Skip to main content

IUD insertion

  • Chapter
  • 63 Accesses

Abstract

IUD complications may occur at the time of insertion and/or at some later time. Complications which affect the ease and safety of IUD insertion may be related to patient selection, choice of IUD, timing of the insertion or inadequate insertion technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. H. Robins Company. Unpublished data. Richmond, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Acker, D.; Boehm, F. H.; Askew, D. E.; and Rothman, H. Electrocardiogram changes with intrauterine contraceptive device insertion. Am. J Obstet. Gynecol. 115:458, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Akinla, O.; Luukkainen, T.; and Timonen, H. Important factors in the use-effectiveness of the Copper-T-200 IUD. Contraception 12:697, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aznar, R.; Reynoso, L.; Ley, E.; Gamez, R.; and De Leon, M.D. Electrocardiographic changes induced by insertion of an intrauterine device and other uterine manipulations. Fertil Steril. 27:93, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Banharnsupawat, L., and Rosenfield, A. G. Immediate postpartum IUD insertion. Obstet. Gynecol. 38:276, 1971.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baveja, R., and Samant, V. Immediate postpartum Lippes Loop insertion “a short term trial.” J Obstet Gynaecol. (India) XXIV: 165, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berger, G. S.; Edelman, D. A.; and Regenie, S. J. Patients’ responses to IUD insertion. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 14:146, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burkman, R. T.; Tonascia, J. A.; Atienza, M. F.; and King, T. M. The relationship of immediate post-abortal intrauterine device insertion to subsequent endometritis: a case-control study. Contraception 15:435, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Conrad, C. C.; Ghazi, M.; and Kitay, D. Z. Acute neurovascular sequelae of intrauterine device insertion or removal, J Reprod. Med. 11:211, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Engineer, A. D., and San wal, K. A comparative study of postpartum, puerperal, and non-puerperal insertions of Lippes Loops, J Obstet Gynaecol. (India) XXII:262, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Esposito, J. M.; Zarou, D. M.; and Zarou, G. S. A Dalkon Shield imbedded in a myoma: case report of an unusual displacement of an intrauterine contraceptive device. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 117:578, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldsmith, A.; Goldberg, R.; Eyzaguirre, H.; Lucero, S.; and Lizana, L. IUD insertion in the immediate postabortal period. In Family planning research conference, a multi-disciplinary approach, eds. A. Goldsmith, and R. Snowden, Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hallatt, J. G. Repeat ectopic pregnancy: a study of 123 consecutive cases. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 122:520, 1975.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hasson, H. M.; Berger, G. S.; and Edelman, D. A. Factors affecting intrauterine contraceptive device performance 1. Endometrial cavity length. Am. J. Obstet Gynecol. 126:973, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Holtzhausen, G. H. R. Preliminary report on the use of intra-uterine contraception in private practice. S. A. J. Obstet Gynecol. 6:18, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Horowitz, A. J. A study of contraceptive effectiveness and incidence of side effects with the use of the Dalkon Shield. Contraception 7:1, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Howard, G. Use of intrauterine devices in nulliparous women. Lancet 2:1339, 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hue, K.; Kwon, H. Y.; Michael, P. H.; and Watson, W. B. A comparative study of the safety and efficacy of postabortal intrauterine contraceptive device insertion. Am. J Obstet Gynecol. 118:975, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. International Fertility Research Program. Unpublished data. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Laes, E.; Lehtovirta, P.; Weintraub, D.; Pyorala, T.; and Luukkainen, T. Early puerperal insertions of Copper-T-200. Contraception 11:289, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Landesman, R.; Kaye, R. E.; and Wilson, K. H. A two-man experience with the Copper “T” intrauterine device. Contraception 7:477, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Larsson, B., and Hamberger, L. Insertion of Copper-7 IUDs in connection with induced abortions during the first trimester. Contraception 12:69, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lippes, J.; Malik, T.; and Tatum, H. J. The post-coital Copper-T. Adv. Plann. Parent. XI:24, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  24. London, G. D., and Anderson, G. V. Immediate postpartum insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device. Obstet. Gyneco J. 30:851, 1967.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marshall, B. R.; Hepler, J. K.; Scott, R. H.; and Zirbel, C. C. The Dalkon Shield in nulliparous women. Am. J Obstet Gynecol. 118:186, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Newton, J.; Harper, M.; and Chan, K. K. Immediate post-placental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Lancet 2:272, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nygren, K-G., and Johansson, E. D. B. Insertion of the endouterine Copper-T (TCu-200) immediately after first trimester legal abortion. Contraception 7:299, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Phatak, L. V., and Bhatia, M. Observations on expulsion of the IUCD in puerperal and nonpuerperal insertions. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 101:773, 1968.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Richardson, J.; Morrison, J.; Chang, A.; and Morrison, J. Epileptiform convulsions during insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device. Lancet 2:148, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ringrose, C. Intrauterine contraceptive devices, J Reprod. Med. 6:96, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ros, A. Our experience with the use of five different medicated intrauterine devices. Contraception 4:271, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schoen, J. A., and Nowak, R. J. Repeat ectopic pregnancy: a 116-year clinical survey. Obstet. Gynecol. 45:542, 1975.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shaila, N. G.; Lane, M. E.; and Sobrero, A. J. A comparative randomized double-blind study of the Copper-T-200 and Copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive devices with modified insertion techniques. Am. J. Obstet Gynecol. 120:110, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sherrod, D. B., and Nicholl, W. Electrocardiographic changes during intrauterine contraceptive device insertion. Am. J Obstet Gynecol. 119:1044, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Solheim, F., and Rydnert, J. Vacuum aspiration at therapeutic abortion—effect of Cu-IUD insertion at operation on post-operative blood loss. Contraception 13: 707, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tejuja, S., and Malkani, P. K. Clinical significance of correlation between size of uterine cavity and IUCD. A study by planimeter-hysterogram technique. Am. J Obstet Gynecol. 105:620, 1969.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Vago, T., and Spira, H. Pregnancy in a bicornuate uterus after insertion of a Lippes Loop (on the horns of a dilemma). Am. J Obstet Gynecol. 97:872, 1967.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wheeler, R.; Buschbom, R. L.; and Marshall, R. K. Rational basis for IUD design and development. In Intrauterine devices: development, evaluation, and program implementation, eds. R. G. Wheeler, G. W. Duncan, and J. J. Speidel. New York: Academic Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wiknjosastro, H.; Doodoh, A.; Rachman, I. A.; Agussjaries, Harap H.; Mitra, M.; and Thomas, M. Postpartum use of the Lippes Loop and Dalkon Shield. In Proceedings of the Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1st Inter-Congress, Vol. 2, ed. S. M. M. Karim. Singapore, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Willson, J. R.; Ledger, W. J.; and Lovell, J. Intrauterine contraceptive devices: a comparison between their use in indigent and private patients. Obstet. Gynecol. 29:59, 1967.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zador, G.; Nillson, B. A.; Nillson, B.; Sjoberg, N. O.; Westrom, L.; and Wiese, J. Clinical experience with the uterine progesterone system (Progestasert). Contraception 13:559, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Edelman, Berger, and Keith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Edelman, D.A., Berger, G.S., Keith, L. (1979). IUD insertion. In: Intrauterine Devices and Their Complications. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0724-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0724-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0219-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0724-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics