Abstract
The conceptualization of human behavior - with its far-reaching implications for the socialist movement - that de Man developed as alternative to Marxism was formulated in a series of works that followed the retentissement of the Psychology. Although the theoretical framework of the new position had been implicit in the critique, it was not until later that the author attempted a positive formulation of his approach, a fact that lent credence to accusations that his “surmounting” of Marxism led to a vague, unrealistic, and essentially pre-Marxist position. In his sustained and earnest efforts to counter such damaging charges, he was obliged to explore the pragmatic implications of a social methodology alternative to positivism. One accusation was that his renunciation of the Marxist schema necessarily led back to an idealistic minimization of the significance of the situation of action, and that hence such a socialism was “utopian,” not in the old sense that it lacked a social basis but rather in the sense that it had an unrealistically optimistic picture of the political problems faced by the socialist movement. Thus Kahler, his most formidable intellectual opponent, declared with reference to his insistence on the discretionary nature of human action,
The “possible” is in de Man’s outlook to be reached peacefully through reliance on the continued strengthening and consolidation of organized socialism (that is, the movement) - about which there is nothing more to say than that it is a zealous striving for greater justice, a vaguely drawn projection of his own wishes.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ibid., 262-263. De Man’s own sensitivity to such phenomena was not restricted to his vaunted insight into the outlook of the modern proletariat. An extreme illustration is the justification of his abandonment of the formal processes of democracy on the basis of his presumed deeper understanding of how the Belgian worker really felt (Cahiers, 219-224); a reviewer of his post-World War II Jacques Coeur singled out for special praise his insight into mass psychological phenomena of an earlier age: Friedrich Baethgen, Deutsche Literaturzeitung, Jahrgang 72, Heft 4 (April 1951), 178–183. It might be noted that a center of recent theoretical attention especially in American anthropology has been precisely in delineating such concepts as Kroeber’s “configurations,” Kluckhohn’s “covert” or “implicit” culture, Herskovits’ “foci,” and Opler’s “themes” that, emphasizing the structural and normative but largely inexplicit components of culture, serve to sum up underlying, regnant patterns of behavior.
On the part of Martin Buber, for one. See also A. A. J. Pfaff, Hendrik de Man: Zijn Wijsgerige Fundering van Moderne Socialisme [H. de Man: His Philosophical Rationale of Modern Socialism] (Antwerp-Amsterdam, 1956); and E. van der Straeten, “Het Socialisme in zijn sociaal-psychologische en cultuur-historische Verklaring bij Hendrik de Man” [H. de Man’s Social-Psychological and Culture-Historical Interpretation of Socialism], Tijdschrift voor Sociale Wetenschappen (Rijksuniversiteit, Ghent), 4. Jaargang, n. 2 (1959), 109–154 (with French résumé).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1966 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dodge, P. (1966). Ideologue — The Positive Formulation. In: Beyond Marxism: The Faith and Works of Hendrik de Man. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0476-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0476-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0015-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0476-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive