Abstract
In its directive principles the Indian constitution contains the provision that the state shall endeavour to promote international peace and security, maintain just and honourable relations between nations, foster respect for international law and treaty obligations in the dealings of organized people with one another and encourage settlement of international disputes by arbitration. Little has been done to carry out the final obligation. India did not accede to the revised General Act for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, as she was not prepared to accept any rigid rules in regard to this matter. Similarly, no arbitration agreements were entered into because issues involving fundamental political interests were better left to settlement through negotiations.1 In general, India welcomed those methods of pacific settlement which did not involve an element of compulsion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Krishna Menon in General Assembly on Nov. 9, 1956. See Wigbold, H. A., “Tien jaar India.” Int. Spectator, XII (1958) 291–336.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1964 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Eekelen, W.F. (1964). India’s Position in International Conflict. In: Indian Foreign Policy and the Border Dispute with China. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0715-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0715-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0213-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0715-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive