Skip to main content

The Italian Humanists and the Christian Doctrine of Salvation

  • Chapter
The Two Reformations in the 16th Century
  • 53 Accesses

Abstract

The origin of the modified religious views of the Humanists must be sought in Italy, which, in the second half of the 15th century, set the fashion for all cultural life. The new attitude to life of the self-assured and proud citizens of the Italian cities, who more than anyone in the Middle Ages showed a spiritual affinity with the citizen of the Greek polis and the civis romanus, was decisive for the formation of these ideas. Like their spiritual ancestors, they too did not flee from the difficulties and uncertainties of fate into an other world with a miraculously given supernatural salvation as their sole deliverance. These Italians dared to look fortuna in the face, and had accepted the world while trying critically to understand it. They were conscious of having to bear the responsibility of their actions themselves. In the words of Salutati: “it is the act of free will which makes man free ; we deserve no praise for the good which makes us good, but for the good brought about by us, if God gives us the worthiness to work and to perform meritorious deeds.” 1 “The veil of belief, child-like constraint and fancy in which the world was enveloped for those living in the Middle Ages,” says Burckhardt “was first raised in the Renaissance. Man became a spiritual individual, a subject recognizing himself.”2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Quotation from De fato, fortuna et casu: Eugenio Garin, Der italienische Humanismus, translated from the Italian (1947): 26.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burckhardt, Die Kultur; 99.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dilthey, op. cit.: 20 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dilthey, op. cit.: 18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. op. cit.: 416 (Die Funktion der Anthropologie in der Kultur des 16. und 17.Jahrhunderts).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garin, op. cit.: 22, 50, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. „Der Drang ins Unendliche, das Nichtverharren können bei irgendeinem Gegebenen und Errreichten, ist keine Schuld, keine Hybris des Geistes, sondern es ist das Siegel seiner göttlichen Bestimmung und seine Unzerstörbarkeit“; Ernst Cassirer, Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance: Bibliothek Warburg X (1927): 73.

    Google Scholar 

  8. illam novam ac rudern mundi creationem […] Nostra namque, hoc est humana, sunt, quoniam ab hominibus effecta, quae cernuntur: omnes domus, omnia oppida, omnes urbes, omnia denique orbis terrarum aedificia, quae nimirum tanta et talia sunt, ut potius angelorum quam hominum opera, ob magnam quandam eorum excellentiam, iure censeri debeant. Nostrae sunt picturae, nostrae sculpturae, nostrae sunt artes, nostrae scientiae, nostrae … sapientiae. Nostrae sunt denique… omnes adinventiones, nostra omnia diversarum linguarum ac variarum litterarnm genera, de quarum necessariis usibus quanto magis magisque cogitamus, tanto vehementius admirari et obstupescere cogimur. (Quotation in: Giovanni Gentile, Giordano Bruno e il pensiero del Rinascimento ( s.d.): 175 f.).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Necca A. Robb, Neoplatonism of the Italian Renaissance (1935): 40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dilthey, op. cit.: 27.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erkenntnis von der Bedeutung der körperlichen Vorgänge im Haushalte des Lebens.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eugenio Garin, “Problemi di religione e filosofia nella cultura florentina del Quattrocento”, Bibliothèque de I’Humanisme et Renaissance, Mélanges Aug. Renandet XIV (1952): 70.

    Google Scholar 

  13. And they were not only plebeians, but both merchants and patricians of the city as well as plebeians […] for the love of God.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Garin, “Problemi di religione”: 71

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robb, op. cit.: 42.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garin, op. cit.: 72, 76.

    Google Scholar 

  17. two types of virtues: those which purify human acts, which man indicates by the word justice, and those by which we are led to knowledge of truth, that man, by supreme right, calls religion. (Christ. Landini libri quattuor, quoted by: Erwin Panofsky, Studies in Iconology, Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance (1939): 139)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paul Wernle, Renaissance und Reformation (cf. Introduction, note 2): 15.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dario Bonomo, L’Orlando Furioso, nelle sue fonti [1955]: 87, 88.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vittorio Rossi, II Quattrocento, Storia letteraria d’Italia 3 (1933): 337.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robb, op. cit.: 96 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rossi, op. cit.: 350, 391; — H. J. Hak, Marsilio Ficino (Thesis Univ. of Utrecht, 1934): 82.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Chastel, “L’Apocalypse en 1500,” Bibl. de VHumanisme et Renaissance, Mélanges A. Renandet XIV (1955): 124 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eug. Garin, “Lo spirito cristiano di Pico della Mirandola,” in: Pensee humaniste et tradition chrétienne aux XVe et XVIe siècles, Colloques internationaux du centre national de la recherche scientifique, Sciences humaines I (1950): 173.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Giuseppe Toffanin, “La sensibilité chrétienne des grands siècles de l’Humanisme,” Pensée humaniste: 155.

    Google Scholar 

  26. la création d’une éthique de la noblesse humaine: Aug. Renaadet, Dante humaniste (1954): 103.

    Google Scholar 

  27. loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hak, op. cit.: 91-93.

    Google Scholar 

  29. the active intelligence is nothing but God: Ernst Cassirer, “Giovanni Pico della Mirandola,” Journal of the History of Ideas III (1942): 138.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hak, op. cit.: 89.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cassirer, “Giov. Pico della Mirandola”: 136.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dilthey, Anschauung: 46.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. Bultmann, “Humanismus und Christentum,” Hist. Zeitschrift 176 (1953): 8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Quoniam si deus ad se rapit mundum, mundusque rapitur, unus quidem continuus attractus est, a Deo incipiens, transiens in mundum, in Deum denique desinens, qui quasi circulo quodam in idem, unde manabit, iterum remeat. Circulus itaque unus et idem a Deo in mundum, a mundo in Deum, tribus nominibus nuncupatur: prout in Deo incipet et allicit: pulchritudo: prout in mundum transiens ipsum rapit: amor; prout in autorem remeans ipsi suum opus coniungit: voluptas. (quotation from Ficino in: Panofsky, Iconology: 141).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Robb, op. cit.: 75 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  36. II Quattrocento: 331.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Translation of Eliz. Livermore Forbes in: The Renaissance Philosophy, edited by E. Cassirer, Paul O. Kristeller and John Randall jr. (1945): 224, 225.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cf. the quotation on p. 22 above, n. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hak, op. cit.: 92.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Robb (op. cit.: 108) demonstrates how even Lorenzo the Magnificent, in some of his Laudi shows a seriousness quite opposite all frivolity he displays elsewhere.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hans Baron, “Franciscan Poverty and Civic Wealth as factors in the Rise of Humanistic Thought,” Speculum XIII (1938): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cassirer, “Giov. Pico délia Mirandola”: 320.

    Google Scholar 

  43. “li semplici naturali sono finite e l’opère che l’occhio commanda alle mani sono infinite: come dimostra il pittore nelle finziani d’infinité forme d’animale et erbe, piante e siti,” (quotation from Trattato delta pittura, in: Cassirer, Individuum und Kosmos: 73).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cassirer, Individuum: 102.

    Google Scholar 

  45. the shaper and moulder of himself, according to his own judgments and honor.

    Google Scholar 

  46. The Renaissance Philosophy: 225.

    Google Scholar 

  47. the spark of the superior intelligence [with its] own power; Walter Dress, Die Mystik des Marsilio Ficino (1929): 58.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cf. chapt. III. hereinafter.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cassirer, Individuum: 45.

    Google Scholar 

  50. climbs up to sublimity … descends to dejection, Hak, op. cit.: 93.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Cassirer, Individuum: 82, 102.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Quotation from a letter of Ficino to Cavalcanti in: Charles Trinkaus, “The Problems of Free Will in the Renaissance and the Reformation,” Journal of the History of Ideas X (1949): 55.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Loc. cit.: 57.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Quotation from Ficino, Epistolae, in: Robb, op. cit.: 70.

    Google Scholar 

  55. op. cit.: 69.

    Google Scholar 

  56. The Renaissance Philosophy: 154 (Introduction to Valla’s letter to Garsia on free will).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Henri Busson, Le rationalisme dans la littérature française de la Renaissance, 1533–1601 (nouv. édition 1957): 55–61 (Busson gives a good summary of Pomponazzi’s ideas: 46-64); — Lucien Febvre, Le problème de I’incroyance au XVIe siècle, la religion du Rabelais (1947): 266.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bultmann, “Humanismus,” 14.

    Google Scholar 

  59. See p. 15; — Garin, Der italienische Humanismus: 54-58; — Paul O. Kristeller, Studies in Renaissance Thought and Letters (1956): 265.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hak, op. cit.: 98, 99.

    Google Scholar 

  61. friendship among equals (Dress, op. cit.: 199).

    Google Scholar 

  62. be thyself and I will be thine (Cassirer, Individuum: 68).

    Google Scholar 

  63. In his Heptaplus Pico gave an allegorical interpretation of the story of the creation; Landino reads Virgil’s Aeneid as an allegory of the story of Christ; cf. Cassirer, “Giov. Pico della Mirandola”: 137.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Dress, op. cit.: 132; Hak, op. cit.: 104.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Individuum: 329, 330.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Robb, op. cit.: 118. Under the impression of Savonarola’s penitential sermons Benivieni republished his love poems with a commentary in which he interpreted them as an allegory of christian thought.

    Google Scholar 

  67. On Platonic Theology, or on the immortality of the souls and eternal happiness, Florence, 1474.

    Google Scholar 

  68. G. van der Leeuw, Phänomenologie der Religion (1933): 295.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Loc. cit.: 296.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ernest Renan, Averroés et VAverroisme, essai historique 2 (1861), passim

    Google Scholar 

  71. Cassirer, Individuum: 144 ff.; — Petrus Pompanatius, De i mmortalitate animae, éd. G. Gentile in Testi jilosofici inediti e rati (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Garin, Ital. Humanismus: 172; — Franz Dittrich, Gaspar o Contarini, 1483–1542 (1885): 222, 230.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Garin, op. cit.: 171; — Cassirer, Individuum: 85.

    Google Scholar 

  74. philosophy seeks truth, theology finds it, religion possesses it: Rossi, Quattrocento: 330.

    Google Scholar 

  75. The Renaissance Philosophy (Introduction): 10.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Loc. cit.: 18.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Burckhardt, Kultur der Renaissance: 366; nevertheless he was a superstitious man; on his death-bed he exhorted his friends to serious piety and in particular to belief in immortality and retribution after death.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Cassirer, “Giovanni Pico”: 330.

    Google Scholar 

  79. The Renaissance Philosophy: 274.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Cassirer, Individuum: 84.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Dress, Die Mystik: 124.

    Google Scholar 

  82. all … natural religion is the firmest fundamental of immortality for man; Ivan Pusino, “Ficinos und Picos religiös-philosophische Anschauungen,” Zeitschr. f. Kirchengeschichte XLIV (1925): 521.

    Google Scholar 

  83. damit wir Menschen in Gott verwandelt würden, weil nun die Schranken der Materie durchbrochen sind und der Mensch sich in sein eigentliches Wesen zurückfinden kann (op. cit.: 196; Hak, Marsüius Ficinus: 99).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Dress, op. cit.: 197-199; Hak, op. cit.: 108.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Dress, op. cit.: 214.

    Google Scholar 

  86. non cogit ad salutem Deus homines, quos ab initio liberos procreavit, sed assiduis inspirationibus singulos allicit, quod si qui ad eum accesserint, hos durat laboribus, exercet adversitatibus et, velut igné aurum, sic animum probat difficultate. (quotation from De Christiana religione in Cassirer, Individuum: 70, see also p. 86, 87.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Hak, op. cit.: III; Eug. Garin, (“Problemi di religione e filosofia nella cultura fiorentino del Quattrocento: Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance, Mélanges Aug, Renaudet, XIV (1952): 70-82) says that the philosophy of the Florentines agrees with un cristianesimo ridotto a pura norma di vita, and that Ficino, according to Pulci, has teached: chi tenga la propria legge (that is that law, which is common to all religions) osservando la voluntà di Dio sarà salvato.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Pusino, “Ficinos und Picos Anschauungen”: 532.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Cassirer, Individuum: 138; — Pusino, loc. cit.: 534; — Toffanin,, Storia dell umanesimo II (1950): 116.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Pusino, “Ficinos und Picos Anschauungen”: 519.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Formerly in the church of the Eremitani in Padua, now destroyed.

    Google Scholar 

  92. nel godimento del Summo Bene, al quali si arriva per atto di voluntà piuttosto che del l’intelletto, per via dell’amore (Rossi, Quattrocento: 346).

    Google Scholar 

  93. See the examples given by J. Burckhardt, Die Kultur der Renaissance: 364.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Rossi, Quattrocento: 346.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Pusino, “Ficinos und Picos Anschauungen”: 526.

    Google Scholar 

  96. but the development of the soul and the knowledge of truth which I have always sought above all (Pusino, op. cit.: 528).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Cassirer, Individuum: 47.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Bultmann, “Humanismus und Christentun”: 11.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Cassirer, Individuum: 81; Alfred Doren, Fortuna im Mittelalter und in der Renaissance: Bibliothek Warburg II (1922-3, II Abt.): 135.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Augustin Renaudet, Préreéfortne et Humanisme à Paris, pendant les premières guerres d’Italie, (1494–1517) (nouv. éd. 1953): 141.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Quid aliud Christus fuit nisi liber quidem moralis, imo divinae philosophiae, vivens, de coelo missus, et divina ipsa idea virtutum humanis oculis manifesta. (Dress, op. cit.: 138).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Cassirer, Individuum: 75.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Hak, op. cit.: 98-100.

    Google Scholar 

  104. nicht als das Nebeneinander dreier “Naturen” in einer an sich einfachen Substanz, sondern als die kontinuierliche Einheit einer Entwicklung (Cassirer, Individuum: 95).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Cassirer, “Giovanni Pico della Mirandola”: 139.

    Google Scholar 

  106. See for what follows: L. Gauthier Pignal, Pico de la Mirandole (1937): 130 ff.; — Eugenio Anagnine, Giov. Pico della Mirandola, sincretismo religioso-filosofico (1937): 33-45.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Anagnine, op. cit.: 69.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Pusino, “Ficinos und Picos Anschauungen”: 537; — Engelbert Monnerjahn, “Zum Begriff der theologischen Unklarheit im Humanismus”: Festgabe Joseph Lortz I (1958): 297.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Hak, op. cit.: 113; — it is noteworthy, that Ficino in his sermons (partly published in Opera) never mentions the principal dogmas of the Church, they all are moral admonitions and warnings, that could be given by a disciple of the ancients as well as by a Christian priest (Kristeller, Studies in Renaissance Thought and Letters: 115 ff)..

    Google Scholar 

  110. Hak, op. cit.: 50.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Hak, op. cit.: 107-112.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Raymond Marcel, “L’apolétique de Marsile Ficin (Pensée humaniste et tradition chrétienne 1): 160.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Hak, op. cit.: 52.

    Google Scholar 

  114. die Gebildeten unter ihren Verächtern.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Quotation from Opera I: 1, in: Marcel, “L’apolétique”: 162.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Panofsky, Iconology: 140; Ficino calls Plato “the Greek speaking Moses.”

    Google Scholar 

  117. intellectus voluntatem illuminet, voluntas intellectum accendat, […] Nostrum vero rete est platonica ratio quae quidem si modo rite trahitur sub Christiana veritate, non scinditur, sed permanet intégra dum impletur. (Mars. Ficino, Liber de Christiana religione, Opera, Parisiis 1641, fo 1; comp. Marcel, “L’apologétique: 165; — Hak, op. cit.: 96).

    Google Scholar 

  118. G. Toffanin, “La sensibilité chrétienne”: 155.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Burckhardt, Die Kultur: 366.

    Google Scholar 

  120. A. Doren, Fortuna im Mittelalter: 121.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Doren, op. cit.: 115.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Doren, op. cit.: 122-128.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Hans Baron, “Willensfreiheit und Astrologie bei Mars. Ficino und Pico della Mirandola,” Kultur-und Universalgeschichte … Walter Goetz dargebracht (1927): 145–169.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Ernst Walser, Lebens-und Glaubensprobleme aus dem Zeitalter der Renaissance: die Religion des Luigi Pulci, ihre Quellen und ihre Bedeutung (1926): 39.

    Google Scholar 

  125. The above-mentioned spiriti and angels must be distinguished in nature from these.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Cassirer, “Giov. Pico della Mirandola”: 344.

    Google Scholar 

  127. For Pomponazzi see: The Renaissance Philosophy: 277; — Cassirer, loc. cit.: 344.

    Google Scholar 

  128. non tarnen sunt eorum dicta ita firmae authoritatis et immobilitatis, ut eis contradicere non liceat et circa ea dubitare. (Cassirer, loc. cit.: 325; — Anagnine, Pico delta Mirandola: 45 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Garin, Italienische Humanismus: 127.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Burckhardt, Die Kultur der Renaissance: 401.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Cassirer, Individuum: 75.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Pusino, “Ficinos und Picos Anschauungen:” 508.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Ibidem: 530.

    Google Scholar 

  134. factum est, ut pia philosophia quondam et apud Persas sub Zoroaster et apud Aegyptios sub Mercurio nasceretur, utrobique sibimet consona, nutriretur deinde apud Thraces sub Orpheo atque Aglaophemo, adolesceret quoque mox sub Pythagora apud Graecos et Italos, tandem vero a divo Piatone consummaretur Athenis (Garin, Italien, Humanismus: 109, cf. also: 107).

    Google Scholar 

  135. Burckhardt, Die Kultur der Renaissance: 365.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Richard Copley Christie, Etienne Dolet, le martyr de la Renaissance (1886): 14.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Annotation of Ludwig Geiger in his edition of Burckhardt, Die Kultur der Renaissance II (1919): 176.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Burckhardt, Kultur der Renaissance: Gesamtausgabe V: 402.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Ernst Cassirer, “Die platonische Renaissance in England und die Schule von Cambridge,” Studien der Bibliothek Warburg (1932): 61–68 (the quotation is from Augustine).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1961 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Gelder, H.A.E. (1961). The Italian Humanists and the Christian Doctrine of Salvation. In: The Two Reformations in the 16th Century. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9562-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9562-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8719-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9562-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics