Skip to main content

Abstract

Analogy, symbolism and analogia fidei are three methods whereby Aquinas, Tillich and Barth respectively seek to provide a tool capable of giving an adequate interpretation of the God-creature relation and a justification for theological language. Analogy, symbolism and analogia fidei are different answers to the same problem. The problem is the meaning of words applied to God and to creatures. If our words mean exactly the same thing when applied to God and to creatures, then God’s transcendence is eliminated: God ceases to be God in order to be a creature or vice versa. On the other hand, if our words bear an altogether different meaning when applied to God, then God’s immanence is obscured: man is no longer in a position to know God.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Ed. A. Flew and A. Maclntyre (London: S.C.M. Press, 1955 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. J. Charlesworth, “Linguistic Analysis and God,” in International Philosophical Quarterly 1961, p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. T. Ramsey, Religious Language: an Empirical Placing of Theological Phrases ( London: S.C.M. Press, 1957 );

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. M. Crombie, “The Possibility o Theological Statements”, in Faith and Logic, ed. by Mitchell (London 1957 );

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. G. Mitchell, Faith and Logic; M. Forster, “Contemporary British Philosophy and Christian Belie,” in Cross Currents 1960, pp. 375–385.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. J. Charlesworth, Linguistic Analysis and God, in “International Philosophical Quarterly” 1961, pp. 163–164.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. J. Scheeben, The Mysteries of Christianity, transi. C. Vollert, (London-St. Louis: Herder, 1947 ), pp. 752–753.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1963 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mondin, B. (1963). The Meaning of Theological Language. In: The Principle of Analogy in Protestant and Catholic Theology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9526-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9526-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8701-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9526-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics