Abstract
That scientists make decisions no one doubts. They allocate research funds, in effect deciding which problems are most worth attacking, they decide how large a sample to observe, which experimental methods to use, and even which outlying observations to reject or discount. These are all garden-variety decisions of a well understood sort, even though some of the utilities that enter might be deemed ‘epistemic’. It is thought, however, that other decisions lurk back of all these which are far more germane to the scientific enterprise. I mean, of course, decisions to accept or reject hypotheses. These decisions are held by Levi (1967) to be purely cognitive in the sense that all the pertinent utilities are epistemic. Levi’s program is to develop an appropriate cognitive decision theory which will enable scientists to compute and compare the expected epistemic utilities associated with the acceptance of different hypotheses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Bondi et al., 1960, Rival Theories of Cosmology, Oxford.
Feller, W., 1957, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. I, Wiley, New York.
Fisher, R. A., 1935, Design of Experiments, Oliver and Boyd, London.
Goosens, W. K., 1976, ‘A Critique of Epistemic Utilities’, this volume, p. 93.
Hilpinen, R., 1968, ‘Rules of Acceptance and Inductive Logic’, Acta Philosophica Fennica 21, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Hintikka, K. J. J., 1967, ‘Induction by Enumeration and Induction by Elimination’, in I. Lakatos (ed.), The Problem of Inductive Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Jeffrey, R., 1956, ‘Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses’, Philosophy of Science 23, 237–246.
Jeffrey, R., 1965, The Logic of Decision, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Kuhn, T. S., 1957, The Copernican Revolution, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Levi, I., 1960, ‘Must the Scientist Make Value Judgments?’, Journal of Philosophy 57, 345–357.
Levi, I., 1967, Gambling with Truth, A. Knopf, New York (new paperback edition, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1973).
Neyman, J., 1950, First Course in Probability and Statistics, Henry Holt, New York.
Popper, K., 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.
Rosenkrantz, R., 1975, ‘Simplicity’, in C. K. Hooker and W. Harper (eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Foundations of Probability and Statistics and Statistical Theories of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston.
Swain, M. (ed.), 1970, Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosenkrantz, R. (1976). Cognitive Decision Theory. In: Bogdan, R.J. (eds) Local Induction. Synthese Library, vol 93. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9799-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9799-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-9801-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9799-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive