1974.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Matthews, J. Dalkon Shield: mid-trimester septic abortion. Med. J.Australia 2:856, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McCracken, J. S. IUDand congenital malformation. JAMA 1:1020, 1976.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Misenhimer, H. R., and Garcia-Bunuel, R. Failure of intrauterine contraceptive device and fungal infection in the fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 34:368, 1969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Monif, G. R. G.; D’Alessandri, R. M.; Khakoo, R. A.; and Kluge, R. M. Fatal sepsis associated with an intrauterine device and pregnancy. South. Med.J.. 70: 249, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mosley, W. H.; Chow, L. P.; and Liu, P. T. IUDrelated hospitalizations. A further analysis of device specific associations in the 1973 CDC study. Unpublished report from the Department of Population Dymanics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 1974.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Neri, A.; Joel-Cohen, J.; and Ovadia, J. Ovarian abscess associated with incomplete abortion and intrauterine contraceptive device. Isr. J.Med. Sci. 13:305, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Propper, N. S., and Moore, J. H. Association of E. coli sepsis in pregnancy with a Cu-7 intrauterine device in place. Obstet. Gynecol 48:76S, 1976 (Supplement).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Randic, L.; Ragab, I.; Thomas, M.; Kessel, E.; and Bernard, R. P. One-year evaluation of the spring coil IUDin Rijeka, Yugoslavia, and Cairo, Egypt. Adv. Plann. Parent. X:73, 1975.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Scott, R. B. Critical illnesses and deaths associated with intrauterine devices. Obstet. Gynecol. 31:322, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sparks, R. A., and Letchworth, A. T. Mid-trimester septic abortion and Escherichia coli septicaemia in a copper IUCD user. Br. Med. J. 1:481, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Steven, J. D., and Fraser, I. S. The outcome of pregnancy after failure of an intrauterine contraceptive device, J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Brit. Comnwlth. 81: 282, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stewart, W. C.; O’Brien, F. B.; Nissen, C.; and Deysach, L. Multiclinic evaluation of Gravigard (Cu 7) intrauterine contraception. In Analysis of intrauterine contraception, eds. F. Hefnawi and S. J. Segal. New York: American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc., 1975.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tatum, H. J.; Schmidt, F. H.; Phillips, D.; McCarty, M.; and O’Leary, W. M. The Dalkon Shield controversy: structural and bacteriological studies of IUDtails. JAMA 231:711, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tatum, H. J.; Schmidt, F. H.; and Jain, A. K. Management and outcome of pregnancies associated with the Copper T intrauterine contraceptive device. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 126:869, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thomas, A. K. Septic abortion associated with a Lippes Loop. Br. Med. J. 3:747, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tietze, C. Contraception with intrauterine devices 1959–1966. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 96:1043, 1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Vessey, M.; Doll, R.; Peto, R.; Johnson, B.; and Wiggins, P. A long-term follow-up study of women using different methods of contraception—an interim report. J. Biosoc. Sci. 8:373, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Viechnicki, M. B. Septicemia and abortion with the Cu-7. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 127:203, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Vujach, J., and Korman, B. Second trimester abortion and the Dalkon Shield. Med. J.Australia 2:249, 1975.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wiles, C. M.; Cohens, S. L.; and Ward, R. H. T. Septic abortion and acute renal failure in a patient with an intra-uterine contraceptive device. Int. J.Gynaecol. Obstet. 15:464, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wiles, P. J., and Zeiderman, A. M. Pregnancy complicated by intrauterine contraceptive devices. Obstet Gynecol. 44:484, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Williams, P.; Johnson, B.; and Vessey, M. Septic abortion in women using intrauterine devices. Br. Med. J. 4:263, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zuckerman, J. E., and Stubblefield, P. G. E. coli septicemia in pregnancy associated with the shield. Am. J.Obstet. Gynecol. 120:951, 1974.55.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Edelman, Berger, and Keith 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Edelman
    • 1
  • Gary S. Berger
    • 2
  • Louis Keith
    • 3
  1. 1.International Fertility Research Program Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology NorthwesternUniversity Medical School and Prentice Women’s Hospital and Maternity Center ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations