Skip to main content

Surveillance and Reconnaissance

  • Chapter
  • 129 Accesses

Abstract

By 1962, and probably even earlier, the USA had detailed information on the number and location of Russian strategic missiles. In 1967 President Johnson stated that satellite reconnaissance was worth ten times the money the USA had spent in space. He suggested that this knowledge had prevented the country from harboring fears that otherwise may have arisen. From the late 1960s to the present the Department of Defense has regularly published information on the level of Russian ICBM, SLBM and ABM deployment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Greenwood, “Reconnaissance and Arms Control”, Scientific American, February, 1973. Reconnaissance satellites are the chief means relied on by the USA and the USSR to verify each other’s compliance with the SALT I accords. What bearing will they and related systems have on SALT II?

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Katz, “Observation Satellites: Problems and Prospects”, Astronautics, April, June, July, August, September, October, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Klass, Secret Sentries in Space, Random House, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Greenwood, “Reconnaisance, Surveillance and Arms Control”, Adelphi Paper No. 88, The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eds., “Backscatter Radar on 2 Coasts to Detect Planes over Horizon”, Electronic Design, July 6, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eds., “New OTH-B radar to be CW bistatic”, Electronic Design, 12 April, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Headrick and M. Skolnik, “Over-the-Horizon Radar in the HF Band”, Proc. IEEE, June, 1974, pp. 664-673. Over-the-horizon (OTH) HF radar using sky-wave propagation via refraction by the ionosphere is capable of detecting targets at distances an order of magnitude greater than conventional microwave radar limited by the line of sight. Some of the characteristics, capabilities, and limitations of OTH radar based on the experience of the MADRE radar as developed by the Naval Research Laboratory are described. Also discussed is the application of OTH radar to air-traffic control and to the remote sensing of sea conditions.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Stehling, “Remote Sensing of the Oceans”, Astronautics and Aeronautics, May, 1969. Ocean-scanning satellites with all known useful sensors no doubt lie ahead, but a hardheaded look to the immediate future finds a polar orbiter with video and microwave radiometer going up first.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Manella, “Aerospace Sensor Systems”, Astronautics and Aeronautics, December, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Parker and M. Wolff, “Remote Sensing”, International Science and Technology, July, 1965. No object can remain completely invisible if we but learn to put highly sensitive detectors to the task of capturing its subtlest emanations.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Special Issue, “Remote Environmental Sensing”, Proc. IEEE, April, 1969. A general reference. Attention is directed to the articles on remote electromagnetic sensing of the earth’s surface.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Horan, “Landsat: Multispectral Eye in the Sky”, IEEE Spectrum, March, 1978. Data collected by the Landsat satellites’ remote sensors are exploited in mapping, meteorology, and resource identification.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Pryor, “The Performance of Imaging Sensors Aloft”, Astronautics and Aeronautics, September, 1971. An expert provides the background needed to understand the debates over film versus TV and other scanners, and airplanes versus satellites for remote sensing.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Mende, “A Low Light Level Slow Scan TV Camera for Satellite Application”, Proceedings IEEE, March, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Advertisement, “High-Sensitivity Infrared (10.6 micron) Heterodyne Receivers with Gigahertz IF Capability”, IEEE Spectrum, June, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Horan, “Spacecraft infrared imaging”, IEEE Spectrum, June, July, 1968. In two parts: principles and applications and systems engineering aspects.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Beauchamp, “Infrared Aerial Photography”, Countermeasures, March, 1976. Near IR terrain illumination equipment for night aerial photo-reconnaissance is becoming more common as technological improvements push the state-of-the-art of electro-optics. The Swedish Defense Material Administration has developed a new pod-mounted IR aerial reconnaissance system which will be used on Sweden’s new all-weather attack aircraft, the SAAB 37 Viggen.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Tomiyasu, “Remote Sensing of the Earth by Microwaves”, Proc. IEEE, January, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  19. News Brief, Electronic Design, 24 May, 1974. The Soviet Union, according to the Pentagon, has put radar carrying satellites into orbit to monitor surface-ship traffic on the high seas. The radar’s high-energy requirements are believed to be supplied by radio isotope sources.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Kazel, “Airborne mapping of terrain using narrow pulsewidths; high resolution even with wide beam antennas”, Proc. IEEE, April, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  21. “Active Microwave Systems for Space Applications”, Session 4, WESCON, Los Angeles, September 14-17, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  22. “No Place to Hide”, Countermeasures, December/January, 1976. A new wide-angle integrated multifrequency synthetic aperture radar, mounted on airborne platforms, can see through dense foliage to seek out tactical targets.

    Google Scholar 

  23. “Problems Corrected on Ocean Surveillance Satellite”, Microwave Systems News, February, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  24. “U.S. seeks to advance reconnaissance lead”, Electronic Warfare, April, 1978. Reports on aircraft reconnaissance.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Katz, “Let Aircraft Make Earth-Resource Surveys”, Astronautics and Aeronautics, June, August, October, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ed., “ERS Resolution: Old Numbers Out”, Astronautics and Aeronautics, April, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Katz, “ERS Resolution: Old Numbers In Again?”, Astronautics and Aeronautics, August, September, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  28. “U.S. Satellite to Keep Eye on Red Missiles”, UPI, 1971. News item on launching of a satellite equipped for early warning of a missile or orbital bomb attack.

    Google Scholar 

  29. “Satellite Navigation”, Countermeasures, December/January, 1976. In the mid-1980s, a new satellite navigational concept known as NAVSTAR global positioning system will circle the earth, providing highly accurate three-dimensional location and speed determinations for use anywhere on earth at any time, and in any kind of weather.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Special Issue, “Satellite Communications”, Proc. IEEE, February, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Special Issue, “Satellite Communications”, Proc. IEEE, March, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Communications Satellite Systems”, Session 32, WESCON, San Fransisco, September 16-19, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  33. H. van Trees et al., “Communications Satellites: looking into the 1980s”, IEEE Spectrum, December, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  34. “Satellite Technology Evolves”, Microwave Systems News, December, 1977. Design of antennas and such subsystems as multiplexers is pushing forward to meet increasing demands of satellite communications.

    Google Scholar 

  35. “Navy Develops Satcom Terminal”, Electronic Warfare, February, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  36. G. Nagy, “Digital image processing activities in remote sensing for earth resources”, Proc. IEEE, October, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  37. “Satellite Computer Developments”, Countermeasures, December/January, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  38. E. Teicholz, “Processing Satellite Data”, Datamation, June, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. Fusca, “Catching a Satellite”, Space/Aeronautics, September, 1965. Describes the problem of rendezvous and inspection of a satellite by another satellite.

    Google Scholar 

  40. R. Hartman, “War in Space”, EW/DE, October, 1978. Increasing U.S. and Soviet military dependence on satellite based systems ensures that battlefields of the future will extend to outer space.

    Google Scholar 

  41. R. Kallas, “Synthetic Apertures Studied for Satellite Radar”, MSN, September, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ed., “Strategic Warfare”, Space/Aeronautics, January, 1969. See Reference 1.16.

    Google Scholar 

  43. “SCDRS: New Life for Military Satcom?”, Microwave Systems News, September, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  44. “Want a Satellite Picture of New England?”, AP News item, 28 January, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  45. D. Capuano, “Satellite-ology Soviet Style”, Telecommunications, October, 1979. From the launch of the first Sputnik until the present, Soviet space scientists have displayed ingenuity in developing practical applications of satellite technology. Gives launch sites, tracking and ground support, communications satellites, remote sensing, geodesy and mapping, navigation, military command and control and reconnaisance applications.

    Google Scholar 

  46. “Prospects for Radar Satellites Hinge on Emerging Technologies”, Microwave Systems News, April 1979. Space based radar program promises ability to track targets ranging from ships to cruise missiles and MIRVs. Advances in antenna structures and monolithic GaAs are crucial.

    Google Scholar 

  47. L. Aspin, “The Verification of the SALT II Agreement”, Scientific American, February, 1979. The U.S. has at its disposal ample “national technical means” of surveillance to detect any attempt by the U.S.S.R. to gain a significant military advantage by violating a new arms pact.

    Google Scholar 

  48. H. Scoville, “Iranian Listening Posts Aren’t Needed to Verify SALT” Los Angeles Times, 11 March, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  49. J. Mason, “SALT II: a state-of-the-art treaty” IEEE Spectrum, May, 1979. Compliance must be verifiable by technical means, so technology determines the treaty’s leeway and its restrictions.

    Google Scholar 

  50. K. Bacon, “Can SALT II be Policed”, Wall Street Journal, 9 July, 1979. The outcome of the verification debate could well depend on trust—the amount of trust Senators place in the nation’s intelligence agencies and in the administration’s willingness to challenge the Soviets over any suspected violations.

    Google Scholar 

  51. F. Moncrief, “SALT Verification”, Microwaves, September, 1979. How we monitor the Soviet arsenal with elint radar and spacecraft.

    Google Scholar 

  52. “The New Military Race in Space”, Business Week, 4 June, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  53. “Defense Satellite Communications in the 1980s”, Countermeasures, December/January 1976. See Reference 1.29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Constant, J.N. (1981). Surveillance and Reconnaissance. In: Fundamentals of Strategic Weapons. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0649-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0649-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0157-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0649-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics