Skip to main content

The Sector Theory and Polar Sovereignty

  • Chapter
The Ross Dependency

Abstract

According to a theory advanced by Captain Bernier in 1906; as formulated by Senator Poirier in the Canadian Parliament in 1907:1

In future partition of northern lands, a country whose possession today goes up to the Arctic regions, will have a right, or should have a right, or has a right to all the lands that are to be found in the waters between a line extending from its eastern extremity north, and another line extending from the western extremity north. All the lands between the two lines up to the north pole should belong and do belong to the country whose territory abuts up there.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (supra) at p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  2. (supra) at p. 266.

    Google Scholar 

  3. (supra) at p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  4. v. Münch (supra) at p. 239.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Svarlien (1964) (supra) at p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 1931U.K.T.S. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Isachsen, “The New Norwegian Dependency in the Antarctic”, 2(1) Le Nord (1939), 67, 78.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. O. Svarlien, “The Sector Principle in Law and Practice” 10 Polar Record 248, 252.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Q. Wright, “Territorial Propinquity”, 12 A.J.I.L. (1918), 519, 522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lakhtine (supra) at p. 705.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Mouton, “The International Regime of the Polar Regions” 107 Rec. des Cours (1962) 175; 243.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Breitfuss (supra) at p. 469.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Taracouzio (supra) at p. 345.

    Google Scholar 

  14. da Costa (1958) (supra) at p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keesing (supra).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Art. 3 Statute on the Protection of the State Boundary of the U.S.S.R. 1960, cited by W. E. Butler, The Law of Soviet Territorial Waters (1967), III.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taracouzio (supra) at p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lakhtine (supra) at p. 707.

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. N. Petrov, “Soviet Participation in the International Geophysical Year”, 9 Bulletin of the Institute for the Study of the U.S.S.R. (1957), 3, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Taracouzio (supra) at pp. 69-70.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Svarlien (Polar Record) (supra) at p. 250.

    Google Scholar 

  22. da Costa (1951) (supra) at p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Taracouzio (supra) at p. 330.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Breitfuss (supra) at p. 467.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Isachsen (supra).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dollot (1953) (supra).

    Google Scholar 

  27. da Costa (1958) (supra) at p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 1931 U.K.T.S. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 28 S. Calif. L.R. (1955), 386, 397.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lakhtine (supra) at p. 717.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Smedal (supra) at p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  32. da Costa (1958) (supra) at p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  33. “British Antarctic Territory” 8 Commonwealth Survey (13 March 1962) 265.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Quoted from the first Bull “Eximiae Devotionis”, 1493 by H. Harisse, The Diplomatic History of America (1897), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  35. McKitterick (supra) at p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Whiteman, Digest, ii, 1268.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Movchan (supra) at p. 357.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Goebel (supra) at p. 119 citing Gryphiander.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Antarctica cases (supra) at p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hayton (1960) (supra) at p. 398.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Svarlien (Polar Record) (supra) at p. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Smedal, (supra) at pp. 37 and 61.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Taracouzio (supra) at p. 358.

    Google Scholar 

  44. D. Pharand, “Soviet Union warns United States against use of Northeast Passage”, 62 A.J.I.L. (1968), 927.

    Google Scholar 

  45. v. Münch (supra) at p. 239.

    Google Scholar 

  46. P. W. van der Veur, Search for New Guinea’s Boundaries (1966), 4 and 125.

    Google Scholar 

  47. A. S. Helm and J. H. Miller, Antarctica (1964), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  48. J. G. Hayes, Antarctica (1928), 362.

    Google Scholar 

  49. G. Taylor, Antarctic Adventure and Research (1930), 228.

    Google Scholar 

  50. da Costa (1951) (supra) at p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Richardson (supra) at p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1972 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Auburn, F.M. (1972). The Sector Theory and Polar Sovereignty. In: The Ross Dependency. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9540-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9540-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8708-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9540-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics