Skip to main content
  • 23 Accesses

Abstract

The central aim of this book is to examine more closely some aspects of the international political process. At the outset the meaning of “international political process” should be clarified. While there is no general agreement either on the definition of “politics” or on the scope of political studies,1 politics is viewed here as a process consisting of the actions and interactions of men and groups of men in so far as they are concerned with the making of authoritative policy for the groups in which they participate. Political activities are those activities of men and groups of men directed toward influencing the making of authoritative policy. Groups, as defined here, are aggregates or collectivities of men, with or without frequent interaction. Policy is the web of decisions and actions that allocate values, both material and non-material, for a group, or in other words, that deny goods to some people and provide them to others. Authoritative policy is policy which is considered binding by the group, either for reasons of moral obligation, of self-interest, or of fear. Students of politics have been interested in the political process in all groups but have mainly concentrated their attention on the political process within national states or among national states. The reason for this concentration of attention is to be found in the underlying value-concern of students of politics, who have sought out the most important problems facing men in their common life and studied the attempts to solve these problems by men organised collectively in national states under governments possessing a monopoly of physical coercion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See David Easton, The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1953)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avery Leiserson, Parties and Politics: An Institutional and Behavioral Approach (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1958), for a good discussion of the subject matter of political studies.

    Google Scholar 

  3. As respective examples of these three ways, see Henry W. Ehrmann, Organized Business in France (Princeton University Press, 1957), chapter 8;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lyman Cromwell White, International Non-Governmental Organizations: Their Purposes, Methods, and Accomplishments (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1951 );

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ernst B. Haas, The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economical Forces 1950–1957 ( London: Stevens & Sons, 1958 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. The literature on interest groups, particularly on American interest groups, is quite considerable. Among the more notable recent general works are: Donald C. Blaisdell, American Democracy Under Pressure ( New York: Ronald, 1957 );

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henry W. Ehrmann (ed.), Interest Groups on Four Continents ( Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1958 );

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. E. Finer, Anonymous Empire: A Study of the Lobby in Great Britain ( London: Pall Mall Press, 1958 );

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jean Meynaud, Les Groupes de Pression en France ( Paris: Armand Colin, 1958 );

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. D. Stewart, British Pressure Groups: Their Role in Relation to the House of Commons (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958 );

    Google Scholar 

  11. David B. Truman, The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion ( New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1951 );

    Google Scholar 

  12. “Unofficial Government: Pressure Groups and Lobbies,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. CCCXIX (September, 1958 );

    Google Scholar 

  13. “Pressure Groups in Britain,” Political Quarterly,Vol. XXIX, No. 1 (January—March, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arthur F. Bentley, The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1908 ). Two of Bentley’s more recent followers are Charles B. Hagan, “The Group in a Political Science,” Approaches to the Study of Politics, ed. Roland Young ( Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1958 );

    Google Scholar 

  15. Earl Latham, “The Group Basis of Politics: Notes for a Theory,” American Political Science Review, Vol. XLVI (June, 1952) pp. 376–97. For recent critical comments on the extreme group approach, see Ehrmann (ed.), op. cit; Stanley Rothman, “Systematic Political Theory: Observations on the Group Approach,” American Political Science Review, Vol. LIV (March, 1960 ), pp. 15–33;

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. E. Dowling, “Pressure Group Theory: Its Methodological Range,” American Political Science Review. (December, 1960 ), pp. 944–54;

    Google Scholar 

  17. Myron Q. Hale, “The Cosmology of Arthur F. Bentley,” American Political Science Review,pp. 955–61;

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robert T. Golembiewski, “’The Group Basis of Politics”’, American Political Science Review,pp. 962–71.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harry Eckstein, Pressure Group Politics: The Case of the British Medical Association ( London: Allen & Unwin, 1960 ), p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gabriel A. Almond, “Introduction: A Functional Approach to Comparative Politics,” The Politics of the Developing Areas, ed. Gabriel A. Almond and James S. Coleman ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960 ), pp. 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  21. This classification follows fairly closely that suggested by J. J. de Jong, “Het Opereren der Verbanden in het Politiek Proces,” Pressiegroepen: De Invloed der Georganiseerde Groepen op het Maatschappelijk en Politiek Leven, J. J. de Jong et. al. ( Utrecht: Het Spectrum, 1959 ).

    Google Scholar 

  22. See, for example, Harold D. Lasswell and Abraham Kaplan, Power and Society: A Framework of Political Inquiry (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 29–52);

    Google Scholar 

  23. Herbert A. Simon, “Notes on the Observation and Measurement of Political Power,” Journal of Politics, Vol. XV (November, 1953 );

    Google Scholar 

  24. James G. March, “An Introduction to the Theory and Measurement of Influence,” American Political Science Review, Vol. XLIX (June, 1955 );

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robert A. Dahl, “The Concept of Power,” Behavioral Science, Vol. II (July, 1957 );

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robert A. Dahl, “A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model”,American Political Science Review, Vol. LII (June, 1958 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1961 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, A.D. (1961). Theoretical Considerations. In: Dutch Organised Agriculture in International Politics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0613-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0613-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0133-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0613-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics